Sangwon Oh1, Gigi Galiana1, Dana Peters1, and R. Todd Constable1
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
Synopsis
MRI
with non-linear spatial encoding magnetic (SEM) fields was originally
introduced to realize faster gradient switching time without peripheral nerve
stimulation (PNS) 1. Since then various MRI encoding method such as O-Space,
4D-RIO, and FRONSAC have been introduced for more efficient accelerated spatial
encoding 2, 3, 4. However, these
methods are mostly focused on 2-dimensional MRI and there is uncertainty in its
applicability to 3-dimensional MRI. We apply O-Space to 3D MRI and find
practical challenges and improvement over 3D radial sequence.Purpose
MRI with non-linear spatial encoding magnetic (SEM) fields
has many advantages over conventional linear SEM MRI. To name a few faster
gradient switching time without peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS)
1,
enhanced edge resolution
2,3, higher image quality at high acceleration rates
2,4 can be the examples. However, research on MRI with non-linear SEM has
mostly focused on 2-dimensional image acquisitions. In this study, we introduce
3D O-Space, and focus on image reconstruction of 3D encoded data from single
channel receiver coil.
Method
A 3D
projection radial gradient echo sequence was modified to implement 3D O-Space sequence,
Fig.1 (a), on a 3T Siemens Tim Trio system (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen,
Germany) with a birdcage Tx coil and an 8-channel receiver coil. The number of readout point was 128 and 128 x
32 (φ x Ɵ) different sets of linear gradient fields were
used for full SEM. To generate Z2 SEM a 10 channel gradient insert from Resonance
Research Inc. (Billerica, MA, USA) was used. The basic pulse sequence is shown
below. To reconstruct the experimental data various types of
Kaczmarz methods were examined. Standard Kaczmarz solves y = Ax by minimizing
||y – Ax||
2 iteratively and choosing
i th row of A sequentially. Randomized Kaczmarz chooses
i th row randomly and update ‘x’, and randomized
Kaczmarz with a probability distribution selects
i th row with the probability. The probability comes from norm of
the
i th row, but in our case the inverse of the k-vector at the
i th row is used
5. To improve the
image quality compressed sensing (CS) is applied after Kaczmarz. One of the
biggest obstacle implementing CS in 3D non-linearly encoding system is that the
encoding matrix size is extremely large. In our case it is 2 TB, = (128 x 128 x
32)
2 x 8/1024
3. We address this issue by generating
encoding matrix with an initial condition and a difference, which has
drastically reduced the size of the encoding matrix by 64 times. This has huge benefit in speed compared to
generating every line to save memory space. Even though 16 GB is a huge memory
size but it is manageable and applicable to reconstructing highly accelerated
MRI acquisitions.
Results
& Discussion
Reconstructed
images from various methods, Regridding, standard Kaczmarz (Kaczmarz 1), randomized
Kaczmarz (Kacmarz 2), and randomized with a probability distribution (Kaczmarz
3) are shown in Fig.2. In above experiment Z2 gradient was not applied to the
sequence. Kaczmarz 1 has been shown to find a solution very efficiently in
2-dimensional cases
6, but its convergence speed is not fast enough in a
3-dimensional case. Similarly, randomizing iteration order does not improve the
convergence. Additionally, it increases background noise level as shown in
Fig.2 (c). However, Kaczmarz 3 proves its
fast convergence speed compared to the other iterative methods and results in
agreeable images compared to those from the regridding method. CS is applied to
weakly accelerated image, R = 2, and successfully denoises in the phantom
area. The less sharp image is due to
single channel acquisition which would be improved with parallel receivers.
Conclusion
Traditional
Kaczmarz converges to a solution very slowly with 3D reconstruction and this severely
limits the application of 3D O-Space. We have addressed this issue by applying
a randomized Kaczmarz with a probability distribution which becomes a fast and
precise iterative method for 3D data. Additionally, our optimized CS for 3D
non-linearly encoded data is adaptable to most acquisition strategies and
improves image quality for higher accelerations in data acquisition. Further
tests with multi-channel receiver coils and contrast detail phantoms in
presence of Z2 gradient are being investigated.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by NIH R01 EB016978-03. We appreciate
fruitful discussions with Dr. Haifeng Wang, Dr. Emre Kopanoglu, Dr. Geli Hu, Nadine Luedicke, Dr. Maolin Qui, Dr. John Onofrey, and Dr. Hermant Tagare.References
1 J. Hennig et. al, Magn. Reso. Mater. Phy. 21, 5 (2008), 2 J. Stockmann et. al, Mag. Res. Med. 64, 447 (2010), 3 D. Gallichan et.
al, Mag. Res. Med. 65, 702 (2011), 4 H. Wang et. al, Mag. Res. Med. (2015, early view), 5 T. Strohmer et. al, J.
Four. Anal. App . 15.2, 262 (2009), 6 J. Stockmann et. al, Mag. Res. Med. 69, 444 (2013)