Qinwei Zhang1, Bram F. Coolen1, Gustav J. Strijkers2, Laurens van Buuren3, Uulke van der Heide3, Oliver J. Gurney-Champion 1, Sónia I. Gonçalves4, and Aart J. Nederveen1
1Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 3Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 4Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Synopsis
Diffusion imaging is part
of the standard MR imaging protocol for prostate cancer diagnosis. Conventional
echo planar imaging (EPI) diffusion sequence has limitation on image resolution
and additionally suffers from image distortion. The present study introduces a
new stimulated echo based 3D diffusion preparation turbo spin echo sequence (DPsti-TSE)
to achieve high-resolution and distortion free image. The sequence is also
proved to be immune to eddy currents. Purpose
Diffusion
MRI (DWI) is considered part of the standard imaging protocol for evaluating
prostate cancer. It has been used to distinguish benign and malignant tissue as
well as to evaluate cancer aggressiveness [1,2]. However, conventional
diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging (DW-EPI) allows limited spatial resolution and additionally
suffers from image distortions[3]. Several methods were proposed to combine
diffusion-preparation (DP) with turbo-field-echo (DP-TFE) and turbo-spin-echo
acquisitions (DP-TSE) to achieve high-resolution and distortion-free DWI [4,5].
However, one of the challenges is that eddy currents from the strong diffusion
gradients cause additional, unpredictable, non-diffusion-related signal losses. This
seriously hinders the determination of correct diffusion quantities. In this study
we introduce a new stimulated-echo-based 3D DP-TSE sequence (DPsti-TSE) that is
insensitive to eddy currents. We demonstrate in phantom experiment that the new
sequence yields correct diffusion values and have applied the sequence for
high-resolution distortion-free DWI of the prostate.
Methods
Figure-1 depicts the proposed DPsti-TSE sequence. Every
TSE shot is preceded by a DP module, which consists of a 90°
x-180°
y-180°
y-90°
-x RF pulse train, with diffusion weighting achieved
by 4 gradients (blue). Diffusion gradient moments m0 and m1
are nulled to reduce motion sensitivity. Stimulated echoes are acquired by
applying a strong dephasing gradient (red) in the slice-selection direction
before tip-up in combination with rephasing gradients in the TSE readout.
Rephasing gradients were balanced to satisfy the CPMG condition. The proposed sequence was validated at 3T (Ingenia,
Philips). A homogeneous gel phantom was scanned by DW-EPI, DP-TSE, DPsti-TSE,
and DPsti-TSE with flip-angle (FA) sweep. Seven b-values (0-800s/mm
2)
were applied. For validation purposes, phase encoding gradients were disabled
to obtain transient signals. ADC values were obtained at each echo location by
fitting the transient signals S
b,t to S
b,t = S
0,t ×e
(-b×ADCt).
The prostate of a healthy volunteer (23y-M) was
scanned. Low- and high-resolution DW images were obtained at 4 different
b-values using both 3D DPsti-TSE with FA sweep and 2D DW-EPI sequences. From
these images, pixel-wise ADC and corresponding R
2 maps were
calculated. Anatomical
T2w images with equal resolutions were used to assess image
distortion in DWI. Detailed scan parameters are listed in Table 1.
Results
In the phantom
experiment (Figure-2), the ADC
t from DW-EPI was stable throughout
the EPI readout with a value of (1.99±0.02)×10
-3mm
2/s.
For the DP-TSE sequence, the ADC
t was severely overestimated at (3.64±0.05)×10
-3mm
2/s,
caused by eddy currents induced signal losses. As expected, ADC values for the
DPsti-TSE (2.03±0.03)×10
-3mm
2/s and DPsti-TSE with FA
sweep (2.11±0.03)×10
-3mm
2/s were close to the DW-EPI
reference values. For the latter, the ADC
t was constant for the full
TSE shot of 990ms, whereas ADC values were constant for only 20ms, 345ms, and
420ms in DW-EPI, DP-TSE, and DPsti-TSE sequences, respectively. For the vivo
DW-EPI scans (Figure-3), the prostate as well as other surrounding tissues were
distorted in comparison to the T2w scans. In contrast, the DPsti-TSE did not
suffer from such geometrical distortions. Low-resolution ADC maps were similar
between DW-EPI and DPsti-STE, with mean ADC values in the prostate transition zone of (1.5±0.2)×10
-3mm
2/s
and (1.4±0.2)×10
-3mm
2/s, respectively. More importantly, at
higher resolution ADC values from DPsti-TSE remained unchanged (1.5±0.2)×10
-3mm
2/s while for DW-EPI, high-resolution ADC maps were characterized by lower R
2
values and a lower mean ADC of (1.3±0.3)×10
-3mm
2/s.
Discussion
Phantom experiments demonstrated that the DPsti-TSE sequence provides correct ADC estimations in the
presence of eddy currents. Furthermore, correct diffusion-weighting is
maintained during the entire FA sweep, enabling time-efficient high-resolution
3D DWI. Eddy currents induced spin dispersion by the strong diffusion gradients is a problem for both the DW-EPI and DP-TSE sequences. Whereas in DW-EPI eddy
currents lead to the well-known geometrical image distortions, in DP-TSE they
cause signal losses due to the flip-up RF pulse and spoiler gradient and the
end of the DP module. In the DPsti-TSE sequence eddy currents in the DP module (collectively indicated by the shaded gray gradient surface in Figure 1) cause
neither distortions nor signal losses, because the eddy currents merely cause a
shift of the echo position which has no influence on image quality. Because of
the stimulated-echo readout signal is reduced by a constant factor ½. Nevertheless,
SNR was still sufficient for acquisition of high resolution 3D
diffusion-weighted images of the prostate.
Conclusion
In
this study, a stimulated echo based diffusion-prepared 3D TSE sequence was presented.
The sequence can be applied for high-resolution distortion-free DWI of the
prostate. We are currently implementing this sequence into a standard prostate cancer patient imaging protocol to further assess its performance.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1]Koh et al. AJR, 188.6(2007):1622-1635. [2]Miao et al. EJR, 61.2(2007):297-302. [3]D. Le Bihan et al. JMRI, vol.24,no.3,pp.478–488,2006. [4]U. Sinha et al. JMRI,
vol.6,no.4,pp.657–666,1996. [5]Y. Xie et
al. JCMR, vol.16,no.1,pp.1–10,2014.