Avery J.L. Berman1,2 and Bruce Pike2
1Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2Department of Radiology and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Synopsis
This study presents a closed-form analytical
solution that describes transverse signal relaxation using the weak field
approximation (WFA). The closed-form solution (CFS) fully describes the net
signal dynamics under any train of 180° refocusing pulses, and we show that it
is in close agreement with a commonly employed mono-exponential expression of
the WFA. We compared the CFS to simulations from a medium containing spherical
perturbers, with a focus on modelling red blood cells. The CFS and simulations
were in close agreement but the results systematically varied depending on
whether or not the spheres were allowed to overlap. This theory can be
applied in areas such as tissue iron imaging or relaxometry of blood.Purpose
Understanding the detailed nature of transverse
signal decay in the presence of magnetic perturbations plays an important role
in many fields of MRI. It is well known that observed transverse relaxation
times depend on several factors, such as the perturbation magnitude, the
interplay between spin diffusion and the spatial scale of the perturbers, and
the refocusing rate in a multi-echo spin echo (CPMG) sequence. In this study,
we present a closed-form, analytical solution for the evolution
of the net transverse magnetization from a medium using the so-called weak field
approximation (WFA).
1 We compare this analytical solution to simulations
and to an asymptotic assumption of mono-exponential decay when the medium is
composed of randomly positioned spherical perturbers. We also explore the relaxation
properties at high volume fractions, where the roles of “perturber” and “external
medium” become reversed.
2Theory & Methods
The WFA applies to systems of spins in the motional
narrowing regime and where the perturber boundaries are freely permeable.3
The formulation for how the field inhomogeneities reduce the signal magnitude
at time T is given by:1$$S(T)=\text{exp}\left\{-\frac{\gamma^2}{2}\int_0^T dt^\prime\sigma(t^\prime)\int_0^T dt\sigma(t)K\left( |t-t^\prime|\right)\right\}\qquad[1]$$where σ(t) is a spin flip function of
magnitude 1 and which changes sign upon application of any 180° pulses and K(t)
is the temporal correlation function. Jensen and Chandra derived an asymptotic
form as T$$$\rightarrow$$$∞ for how the transverse
relaxation rate would change (ΔR2) assuming mono-exponential
decay.1
While knowledge of ΔR2
may be sufficient for many applications, other applications may require a more
detailed understanding of how the MR signal decays and refocuses prior to and
after any 180°
refocusing pulses. Using the approximation proposed in (1), we have derived a closed-form
solution (CFS) to Eq. [1] that satisfies this requirement for an arbitrary
number and timing of refocusing pulses (equation omitted for space). The
perturbers considered here were randomly positioned spheres, for which G0,
the mean-square field offset, and rc, a characteristic
spatial length, are defined.1
The CFS was compared against the
asymptotic solution of Jensen and Chandra for multiple echo spacings (ΔTE). To
determine the accuracy of the WFA as it applies to intravascular signal, we
compared the CFS results to simulations of the transverse signal from multiple
networks of randomly positioned spheres populated to volume fractions (ζ)
between 3 – 75%. Two sets of distributions were considered, those where spheres
were allowed to overlap, and those where they were not. The simulations were
performed using the deterministic diffusion method in three-dimensions.4
To model red blood cells, sphere radii were set to 3 μm and the diffusion
coefficient of water was set to 2.7 μm2/ms.5
Results
Fig. 1 shows time series that were calculated using
the CFS and compares them to the solutions obtained under the assumption of
mono-exponential decay.1 These were calculated at 3 T with ζ
= 40% and susceptibility offset corresponding to a blood oxygenation of 60%.6
In the CPMG examples, ΔR2 was underestimated by less than 2% if at least three
echoes were fitted, however, this grew to 15% for the free induction decay (ΔTE
= ∞).
Fig. 2 shows sample results of the CFS overlaid on
the simulation results using ΔTE = 40 ms for ζ = 3% and 40% at multiple O2 saturations.
The root mean square error (RMSE) between the CFS and the simulations was less
than 0.015 for all simulation settings. In accordance with the WFA, these
results were from simulation networks where spheres were allowed to overlap.
Fig. 3b shows the results when the number of perturbers remained the
same as in Fig. 2b but they were not allowed to overlap.
Here
the CFS breaks down when using the true ζ; however, by scaling ζ in the CFS, the RMSE can be minimized (Fig. 3c). This scaling is well approximated by a cubic polynomial constrained to pass
through 0 when ζ = 0 or 100% (Fig. 4), and it can be interpreted
as the perturber and external medium
reversing roles.2
Conclusion
The closed-form solution to the WFA presented here
is in close agreement with simulations from sphere networks covering a wide
range of volume fractions and field offsets. In the more realistic scenario of
non-overlapping spheres, the volume fraction in the CFS must be scaled to
accurately describe the simulations; in line with experiments
7 and
theory.
2 When compared against a commonly employed model of
mono-exponential decay,
1 the two models agree. We are currently applying
the CFS to ex vivo blood relaxometry, and it is foreseen that it could be
applied in iron imaging and to calculate intravascular contributions in
simulations of BOLD imaging.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to recognize financial support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN 143290) and the Campus Alberta Innovates Program.References
1. Jensen J.H. and Chandra R.
NMR relaxation in tissues with weak magnetic inhomogeneities. Magn Res Med, 2000;44(1):144–56.
2. Kiselev V.G. and Novikov D.S. Transverse NMR
relaxation as a probe of mesoscopic structure. Phys Rev Lett, 2002;89(27):278101.
3. Sukstanskii A.L. and
Yablonskiy D.A. Gaussian approximation in the theory of MR signal formation in
the presence of structure-specific magnetic field inhomogeneities, J Magn
Reson, 2003;163(2):236-47.
4. Klassen L.M. and Menon R.S. NMR simulation analysis of statistical effects on quantifying cerebrovascular parameters. Biophys J, 2007;92(3):1014-21.
5. Stanisz G.J., Li J.G., Wright G.A., et al. Water dynamics in human blood via combined measurements of T2 relaxation and diffusion in the presence of gadolinium. Magn Reson Med, 1998;39(2):223-33.
6. Spees W.M., Yablonskiy D.A., Oswood M.C., et al. Water proton MR properties of human blood at 1.5 Tesla: magnetic susceptibility, T1, T2, T2*, and non-Lorentzian signal behavior. Magn Reson Med, 2001;45(4): 533-42.
7. Thulborn K.R., Waterton J.C., Matthews P.M., et al. Oxygenation dependence of the transverse relaxation time of water protons in whole blood at high field. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1982;714(4):265-70.