Christina Schraml1, Jana Taron1, Nina F Schwenzer1, Holger Schmidt1, Thomas Kuestner2, Michael Erb3, Mike Notohamiprodjo1, Konstantin Nikolaou1, Fritz Schick4, and Petros Martirosian4
1Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany, 2Institute of Signal Processing and System Theory, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, 3Department of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany, 4Section on Experimental Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
Synopsis
SMS-acceleration
allows for considerable scan time reduction in hepatic DWI without substantial
drawbacks in image quality both using respiratory-triggering and free-breathing
acquisitions. In the present study set-up, ADC measured in SMS-DWI were lower
than in standard DWI which should be considered when using absolute ADC for
clinical reading. The demonstrated high image quality of SMS-DWI obtained in FB
indicates great potential for scan time reduction in DWI for abdominal and
whole-body applications.Purpose
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) provides
important diagnostic information in the evaluation of liver disease
1. However, the long
scan time of DWI limits its acceptance in clinical routine. Thus, scan time
reduction techniques and their validation are an essential issue in abdominal
DWI. The so-called SMS (simultaneous multislice) technique
2-4
has recently been demonstrated as a promising method for scan time reduction in
DWI of the liver
5. The influence of
the breathing scheme on image characteristics in SMS-DWI of the liver has not yet
been systematically investigated. Thus, the aim of our study was to evaluate image
characteristics obtained in SMS-accelerated DWI of the liver with both
respiratory-triggering and free-breathing in comparison to standard (STD) sequences
as reference.
Methods
The study
was approved by the institutional review board. 10 healthy volunteers and 12
patients were included. All participants were scanned in a whole-body 1.5 T scanner
(Aera, Siemens Healthcare). MR protocol included STD and SMS-accelerated EPI
DWI sequences with respiratory-triggering and free breathing (STD-RT, STD-FB, SMS-RT,
SMS-FB). Monopolar diffusion preparation according to the Stejskal-Tanner
scheme
6 was used with
b-values of 50, 400, 800 s/mm². Sequence parameters are summarized in
Table 1. Scan time of DWI sequences was
measured. Images obtained by SMS-DWI and STD-DWI with both breathing schemes
were analyzed quantitatively (ADC, SNR) and qualitatively with respect to
overall image quality and detailed image criteria (5-point Likert scale,
5=excellent). Qualitative and quantitative parameters were compared using the
Steel-Dwass test. P-values <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical
significance.
Results
SMS-DWI
provided diagnostic image quality in volunteers and patients with both
breathing schemes with a reduction of scan time of 70 % (0:56 vs. 3:20 min in
FB). Mean image quality did not significantly differ between breathing schemes in
both STD and SMS sequences (STD-RT 4.1±0.7, STD-FB 4.0±0.8, SMS-RT: 4.0±0.7;
SMS-FB: 4.0±0.7) (
Figure 1-3). In
the analysis of particular image quality criteria, discrepancies were observed
between STD and SMS with slightly higher incidence of ghosting artifacts and
interslice signal inhomogeneity in SMS-DWI
. SNR did not significantly differ between DWI sequences. Slightly
lower ADC where found in FB both in STD and SMS-DWI without statistical significance.
In general, ADC were significantly lower in SMS-DWI compared to STD-DWI irrespective
of the breathing scheme (1.2±0.1 x 10
-3 mm²/s vs. 1.0±0.1 x 10
-3 mm²/s;
p<0.0001).
Discussion
SMS-accelerated DWI of the liver provided significant
scan time reduction while maintaining equivalent image quality as compared to
STD technique both using RT and FB acquisition. ADC values were within the
range of values reported in the literature
1,7-10. The
discrepancies in ADC between STD-DWI and SMS-DWI may possibly be explained by T1
saturation effects due to the relatively low repetition time chosen in SMS-DWI
to optimize scan time reduction. As our study results indicate that the image
quality in SMS with FB does not have substantial drawbacks compared to SMS with
RT acquisition in both volunteers and patients, the FB technique will be
preferable in clinical routine due to the markedly shorter scan time. Based on these
results, prospective patient studies testing the diagnostic performance of FB SMS-DWI
in the evaluation of liver pathologies should be encouraged.
Conclusion
SMS-acceleration allows for considerable scan
time reduction in hepatic DWI with equivalent image quality compared to standard
techniques both using respiratory-triggering and free-breathing. Potential discrepancies
in ADC between STD-DWI and SMS-DWI need to be considered when transferring the
SMS technique to clinical routine reading.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1 Taouli, B. & Koh, D. M.
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver. Radiology
254, 47-66,
doi:10.1148/radiol.09090021 (2010).
2 Feinberg, D. A. et al. Multiplexed echo planar imaging
for sub-second whole brain FMRI and fast diffusion imaging. PloS one 5, e15710, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015710 (2010).
3 Moeller, S. et al. Multiband multislice GE-EPI at 7
tesla, with 16-fold acceleration using partial parallel imaging with
application to high spatial and temporal whole-brain fMRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 63, 1144-1153, doi:10.1002/mrm.22361
(2010).
4 Xu, J. et al. Evaluation of slice
accelerations using multiband echo planar imaging at 3 T. NeuroImage 83, 991-1001,
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.055 (2013).
5 Obele, C. C. et
al. Simultaneous Multislice
Accelerated Free-Breathing Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Liver at 3T. Abdominal imaging,
doi:10.1007/s00261-015-0447-3 (2015).
6 Stejskal EO, T. J.
Spin echoes in the presence of a time dependent gradient field. J Chem Phys 42, 288 (1965).
7 Chen, X. et al. Liver diffusion-weighted MR
imaging: reproducibility comparison of ADC measurements obtained with multiple
breath-hold, free-breathing, respiratory-triggered, and navigator-triggered
techniques. Radiology 271, 113-125,
doi:10.1148/radiol.13131572 (2014).
8 Donati, O. F. et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of
upper abdominal organs: field strength and intervendor variability of apparent
diffusion coefficients. Radiology 270, 454-463,
doi:10.1148/radiol.13130819 (2014).
9 Jerome, N. P. et al. Comparison of free-breathing
with navigator-controlled acquisition regimes in abdominal diffusion-weighted
magnetic resonance images: Effect on ADC and IVIM statistics. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI
39, 235-240, doi:10.1002/jmri.24140
(2014).
10 Kwee, T.
C., Takahara, T., Koh, D. M., Nievelstein, R. A. & Luijten, P. R.
Comparison and reproducibility of ADC measurements in breathhold, respiratory
triggered, and free-breathing diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI
28, 1141-1148,
doi:10.1002/jmri.21569 (2008).