Rapid Water-Fat Separation using 3D VFA GRASE with Phase-Independent Reconstruction
Hahnsung Kim1 and Jaeseok Park2

1Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, Korea, Republic of, 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea, Republic of

Synopsis

Most water-fat separation methods based on chemical shift effect require multiple image acquisitions at different echo times, which prolong the total scanning time. Recently, to resolve aforementioned problems, variable-flip-angle (VFA) fast/turbo SE is developed. In addition, partial Fourier and/or parallel imaging techniques are incorporated with VFA fast/turbo SE imaging to speed up acquisition time but directly trade off with signal-to-noise ratio. To avoid multiple measurements and to tackle spatially variant noise amplification, we develop a novel water-fat separation method employing: 1) single-slab 3D VFA GRASE using phase-encoding blips for imaging time efficiency, 2) phase-independent reconstruction exploiting spatially complementary information along the echo direction, and 3) phase-corrected water-fat separation method using robust field distribution.

Introduction

Most water-fat separation methods based on chemical shift effect require multiple image acquisitions at different echo times, which prolong the total scanning time. Fast/turbo SE-based Dixon implementations are introduced to address long imaging time and multiple measurements1, but these techniques are still inefficient for 3D volumetric imaging due to signal modulation along the echo train. Recently, to resolve aforementioned problems, variable-flip-angle (VFA) fast/turbo SE is developed2. In addition, partial Fourier and/or parallel imaging techniques are incorporated with VFA fast/turbo SE imaging to speed up acquisition time but directly trade off with signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). To avoid multiple measurements and to tackle spatially variant noise amplification, we develop a novel water-fat separation method employing: 1) single-slab 3D VFA GRASE using phase-encoding blips for imaging time efficiency3, 2) phase-independent reconstruction exploiting spatially complementary information along the echo direction3, and 3) phase-corrected water-fat separation method using robust field distribution.

Sequence design and Reconstruction

The proposed 3D VFA GRASE for rapid water-fat separation is shown in Fig.1, consisting of spatially non-selective excitation RF pulse followed by short, non-selective refocusing pulse trains with variable flip angles based on tissue-specific prescribed signal evolution, multiple readout gradients and phase-encoding blips like EPI fashion. Multiple echoes are shifted to -5π/6, π/2, and 11π/6 relative to the spin echo, which yield maximum SNR for all combination of water and fat within a voxel in fast/turbo SE imaging4. Each echo is grouped, and then phase-independent reconstruction is exploited to suppress spatially variant noise amplification and to preserve its phase information3. Prior to applying the water-fat separation algorithm, phase errors caused by switching the readout gradient polarities are estimated from projection data acquired in the phase-correction module (Fig.1), consisting of: 1) the polarities of the readout gradients in the phase-correction module are the same as those in the VFA GRASE imaging module, 2) the polarities of the readout gradients in the phase-correction module are flipped relative to the readout gradients in the VFA GRASE imaging module, and 3) turning off the phase-encoding gradient. For nth echo, the estimated phase error, $$$\phi_{n}(x)=angle(pc_{1}g_{n}(x)/pc_{2}g_{n}(x))$$$, where x indicates the image domain, is fit to a polynomial, and then is subtracted from each echo image to align each k-space central position. In water-fat separation algorithm, robust field distribution is estimated using combined approach of region-growing and multi-scale method, wherein region-growing at the coarsest resolution and propagating the resulting estimates to the finer resolutions5. Thus, water and fat separated images can be obtained from multiple echo images demodulated field distribution.

Materials and Methods

Knee data was acquired in a healthy volunteer at 3T whole-body MR scanner (MAGNETOM Trio, Siemens Medical solutions) using an 8-channel transmit-receive knee coil. High resolution T2-weighted knee images in the sagittal orientation with pseudo-linear reordering using conventional single-slab 3D VFA fast/turbo SE and the proposed 3D VFA GRASE to show the effectiveness of the latter in increasing time-efficiency over the former. The common imaging parameters were: TR/TEeff = 2000ms/61ms, FOV = 153x153mm2, in-plane matrix = 256x256, number of partitions = 144, readout bandwidth = 849Hz/Pix, echo spacing = 8.12ms, echo train length = 40, and shifting time with respect to the spin echo time = -0.4ms/1.2ms/2.8ms. Those specific to the proposed method were: EPI factor = 3, measurement = 1, number of self-calibrating signals for phase-independent reconstruction = 32x32, and imaging time = 8min 37sec. Those specific to the conventional method were: EPI factor = 1, measurement = 3, and imaging time = 75min. Those specific to the accelerated version of the conventional method were: EPI factor = 1, measurement = 3, subsampling factor in ky-kz space = 3, number of self-calibrating signals for conventional parallel imaging = 32x32, and imaging time = 25min 51sec. For PD-weighted knee images, center in-out reordering is exploited and imaging parameters are same as that for T2-weighted knee imaging except for TR/TE = 1700ms/24ms.

Results

Water-fat separation without phase-correction to VFA GRASE leads to failed separation while complete water and fat separated images are achieved by applying phase-correction in readout direction (Fig.2). Fig.3 and Fig.4 represent T2- and PD-weighted knee water-only images, respectively. Fig.3 and Fig.4 demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed VFA GRASE over the conventional method in imaging efficiency without apparent artifacts and noise amplification. Imaging time of the proposed method is reduced 3-fold and 9-fold than that of version of the conventional method with and without acceleration, respectively.

Conclusion

The proposed 3D VFA GRASE effectively improves imaging efficiency without apparent loss of signal and image contrast to obtain water-fat separated imaging.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by IBS-R015-D1.

References

1. Ma J, et al. Fast spin-echo triple-echo dixon (fTED) technique for efficient T2-weighted water and fat imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58(1):103-109.

2. Madhuranthakam AJ, et al. T2-weighted 3D fast spin echo imaging with water-fat separation in a single acquisition. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2010;32(3):745-751.

3. Kim H, et al. Variable-flip-angle single-slab 3D GRASE imaging with phase-independent image reconstruction. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73(3):1041-1052.

4. Reeder SB, et.al. Multicoil Dixon chemical species separation with an iterative least-squares estimation method. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51(1):35-45.

5. Lu W, et.al. Multiresolution field map estimation using golden section search for water-fat separation. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60(1):236-244.

Figures

Fig1. A schematic and timing diagram for the phase-correction scan and the imaging scan in the proposed, 3D VFA GRASE pulse sequence.


Fig2. Knee water and fat images obtained from proposed 3D VFA GRASE imaging (a) without and (b) with phase-correction.

Fig3. Comparison of T2-weighted knee water images acquired using: (a) conventional single-slab 3D VFA fast/turbo SE imaging, (b) 3-fold accelerated version of the conventional method, and (c) the proposed 3D VFA GRASE imaging with phase-independent reconstruction. A spatial resolution of 0.6x0.6x1.0mm3 interpolated to 0.6x0.6x0.6mm3.

Fig4. Comparison of PD-weighted knee water images acquired using: (a) conventional single-slab 3D VFA fast/turbo SE imaging, (b) 3-fold accelerated version of the conventional method, and (c) the proposed 3D VFA GRASE imaging with phase-independent reconstruction. A spatial resolution of 0.6x0.6x1.0mm3 interpolated to 0.6x0.6x0.6mm3.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0571