Xiaoming Bi1, Jianing Pang2, Wensha Yang2, Matthias Fenchel3, Zixin Deng2, Yuhua Chen4, Richard Tuli2, Debiao Li2, Gerhard Laub1, and Zhaoyang Fan2
1Siemens Healthcare, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 3Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany, 4University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
Synopsis
4D (respiratory phase-resolved 3D) MRI has
been increasingly used for the planning of radiotherapy and minimally invasive
surgery. Recently developed self-gating methods showed great potential in 4D
MRI by providing high imaging efficiency and isotropic spatial resolution. However,
images of individual phases may suffer from decreased SNR and increased
streaking artifact since only a subset of data were used for reconstruction. A
motion correction and average (MoCoAve) framework was developed in this work to
address such limitations. Preliminary results from patients showed that the
proposed method can significantly improve SNR and image quality without
compromising motion information.Purpose
4D (respiratory
phase-resolved 3D) MRI has been increasingly used for the treatment simulation
and adaption for radiotherapy, as well as planning of minimally invasive
surgery. Recently developed 4D self-gating methods [1-3] overcomes
spatiotemporal limitations of conventional 2D real-time and 3D navigator-gated
methods. Using motion information directly derived from self-gating signal, k-space
data are retrospectively grouped into multiple bins representing different breathing
phases. Since each bin only contains a subset of the acquired data, reconstructions
from individual bin could suffer from low SNR and severe streaking artifacts. Reducing
the number of bins alleviates the undersampling effect within each bin, yet
will introduce blurring as the motion may not be adequately resolved. In this
work, we hypothesize that the quality of 4D images can be improved without
compromising motion information by averaging the undersampled bin images after
motion correction (MoCoAve).
Methods
Two prototype
sequences [2-3] were used for acquiring free-breathing 4D MR images using
stack-of-stars and koosh-ball radial trajectories, respectively. As shown in
Fig. 1, acquired imaging data were evenly grouped into 10 respiratory bins using
self-gating signals extracted either from k-space centers (stack-of-stars) or a
self-gating line (koosh-ball) in the superior-inferior direction. A 3D image was
then reconstructed from each bin using the respective subset of data. The MoCoAve
process was subsequently performed on the undersampled 10-phase image series. For
example, if image set 1 is chosen as the reference bin, then the forward and
inverse transform between image sets 2-9 and image 1 are computed using a symmetric
diffeomorphic model [4]. Then, the MoCoAve image of each phase is produced by
first aligning all phases to this phase using the respective combinations of
transforms, and then averaging the warped images to enhance image quality.
Five patients with
confirmed tumor (3 pancreatic, 1 liver, 1 lung) were scanned on 3T clinical
scanners (MAGNETOM Verio or Biograph mMR, Siemens Healthcare, Germany). Seven 4D
MR scans (4 koosh-ball) were acquired with the following parameters: FLASH
readout; FA = 10°; FOV = 400 mm. Stack-of-stars:
104 partitions, 6/8 partial Fourier, 1504 projections, (1.98 mm)^3 voxel size.
Koosh-ball: 73005 projections, 256 reconstructed partitions with (1.56 mm)^3
resolution. MoCoAve processing was performed offline using MATLAB.
SNR and motion trajectory of tumors were
assessed from each respiratory phase using images directly reconstructed from
individual bins, as well as corresponding images after MoCoAve. SNR was defined
as signal intensity in the liver divided by the standard deviation of
background air signal. For each patient, ROIs for signal measurement were matched
between different image sets. For motion assessment, tumor volumes were drawn
on the end expiration phase of the 4D MR images, and then mapped to the other
phases using a B-spline based deformable registration in VelocityAITM
(Varian, Palo Alto, CA). The coordinates of the contours’ center of mass were
then extracted for tumor motion trajectory evaluation. Measurement results of
SNR and tumor motion before and after MoCoAve were compared using paired
t-test.
Results
4D MR images were
successfully acquired from all subjects. Imaging time was 9.0 and 6.5 minutes,
respectively, using stack-of-stars and koosh-ball trajectories. Fig. 2 shows
representative stack-of-stars and koosh-ball images from two patients. Note visually
improved SNR, reduced streaking artifacts and preserved sharpness using the
proposed MoCoAve method. Quantitative analysis showed significantly improved SNR
(mean±SD without and with MoCoAve: stack-of-stars: 7.5±2.1 vs 21.3±5.9, p <
0.01; koosh-ball: 28.9±13.1 vs 43.2±19.1, p<0.01). Fig. 3 shows example 4D
MoCoAve images at two different phases with resolved respiratory motion. Figure
4 illustrates the motion trajectory of a lung cancer nodule measured from 10
bins without and with MoCoAve. The motion trajectory of tumors measured from 70
volumetric image pairs showed excellent agreement between images reconstructed
without and with MoCoAve. Correlation coefficients were: 0.94±0.10, 0.88±0.12,
and 0.74±0.16 in the SI, AP and LR directions.
Discussion
With the proposed MoCoAve
method, the entire k-space data contribute to the reconstruction of each
respiratory phase. Compared with previous methods that only use a subset of data,
it has the benefits of improved SNR and reduced streaking artifacts for each
respiratory phase. Preliminary studies show measured motion trajectory of tumor
is not compromised. Such a method can be used for improving the quality of 4D
MR images, or accelerating 4D MRI by using fewer projections since SNR loss in
individual bins can be alleviated by the MoCoAve process.
Conclusion
A motion corrected averaging method was developed
for improving the quality of 4D MRI while preserving the motion information.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Buerger C et al, IEEE TMI 2013,
p805.
[2] Grimm R et al, Medical Image Analysis 2015, p110.
[3] Deng Z et al, MRM 2015.
[4] Avants BB et al, Med. Image Anal. 2008, p26