Synopsis
IDEAL fat/water imaging often suffers from estimation errors such as fat/water swaps, which can't be removed even by sophisticated algorithms based on field map smoothness regularization. However, these errors may be minimized by supplying the
algorithms with an adequate FM prior, which, however, is not generally available. We propose a new method to improve IDEAL robustness which exploits a
phenomenon of absence of magnetization transfer (MT) effect in fat for estimation of sufficiently accurate IDEAL field map prior.Purpose
IDEAL (Iterative Decomposition of water and fat with
Echo Asymmetry and Least-squares) is an efficient
approach for separation of fat and water (F/W) MRI signals
1. IDEAL
algorithms achieve high accuracy by modeling F/W jointly with the magnetic
field inhomogeneity (field map, FM) and, for gradient echo sequences, $$$T_2^*$$$ decay. Yet, IDEAL
must contend with inherent uncertainties arising from the competing sources of
off-resonance (i.e., fat chemical shift and field inhomogeneity). The
associated local minima of the nonlinear objective function, when trapped into,
may lead to significant errors (e.g., F/W swaps).
To reduce these errors, the algorithms typically exploit FM smoothness
assumption
2, which may fail in case of significant field inhomogeneities.
Theoretically, these errors may be also minimized by supplying the algorithms
with an adequate FM prior; however, FM pre-estimation from IDEAL images is
again confronted by fat interference. Here, we present a novel method to
increase IDEAL robustness which exploits a phenomenon of absence of
magnetization transfer (MT) effect in fat to attain fat-insensitive FM
pre-estimation.
Theory
As
demonstrated recently3,4, off-resonance
MT saturation does not have
a detectable effect on the fat signal when applied far from on-resonance
(offset frequency $$$\Delta$$$>2.5 kHz5) to avoid direct
saturation. This insensitivity is due to absence of efficient mechanisms to
transfer magnetization from fat to either water or tissue macromolecular (protein/membrane
phospholipid) protons3.
Simultaneously, the pulse attenuates water via MT exchange between saturated tissue
macromolecules and water protons. Let’s assume that all parameters
affecting fat (e.g., repetition time TR, excitation flip angle) are kept the
same between two scans acquired without and with MT saturation. Then, the complex-valued
subtraction of corresponding images $$$S_n^{off}$$$, $$$S_n^{on}$$$ at $$$n^{th}$$$ echo time $$$t_n$$$ creates MT-attenuated images without fat signal (Fig. 1):
$$S_{W,n}=S_n^{off}-S_n^{on}=(1-A_{MT})We^{-t_n/T_2^*}e^{i\phi t_n}$$
Here, $$$A_{mt}$$$ is MT attenuation, W is water signal, and $$$\phi$$$ is FM. As the fat signal is
eliminated, FM can now be robustly calculated in MT-attenuated tissues from $$$S_{W,n}$$$ using standard phase difference methods6 and approximated in
the whole object using interpolation-based estimation.
Methods
All experiments
were performed on a 3.0T GE MR750 (Waukesha, WI). Full-resolution IDEAL scan was
followed by low-resolution MT-IDEAL in which MT pulse was positioned in place
of later echoes to maintain same TR=23ms (Fig. 2). Other parameters included: 1) IDEAL: TE=[1.5 3.3 5.0 6.7 8.4 10.2 11.9 13.6]ms,
192x160 matrix; 2) MT-IDEAL: TE=[1.5 3.3 5.0]ms, 8-ms, 600 dgr Fermi-shaped MT pulse, $$$\Delta$$$=3 kHz, 192x16 matrix). MT-IDEAL
images were subtracted from resolution-matched IDEAL images to yield $$$S_{W,n}$$$ MT-based FM estimation included calculation of phase difference $$$angle[S_{W,3} \cdot conj(S_{W,2})]$$$ , phase unwrapping
6 and nonlinear
interpolation/smoothing. (The first echo was not included to avoid its
prominent phase errors
7). The interpolation-based
refinement was implemented as a moving local 2D quadratic fit
8 weighted by MT-attenuated
image $$$|S_{W,2}|$$$ serving
as a measure of confidence of the input FM values. The
phase-difference processing was also applied directly to IDEAL data without MT
IDEAL subtraction to FM prior without fat correction with proposed fat-free MT-based
FM. All FMs were used to initialize both
standard (non-regularized) IDEAL
1 and
IDEAL with FM smoothness regularization
2.
Results
Figure 3 demonstrates that initialization of non-regularized
IDEAL with the proposed MT-based FM resolves F/W swaps observed for default zero-valued
initialization. Figure 4 shows that initializing regularized IDEAL by MT-based FM
significantly improves accuracy of F/W separation when field variations are
significant. FM obtained without MT IDEAL subtraction does not improve separation
confirming that proposed MT-based fat correction is critical to obtain prior FM
estimate of sufficient accuracy.
Discussion
The
proposed method improves robustness of IDEAL by enabling FM pre-estimation
without fat interference. In scenarios with moderate inhomogeneity, our
approach improves F/W separation even without computationally demanding FM
smoothness regularization (Fig. 3). As MT-based FM initialization facilitates
convergence to the correct minima of the objective function, it may improve F/W
estimation in suboptimal imaging conditions such as significant field
inhomogeneities (Fig. 4) and non-uniform/non-optimized echo spacing. Our
approach leads to moderate scan time increase (~10%). This overhead may be
reduced in protocols using GRAPPA
9 to 5% and 2.5% for
2x and 4x accelerations, correspondingly, if the extra MT-IDEAL scan is
utilized for GRAPPA calibration thereby avoiding acquisition of fully sampled
k-space center of IDEAL dataset. OuÂr method relies
on existence of MT-sensitive tissues, which are naturally abundant in human
body (e.g. brain, muscles, collagen-containing tissues, liver). We found
that interpolation/smoothing processing yields FM estimate in MT-insensitive
tissues (fat, fluids) sufficiently accurate for efficient initialization of
IDEAL algorithms. Alternatively, the MT-based FM prior can
be incorporated into probabilistic IDEAL framework
10 or can be used for initialization of seed areas in region growing algorithms
11.
Acknowledgements
The
work was supported by NIH (R21EB018483). We are thankful to Drs. Diego Hernando
and Samir Sharma for useful discussions. References
1. Reeder
SB, Pineda AR, Wen Z, Shimakawa A, Yu H, Brittain JH, Gold GE, Beaulieu CH,
Pelc NJ. Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and
least-squares estimation (IDEAL): application with fast spin-echo imaging. Magn
Reson Med 2005;54(3):636-644.
2. Hernando
D, Haldar JP, Sutton BP, Ma J, Kellman P, Liang ZP. Joint estimation of
water/fat images and field inhomogeneity map. Magn Reson Med
2008;59(3):571-580.
3. Chen
JH, Sambol EB, Decarolis P, O'Connor R, Geha RC, Wu YV, Singer S.
High-resolution MAS NMR spectroscopy detection of the spin magnetization
exchange by cross-relaxation and chemical exchange in intact cell lines and
human tissue specimens. Magn Reson Med 2006;55(6):1246-1256.
4. Chen
JH, Le HC, Koutcher JA, Singer S. Fat-free MRI based on magnetization exchange.
Magn Reson Med 2010;63(3):713-718.
5. Portnoy
S, Stanisz GJ. Modeling pulsed magnetization transfer. Magn Reson Med
2007;58(1):144-155.
6. Jezzard
P, Balaban RS. Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from
B0 field variations. Magn Reson Med 1995;34(1):65-73.
7. Hernando
D, Hines CD, Yu H, Reeder SB. Addressing phase errors in fat-water imaging
using a mixed magnitude/complex fitting method. Magn Reson Med
2012;67(3):638-644.
8. Pruessmann
KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast
MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42(5):952-962.
9. Griswold
MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, Nittka M, Jellus V, Wang J, Kiefer B, Haase A.
Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn
Reson Med 2002;47(6):1202-1210.
10. Yu
H, Reeder SB, Shimakawa A, McKenzie CA, Brittain JH. Robust multipoint
water-fat separation using fat likelihood analysis. Magn Reson Med
2012;67(4):1065-1076.
11. Yu H, Reeder
SB, Shimakawa A, Brittain JH, Pelc NJ. Field map estimation with a region
growing scheme for iterative 3-point water-fat decomposition. Magn Reson Med
2005;54(4):1032-1039.