Use of comprehensive MRI to assess cartilage composition in patients with acute cartilage injury
Didier Laurent1, Stefan Zbyn2, Vladimir Mlynarik2, Markus Schreiner2, Pavol Szomolanyi2, Nicole Getzmann1, Harry Haber1, Joerg Goldhahn1, Stefan Marlovits3, and Siegfried Trattnig2

1Novartis Institutes fo Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland, 2Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 3Department of Traumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Synopsis

A comprehensive MRI approach was implemented to assess cartilage macromolecular composition in patients with acute cartilage injury. Differences in T2 relaxation and gagCEST asymmetry values were observed between the defective and adjacent regions in the tibio-femoral cartilage. Preliminary results indicate that the combination of T2 mapping with gagCEST scans at 7T may be reproducible and sensitive enough to monitor early cartilage degeneration, and thus may be considered as a good alternative to cartilage biopsies in future clinical trials on new therapies aimed at cartilage regeneration.

Target audience

Physicians, radiologists and clinical pharmacologists interested in the pathophysiology of cartilage diseases and monitoring of the repair process.

Introduction

Cartilage degeneration or defective repair after an injury is typically associated with changes in the macromolecular composition and bi-layer organization. Thus, roughening of the articular surface results from cartilage fibrillation, a process involving denaturation of the collagen fibrils and fragmentation of the collagen network. Glycosaminoglycans (GAG), which contribute to tissue stiffness through hydration of the extracellular matrix, are also lost prior to early visible signs of degeneration, leading to an impaired biomechanical support function, which itself contributes to degradation of cartilage. Any repair of the defect is challenging to monitor and a non-invasive comprehensive MRI approach may then be considered as a good alternative to cartilage biopsies.

T2 mapping appears well adapted for collagen network evaluation. Thus, a lack of T2 variation across cartilage sub-layers may reflect a low degree of collagen fibril organization1. Meanwhile, GAG levels, as measured by GAG chemical exchange saturation transfer (gagCEST) MRI at 7T2, were found to agree well with (23Na)-MRI results3. However, gagCEST performance at 3T is still not clearly demonstrated and the optimal use of biomarkers to monitor changes in cartilage quality at 3T or 7T requires further characterization.

Here we show preliminary results obtained from an observational study in which T2 and gagCEST measurements were combined to investigate how reliably damage progression can be detected in patients with acute cartilage injury and additional risk factors for further cartilage destruction.

Methods

Imaging sessions were performed on 7 patients with cartilage defect(s) in the knee joint (ICRS 1/2) as well as high risk factors for further progression into ICRS 3/4. Cartilage T2 and gagCEST images were obtained for all patients at 7T and 3T. T2 maps were reconstructed from images obtained using a 3D-Triple Echo Steady State sequence (3D-TESS: TR/TE 11.14/5.06 ms, resolution 0.25x0.25x3 mm3). For gagCEST imaging, a series of ten 60-ms adiabatic full passage hs2 RF pulses followed by spoiling gradients in all 3 directions with interpulse delays of 20 ms preceded the 3D RF-spoiled GRE sequence (TR/TE 7.9/3.15 ms, resolution 0.9x0.9x2.2 mm3). Nineteen scans with equidistant (92 Hz and 39 Hz at 7T and 3T, respectively) offsets in the range of ±2.8 ppm around the water resonance and a scan without saturation were collected. Then, Z-spectra were constructed from registered images on a pixel-by-pixel basis and asymmetry of the Z-spectra calculated from integrals over the offset range ±∂=0.6–1.8ppm relative to the minimum of each individual Z-spectrum. Regions-of-interest were defined from 2D-TSE morphological images in the suspicious regions for defective and normal appearing cartilage, and transferred to T2 and gagCEST images for quantitative analysis. All measurements were repeated 8 days later for variability assessment.

Results

Cartilage damage could clearly be identified in the tibio-femoral region from T2map and gagCEST images, but not from morphological MR images (Fig.1). At 7T, gagCEST asymmetry values (N=5, preliminary data) appeared to be ~28% lower in the defective vs healthy cartilage regions (3.06±2.18% vs 4.27±1.61%, NS), however were associated with substantial inter-individual variability. These results could not be confirmed from gagCEST measurements at 3T, which in some cases generated negative asymmetry values. (Superficial/Deep)T2 ratios also showed ~20% greater (NS) values in the defective vs healthy cartilage regions, both at 7T and 3T (7T: 0.81±0.22 vs 0.68±0.10; 3T: 0.75±0.18 vs 0.67±0.07). These T2 measurements showed high reproducibility between baseline and day-8 (ICCs at 7T: 0.82 to 0.69, and at 3T: 0.67 to 0.60 depending on the cartilage layer). Good reproducibility was also observed for gagCEST measurements at 7T.

Discussion

Test-retest results showed that T2 mapping may be reproducible and precise enough to monitor small changes in the collagen fibril network at 7 T and 3T. Similar changes in GAG concentration appear to be more challenging to detect, especially at 3T. In accordance with a previous study4, asymmetry values from gagCEST measurements at 3 T were found to be very low, with negative values most likely reflecting contribution of a larger exchange-relayed NOE through the aliphatic protons resonating upfield from water5. Alternatively, the gagCEST method could be replaced by sodium MRI, despite the need for specialized hardware and software. Yet, these preliminary results support the use of a comprehensive MRI approach to differentiate early formation of hyaline from fibrotic cartilage, and eventually monitor beneficial effects of new cartilage regenerating drugs, without resorting to serial biopsies. Given the serious pitfalls of gagCEST at 3T and the difficulty to access high field scanners, the conduct of multiple-site studies at 7T may however still be challenging.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Welsch GH et al. Cartilage T2 assessment at 3-T MR imaging: in vivo differentiation of normal hyaline cartilage from reparative tissue after two cartilage repair procedures - initial experience. Radiology 2008; 247:154-61.

2. Ling W et al. Assessment of glycosaminoglycan concentration in vivo by chemical exchange-dependent saturation transfer (gagCEST). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 2266–70.

3. Schmitt B et al. Cartilage quality assessment by using glycosaminoglycan chemical exchange saturation transfer and (23)Na MR imaging at 7T. Radiology 2011; 260(1):257-64.

4. Schleich C et al. Glycosaminoglycan chemical exchange saturation transfer at 3T MRI in asymptomatic knee joints. Acta Radiol, DOI:10.1177/0284185115598811.

5. Zaiss M, Bachert P. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and MR Z-spectroscopy in vivo: a review of theoretical approaches and methods. Phys Med Biol 2013; 58(22):R221-69

Figures

gagCEST and T2 map images from a patient with cartilage injury Arrows indicate the defective cartilage region.

T2map and gagCEST variability assessment at 7T and 3T



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0539