Longchuan Li1,2, Sarah Shultz1, Xiaoping Hu2, Ami Klin1, and Warren Jones1
1Marcus Autism Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States, 2Biomedical Imaging Technology Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
Synopsis
We used diffusion tractography and
network theory to examine the organizational development of the brain in
typical infants in their first 6 months of life. Data were longitudinally
sampled at randomized time points between birth and 6 months and collected on a
Siemens 3T TIM Trio system with 32-channel coil using multiband techniques. We
found that network-based metrics may reveal unique information in the
organizational principles of the brain and its development that is impossible
with conventional methods focusing on specific pathways and regions,
demonstrating the usefulness of the approach in studying early typical brain
development and its disruptions.Introduction
Recent advances in graph theory and
its application in brain imaging science (i.e., brain connectomes) have shed
tremendous light on organizational principles of brain structure and function[1].
However, research utilizing the technique to study the development of infant brain
networks longitudinally is still rare. Such work will reveal new information about
the postnatal maturation of brain structure and function and may be served as
benchmarks against which the atypical development of brain organizations in
infants affected by neurodevelopmental disorders can be compared.
Methods
14 typically developing infants (corrected
gestational age: 34-211 days, 4 females) were imaged up to 3 times during natural
sleep in the first 6 months of life, resulting in 21 scans in total. Diffusion
data were collected on a Siemens Trio TIM system with a 32-channel head coil using
the multiband technique. Imaging parameters are: MB factor of 2, TR/TE=6200/74ms,
FOV=184×184, matrix size of 92×92, diffusion directions of 61 with 6
b=0 images and a b-value of 700. The TR, b-value and MB factors were selected as
a trade-off between signal-to-noise-ratio, scan time and minimal table
vibration from the scanner. Streamline probabilistic tractography based on the
outputs of ‘bedpostx’ in FSL was implemented in Camino, with 50 samples in each
voxel of the whole brain, achieving approximately 7 million streamlines in each
subject. To reconstruct structural brain networks, we assume that patterns of
macro-scale region-to-region connections (i.e., brain connectivity pattern) in
the brain of infants at different ages will be largely constant. It is the brain
connectivity efficacy (defined as the inverse of the mean radial diffusivity
(RD)) along the pathway linking the two regions that changes over time[2]. As a
result, we first derived connectional matrices of 90 brain regions (AAL atlas)
in 14 typical infant brains and then thresholded the averaged connectivity
matrix at a network density of 10% to define brain connectivity pattern in this
cohort. The weights (i.e., brain connectivity efficacy) of brain networks in
each subject were quantified by the mean of 1/RD. We then examined the most
critical brain regions (i.e., hubs), the modular structure, as well as the
relationships between graph-theoretic metrics and age for insights into developmental
changes in brain networks over time.
Results
Streamline probabilistic
tractography can reliably track even secondary white matter pathways (i.e.,
AMG-VMPFC pathway) in infants with the age included in our study (Fig.1A). When
ranking the top 20% brain regions based on three centrality metrics[3], we
found brain hubs in infants from 0 to 6 months mainly located at subcortical, posterior
cingulate, precuneus and occipital regions, whereas such hubs lack in frontal
and temporal lobes (Fig.1B)[4]. Infant brain networks have modular structure,
which is largely symmetrical and can be divided into one module covering
occipital and temporal lobes and another covering frontal, sensorimotor and
subcortical regions (Fig.1C). Global efficiency of whole brain networks increases
with age(R=0.94, P<1.8e-10), but small-worldness decreases over time, similar
to that in the previous work on older infants (Fig.1D)[5]. The topological
roles of each brain region in structural brain networks of infants vary with
time and have divergent trends: Using betweenness centrality (BC), bilateral
thalamus and right pre- and post- central gyri have decreasing centrality with
age (Fig.1E), even though the averaged connectivity strength (as measured by
1/RD) in these regions increases as the function of time (Fig.1E right column).
In contrast, several cortical regions, such as left posterior cingulate gyrus
(CINGpost), left middle frontal gyrus (MFG), right angular gyrus (ANGU) and
right inferior occipital lobe (IOC) have increased BC with age, indicating
their increasingly important roles in infant brain networks (Fig.1E).
Discussion
Our optimized network analysis framework
enables us to probe into the spatial and temporal details of brain networks of
infants. Our findings also map onto the sequences of early brain myelination[6]
and are consistent with previous infant studies using different methods and/or with
older age ranges. In sum, graph-theoretic approach on neuroimaging data may serve
as a unique and powerful tool for filing our knowledge gap in early brain development[7].
Such a detailed benchmark of unfolding networks will enable probing of
mechanistic hypotheses regarding spatial-temporal disruptions of brain
development in early-emerging neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism
spectrum disorder[8].
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by NIMH (P50-MH100029), R21 MH105816-01A1, The John Templeton
Foundation, NICHD (5R01HD077623).References
[1] Hagmann, et al., PLoS Biol 6.7 (2008): e159;
[2] Hagmann, et al., PNAS. 107.44 (2010): 19067-19072;
[3] Li,
Longchuan, et al., Neuroimage 80 (2013): 462-474;
[4] Fransson,
Peter, et al.,Cerebral Cortex 21.1 (2011): 145-154;
[5] Huang, Hao,
et al., Cerebral Cortex 25.5 (2015): 1389-1404;
[6] Yakovlev,
Paul I., and A. Roch Lecours, (1967): 3-70;
[7] Johnson, Nat Rev Neurosci. 2.7 (2001): 475-483;
[8] Klin, et al.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 50 (2015):
189-203.