Didier Laurent1, Stefan Zbyn2, Vladimir Mlynarik2, Markus Schreiner2, Pavol Szomolanyi2, Nicole Getzmann1, Harry Haber1, Joerg Goldhahn1, Stefan Marlovits3, and Siegfried Trattnig2
1Novartis Institutes fo Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland, 2Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 3Department of Traumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Synopsis
A comprehensive MRI
approach was implemented to assess cartilage macromolecular composition in
patients with acute cartilage injury. Differences in T2 relaxation and gagCEST asymmetry
values were observed between the defective and adjacent regions in the tibio-femoral
cartilage. Preliminary results indicate that the combination of T2 mapping with
gagCEST scans at 7T may be reproducible and sensitive enough to monitor early
cartilage degeneration, and thus may be considered as a good alternative to
cartilage biopsies in future clinical trials on new therapies aimed at
cartilage regeneration.Target audience
Physicians, radiologists and
clinical pharmacologists interested in the pathophysiology of cartilage
diseases and monitoring of the repair process.
Introduction
Cartilage degeneration or defective repair after an injury is typically associated with changes in the macromolecular composition and bi-layer organization. Thus, roughening of the articular surface results from cartilage fibrillation, a process involving denaturation of the collagen fibrils and fragmentation of the collagen network. Glycosaminoglycans (GAG), which contribute to tissue stiffness through hydration of the extracellular matrix, are also lost prior to early visible signs of degeneration, leading to an impaired biomechanical support function, which itself contributes to degradation of cartilage. Any repair of the defect is challenging to monitor and a non-invasive comprehensive MRI approach may then be considered as a good alternative to cartilage biopsies.
T2 mapping appears well adapted for collagen network evaluation. Thus, a lack of T2 variation across cartilage sub-layers may reflect a low degree of collagen fibril organization1. Meanwhile, GAG levels, as measured by GAG chemical exchange saturation transfer (gagCEST) MRI at 7T2, were found to agree well with (23Na)-MRI results3. However, gagCEST performance at 3T is still not clearly demonstrated and the optimal use of biomarkers to monitor changes in cartilage quality at 3T or 7T requires further characterization.
Here we show preliminary results obtained from an observational study in which T2 and gagCEST measurements were combined to investigate how reliably damage progression can be detected in patients with acute cartilage injury and additional risk factors for further cartilage destruction.
Methods
Imaging sessions were performed on 7 patients with
cartilage defect(s) in the knee joint (ICRS 1/2) as well as high risk factors
for further progression into ICRS 3/4. Cartilage T2 and gagCEST images were
obtained for all patients at 7T and 3T. T2 maps were reconstructed from images
obtained using a 3D-Triple Echo Steady State sequence (3D-TESS: TR/TE 11.14/5.06
ms, resolution 0.25x0.25x3 mm
3). For gagCEST imaging, a series of ten
60-ms adiabatic full passage hs2 RF pulses followed by spoiling gradients in
all 3 directions with interpulse delays of 20 ms preceded the 3D RF-spoiled GRE
sequence (TR/TE 7.9/3.15 ms, resolution 0.9x0.9x2.2 mm
3). Nineteen scans
with equidistant (92 Hz and 39 Hz at 7T and 3T, respectively) offsets in the
range of ±2.8 ppm around the water resonance and a scan without saturation were
collected. Then, Z-spectra were constructed from registered images on a
pixel-by-pixel basis and asymmetry of the Z-spectra calculated from integrals
over the offset range ±∂=0.6–1.8ppm relative to the minimum of each individual
Z-spectrum. Regions-of-interest were defined from 2D-TSE morphological images
in the suspicious regions for defective and normal appearing cartilage, and
transferred to T2 and gagCEST images for quantitative analysis. All
measurements were repeated 8 days later for variability assessment.
Results
Cartilage damage could clearly be identified in
the tibio-femoral region from T2map and gagCEST images, but not from
morphological MR images (Fig.1). At 7T, gagCEST asymmetry values (N=5, preliminary
data) appeared to be ~28% lower in the defective
vs healthy cartilage regions (3.06±2.18% vs 4.27±1.61%,
NS), however were associated with substantial
inter-individual variability. These results could not be confirmed from gagCEST
measurements at 3T, which in some cases generated negative asymmetry values. (Superficial/Deep)T2
ratios also showed ~20% greater (NS) values in the defective
vs healthy cartilage regions, both at 7T
and 3T (7T: 0.81±0.22 vs 0.68±0.10; 3T: 0.75±0.18
vs 0.67±0.07). These T2 measurements showed high reproducibility
between baseline and day-8 (ICCs at 7T: 0.82 to 0.69, and at 3T: 0.67 to 0.60 depending
on the cartilage layer). Good reproducibility was also observed for gagCEST
measurements at 7T.
Discussion
Test-retest results showed that T2
mapping may be reproducible and precise enough to monitor small changes in the
collagen fibril network at 7 T and 3T. Similar changes in GAG concentration appear
to be more challenging to detect, especially at 3T. In accordance with a
previous study
4, asymmetry values from gagCEST measurements at 3 T were
found to be very low, with negative values most likely reflecting contribution
of a larger exchange-relayed NOE through the aliphatic protons resonating
upfield from water
5.
Alternatively, the
gagCEST method could be replaced by sodium MRI, despite the need for
specialized hardware and software.
Yet, these preliminary results support the use
of a comprehensive MRI approach to differentiate early formation of hyaline
from fibrotic cartilage, and eventually monitor beneficial effects of new cartilage
regenerating drugs, without resorting to serial biopsies. Given the serious
pitfalls of gagCEST at 3T and the difficulty to access high field scanners, the
conduct of multiple-site studies at 7T may however still be challenging.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Welsch GH et al. Cartilage T2
assessment at 3-T MR imaging: in vivo differentiation of normal hyaline
cartilage from reparative tissue after two cartilage repair procedures -
initial experience. Radiology 2008; 247:154-61.
2. Ling W et al. Assessment
of glycosaminoglycan concentration in vivo by chemical exchange-dependent
saturation transfer (gagCEST). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 2266–70.
3. Schmitt B et al. Cartilage
quality assessment by using glycosaminoglycan chemical exchange saturation
transfer and (23)Na MR imaging at 7T. Radiology 2011; 260(1):257-64.
4. Schleich C et al. Glycosaminoglycan
chemical exchange saturation transfer at 3T MRI in asymptomatic knee joints. Acta
Radiol, DOI:10.1177/0284185115598811.
5. Zaiss M,
Bachert P. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and MR Z-spectroscopy
in vivo: a review of theoretical approaches and methods. Phys Med Biol 2013;
58(22):R221-69