Rosita Shishegar1,2, Shreya Rana3, Mary Tolcos3, David W. Walker3, and Leigh A. Johnston1,4
1Dept. Electrical & Electronic Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 2NICTA Victoria Research Laboratory, Melbourne, Australia, 3The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 4Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia
Synopsis
Segmentation of the developing
cortical plate from MRI data of the fetal brain is highly challenging due to
partial volume effects, low contrast and heterogeneous maturation caused by
ongoing myelination processes. We present a new atlas-free method for
segmenting the boundary between the cortical plate and subplate in fetal brains,
by exploiting diffusion-weighted imaging cues. The accuracy of the segmentation
algorithm is demonstrated by application to fetal sheep brain MRI data.Purpose
Segmentation of the developing fetal brain from MRI data
is challenging due to partial volume effects, low contrast across brain regions
and heterogeneous myelination states of the developing white matter [1,2]. Segmentation
of the boundary between the cortical plate and the subplate is needed for the
study of normal fetal brain development and neurodevelopmental disorders [1,2]. The
most commonly applied segmentation techniques are based on training datasets or
a reference atlas [3,4,5], for example the widely used Freesurfer segmentation tool
[5], however such information may not be available for brains at specific
developmental time-points in all species.
We present an atlas-free method for segmentation of the
cortical plate/subplate interface in fetal sheep brain MRI images using cues
derived from diffusion-weighted image data. Our method is applied to extracted brains that are embedded in agar prior to scanning; while the segmentation of
extracted brains may sound straight-forward, in practice it is challenging due
background inhomogeneities and the folded nature of the cortex. The background
is heterogeneous due to fixative fluid remaining around the brain and filling the
sulci prior to embedding in agar. Our method exploits the relatively high
fractional anisotropy (FA) of the cortex in the developing brain, and uses
tractography and cortical thickness to identify developing fibre tracts that
also display relatively high FA and otherwise confound the cortical plate
segmentation. With strong image features derived from the diffusion-weighted
data, segmentation proceeds via a standard level set technique.
Methods: Segmentation algorithm
The proposed algorithm consists of three steps (Fig. 1). 1. A
coarse outer mask of the brain is computed by morphological opening and closing operations
on the average of diffusion-weighted images. This provides a boundary along the
inferior surface of the extracted brains where the cortical plate is absent. 2. Streamlines tractography (MRtrix) is performed to extract streamlines
that both exceed a length threshold and an FA threshold.These long tracts do not
intersect the cortical plate, as the subplate is a region of low FA that therefore
serves to isolate the cortical plate from the streamlines underneath.The lengths
of tracts that originate in the cortex are limited to the cortical thickness, due
to the cortical plate anisotropy being perpendicular to the surface. The locations
of the streamlines are masked to a representative background level in the FA
images. 3. Level set contour evolution based on region competition is applied to
the computed diffusion-weighted cue (ITK-SNAP) [6]. The contour at time
$$$t$$$ is formulated as $$$c_{t}=(\alpha\widetilde{g_{I}}-\beta \kappa)\overline{n}$$$,
where the first term is the external force computed from the gradient magnitude, $$$g_{I}$$$,
of the FA image, $$$I$$$, the second term
is the internal force base on contour mean curvature, $$$\kappa$$$.
Both components are applied along the normal vector of the contour, $$$\overline{n}$$$.The
tuning parameters $$$\alpha$$$ and
$$$\beta$$$ are chosen to be 1 and 0.75,
respectively. The contour evolution initiates from a small sphere situated at
the center of the brain and runs for $$$1000$$$ iterations.
Methods: Experimental data
Fetal sheep brains of 90 days gestational age
(dga) were perfusion fixed, extracted and suspended in agar gel. Samples were scanned on a Brüker 4.7T small
animal MRI system equipped with a BGA-12S gradient set. Diffusion-weighted
images were acquired using a DTI-EPI acquisition with TE/TR=65/3000
ms, b=6000
s/mm2, 81 gradient directions,
10 b0-images, resolution of 250
µm-isotropic, matrix size 140$$$\times$$$104$$$\times$$$76, $$$\delta$$$=7
ms, $$$\Delta$$$=20
ms.
Results
The non-diffusion weighted images (Fig.2a) for an
exemplar 90-dga brain demonstrate the background inhomogeneity, evident in the
white border (fixative) around the cortical surface and partially filling the
sulci, surrounded by agar gel (gray).
The coarse mask (algorithm step 1) is applied to the FA images (Fig.2b). The segmentation of the cortical plate/subplate boundary proceeds after masking using streamlines tractography results
(Fig. 2c). The automated boundary detection is visually highly consistent with
manual ground-truth results (Fig. 2d). Validation of the segmentation results is
presented in Fig. 3. Surface distance between automated and manually extracted
surfaces show minimal variation.The segmentation error is 0.29$$$\pm$$$0.31mm,
highlighting the accuracy of our method.
Conclusion
We have proposed a segmentation method for extracting
the cortical plate/subplate boundary from fetal brain MRI data.The proposed
method is independent of a reference atlas, and so it is applicable to both
normal and pathological brains of any species. In future work, we plan to
increase the efficiency of the method through inclusion of further diffusion-weighted
imaging cues such as the principal tensor direction to lead the contour
evolution.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Devi et al. (2015) Comput. Biol. Med., 64: 163-178. 2. Leroy et al. (2011) PLoS One, 6(11): e27128. 3. Wang et al. (2014) NeuroImage, 89: 152-164.4. Wang et al. (2015) NeuroImage, 108:160-172. 5. Fischl (2012) NeuroImage,
62(2): 774-781.6.
Yushkevich et al. (2005) Insight Jounral 1 special issue on ISC.