Yilin Liu1, Fang-Fang Yin2, Brian Gary Czito2, Mustafa R. Bashir 3, Manisha Palta 2, Xiaodong Zhong 4, Brian M. Dale 5, and Jing Cai2
1Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States, 2Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States, 3Department of Radiology, Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States, 4MR R&D Collaborations, Siemens Healthcare, Atlanta, GA, United States, 5MR R&D Collaborations, Siemens Healthcare, Cary, NC, United States
Synopsis
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has
been shown to have superior tumor-to-tissue contrast for cancer detection in
abdominal region. However, the respiratory motion may induce severe imaging
errors or artifacts for DWI images. This study aims at developing and
evaluating a respiratory correlated 4D-DWI technique using a retrospective
sorting method for imaging respiratory motion on human subjects. Comparing to
free breathing DWI, 4D-DWI can lead to more accurate measurement of ADC. This
has a great potential to improve the visualization and delineation of cancer
tumors for radiotherapy.Purpose
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has been shown to
have superior tumor-to-tissue contrast for cancer detection compared to other
MRI sequences and CT, especially in the abdominal region. However, respiratory
motion may induce severe imaging errors or artifacts in DWI images. This study
aims at developing and evaluating a respiratory correlated 4D-DWI technique
using a retrospective sorting method for imaging respiratory motion of human
subjects. We also evaluated its effect on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC)
measurement using feature analysis.
Methods
Image acquisition was performed by repeatedly
imaging a volume of interest using an interleaved multi-slice single-shot echo-planar-imaging
(EPI) 2D-DWI sequence in the axial plane. Cine MRI using steady state free
precession was also acquired as a reference showing respiratory motion. Each
2D-DWI image with an intermediately high b-value (b=500 s/mm2) was
acquired in x, y and z diffusion directions. Respiratory motion was
simultaneously recorded using a respiratory bellows, which provided a
synchronized respiratory signal.
The respiratory signal was used in the
retrospective phase sorting algorithm to re-sort DWI images acquired in x, y
and z diffusion directions, respectively. Then the sorted DWI images in three
directions were combined to reconstruct 4D-DWI, and ADC was calculated for each
phase. As a comparison, DWI with no motion correction (free breathing DWI) was
also reconstructed using the same datasets, as well as the ADC. The process is
illustrated in Fig.1.
As a preliminary feasibility study, this
technique was implemented on a computer simulated 4D digital human phantom (XCAT)
[reference 1, reference 2] with a heterogeneous liver tumor. The respiratory motion of the
phantom was generated using 10 liver cancer patients’ breathing profiles measured
previously. Image acquisition process was simulated. 4D-DWI, free breathing DWI
and the corresponding ADC maps were reconstructed. Motion trajectories of the
tumor were extracted from 4D-DWI and compared with average breathing curves
calculated from the input profiles. The mean motion trajectory amplitude
differences (D), mean ADC value and entropy of the tumor were calculated.
The technique was then evaluated on two healthy
volunteers and one lung cancer patient (under a HIPAA-compliant IRB-approved
study protocol with informed consent). Motion trajectories of defined regions
of interest (ROI), right kidney of the healthy volunteers and tumor of the
patient, respectively, were extracted from 4D-DWI and compared with those
obtained from the cine MRI acquisition as a reference. D values were calculated.
Mean ADC value and entropy of Volume of Interest (VOI: liver for the healthy
volunteer and tumor of the patient) was calculated for one healthy volunteer
and one patient.
Results
Tumor
trajectories extracted from simulated XCAT 4D-DWI were consistent with the
input signal: average D values for the tumor were 1.9 mm in the
superior-inferior (SI) direction, and 0.4mm in the anterior-posterior (AP)
direction. Fig.2(a) shows
example ADC map set for the XCAT heterogeneous liver tumor.
On average for the 10 patients’ breathing profiles, the mean tumor region ADC
value was 2.7×10-3 mm2/s with 4D-DWI and 4.3×10-3
mm2/s with free breathing DWI, respectively. The ground-truth was
2.3×10-3 mm2/s, as shown in Fig.2(b). The mean tumor
region entropy was 0.29 with 4D-DWI and 0.87 with free breathing DWI,
respectively. The ground-truth was 0.24, as shown in Fig.2(c). The Wilcoxon
Signed Rank test shows that ADC measurements were significantly more accurate
with the 4D-MRI technique.
Reconstructed
4D-DWI of the human subjects also revealed the respiratory motion clearly.
Figure 3 shows example healthy volunteer 4D-DWI images, and the free-breathing
DWI images in comparison. The corresponding ADC maps for this healthy volunteer
are shown in Fig.4. In addition, ADC maps for the patient are shown in Fig.5.
The mean values of D were 2.6 mm (SI) and 1.7 mm (AP) for the two healthy
volunteers; and 1.6 mm (SI) and 1.4 mm (AP) for the patient. Mean ADC values of
VOI calculated from 4D-MRI (the healthy volunteer:1.5×10-3 mm2/s;
the patient:1.7×10-3 mm2/s) were smaller than that
calculated from free breathing DWI (the healthy volunteer:1.7×10-3 mm2/s;
the patient:2.2×10-3 mm2/s). Entropy measurements of VOI
calculated from 4D-MRI (the healthy volunteer:1.08; the patient:1.22) were also
smaller than that calculated from free breathing DWI (the healthy volunteer:1.11;
the patient:1.35). The ADC feature analysis results have tallied in general
with the XCAT simulation results.
Conclusion
A respiratory correlated 4D-DWI technique has been developed and
evaluated using digital phantom and human subjects. Comparing to free breathing
DWI, 4D-DWI can lead to more accurate measurement of ADC. This has a great
potential to improve the visualization and delineation of cancer tumors for
radiotherapy.
Acknowledgements
This work is
partly supported by funding from NIH (1R21CA165384) and a research grant from
the Golfers Against Cancer (GAC) Foundation.References
Reference 1. W. P. Segars, G. Sturgeon, S.
Mendonca, J. Grimes and B. M. W. Tsui, “4D XCAT phantom for multimodality
imaging research,” Med. Phys. 37, 4902-4915 (2010).
Reference 2. J. Cai, Y. Zhang, I. Vergalasova, F. Zhang, WP. Segars,
F. Yin, “Developing a 4D Radiation Therapy Simulation System Based On a Realistic
4D Digital Human Phantom: Simulation of Imaging and Dose Delivery,” J. Cancer.
Ther. 5,749-758 (2014).