Synopsis
Dense MRI receiver arrays
face challenges associated with RF cabling, power consumption, and space
required by on-coil RF LNAs. On-coil frequency mixers and ADCs have been
proposed as solutions to these challenges. Here we propose the use of passive
N-path mixers implemented in CMOS for on-coil frequency conversion. We
demonstrate a prototype fabricated in a 0.5µm CMOS process, and compare its
measured and simulated performance. We also show simulations of a similar
design in 65nm CMOS with greatly improved performance. The improved version may
handle multiple RF channels on a single chip, and eliminates the need for RF
LNAs entirely.Purpose
Receive arrays are trending towards higher channel counts in order to
increase coverage while maintaining good SNR and enable acceleration with
parallel imaging. However, increased density poses engineering challenges,
including the physical size of on-coil LNAs and the routing of RF cables for
each channel. Prior work has explored frequency mixing on-coil for frequency
domain multiplexing [1]–[3], but the use of
discrete frequency mixers is problematic due to their poor gain and noise
figure. Direct digitization of the RF with high speed ADCs has also been
explored [4], [5], but the lack of
frequency translation requires high sampling rates and power dissipation. Here
we propose the use of receivers based on passive N-path mixers implemented in
CMOS for on-coil frequency conversion.
Methods
N-path
receiver:
Our method is heavily based on work by Andrews and Molnar [6]–[8], which demonstrates
a mixer-first tunable receiver core based on N-path mixers and baseband low
noise amplifiers integrated on a single CMOS die (TSMC 65nm). We used the NCSU
Cadence design kit to design a similar receiver core (see Fig. 1) for operation
at FRF=64MHz. The design was fabricated with the MOSIS educational
program (ON Semiconductor C5N 0.5μm process). The receiver is fed with a 252MHz
reference LO, which is split into eight non-overlapping pulses at 63MHz that
drive the switches of an eight-path passive mixer. The result is eight intermediate
frequency signals at FIF=1MHz with interleaved phase, which feed
four differential IF LNAs. The gain of the LNAs and the dead time of the LO
pulses were adjustable with a serial peripheral interface (SPI). The mixer
sampling capacitors are also implemented on-chip. The gain, single sideband noise
figure, IP1dB, and power consumption of the mixer are simulated and measured
experimentally. Dynamic range (DR) is calculated assuming a channel bandwidth
of 200kHz. Layout area and power consumption do not include the LO divider,
bypass capacitors, or bondpads.
Packaging
and external circuitry:
The IC itself is
1.5x1.5mm, but was packaged in a large DIP-40 carrier, as provided at no cost
from MOSIS. The packaged mixer is shown on a test PCB in Fig 2. External
amplifiers and filters were used to combine the eight IF outputs into a single IF
port [6] for noise figure measurements. The
reference LO was derived from an ADF4351 frequency synthesizer (Analog Devices).
65nm
design simulation:
A schematic-level
design of an N=16 receiver core was created with the UMC 65nm foundry design
kit. The smaller feature size and wider variety of devices in this process
allow large improvements in performance and density.
Results
Table I summarizes
the results of the simulations for both 0.5μm and 65nm designs, and the
experimental results for the 0.5µm design. The measurements were performed with
the LNAs configured for maximum and minimum gain. The external IF combination
circuitry had an overall gain of -2dB and an image rejection ratio of -30dB. The
NF
SSB was measured experimentally using the gain method [9], and was measured at the output of
the IF combination chain. In addition to the power required by the mixer core
(including the LNAs and mixer drivers), the 0.5μm design required 30mW for the
LO divider.
Discussion and
conclusions
In its present state, the 0.5μm mixer does not offer significant
advantages over on-coil RF LNAs due to its large package size, high power
consumption, and high NF. However, we demonstrate that these parameters can be
accurately predicted with simulation. By following a similar design methodology
with the 65nm process, we predict an improved NF
SSB near 0.5dB while requiring a
fraction of the power and area. Such a low NF makes the use of RF LNAs
unnecessary; a matched coil can be fed directly to the mixer input, allowing
for the mixer’s wideband and tunable properties to be exploited. Ultimately we
envision multiple N-path receiver cores implemented on a single chip, as shown
in Fig. 3. Each of the
M coil
channels feeds a mixer core, all of which share a common LO bus. The
N interleaved IF ports of each receiver
core would be reduced to quadrature outputs, which are sampled by matched integrated
ADCs. The
M results are digitally
downconverted (DDC) then combined and serialized over a single digital link.
This would allow for on-coil digitization with relatively low power compared to
direct sampling of the RF with a single ADC.
M channels could be supported with a single cable carrying DC power
and the reference LO, while a fiber optic or wireless link could transmit the
digital output back to the scanner.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported
by Siemens healthcare. We also thank the MOSIS MEP and the NCSU CDK
project.References
[1] W. He, X. Qin, R. Jiejing, and L.
Gengying, “Four-channel magnetic resonance imaging receiver using frequency
domain multiplexing,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 78, no. 1,
p. 015102, 2007.
[2] M.
J. Riffe, M. D. Twieg, N. Gudino, C. J. Blumenthal, J. A. Heilman, and M. A.
Griswold, “Identification and mitigation of interference sources present in
SSB-based wireless MRI receiver arrays: Interference Sources in SSB-Based MRI
Receiver Arrays,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 70, no. 6, pp.
1775–1786, Dec. 2013.
[3] R.
H. Buchwald, “MR receiver assembly having readout cables capable of multiple
channel transmissions,” US7449886 B2, 11-Nov-2008.
[4] F.
V. Liere, “MRI system with direct digital receiver using resampling,” US8049505
B2, 01-Nov-2011. [5] J.
Reber, D. O. Brunner, T. Schmid, U. Moser, B. E. Dietrich, C. Barmet, and K. P.
Pruessmann, “In-Bore Broadband Array Receivers
with Optical Transmission,” presented at the ISMRM, Milan, IT, 2014.
[6] C.
Andrews and A. C. Molnar, “A Passive Mixer-First Receiver With Digitally
Controlled and Widely Tunable RF Interface,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State
Circuits, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 2696–2708, Dec. 2010. [7] C.
Andrews and A. C. Molnar, “Implications of Passive Mixer Transparency for
Impedance Matching and Noise Figure in Passive Mixer-First Receivers,” IEEE
Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 57, no. 12,
pp. 3092–3103, Dec. 2010.
[8] A.
Molnar and C. Andrews, “Impedance, filtering and noise in n-phase passive CMOS
mixers,” 2012, pp. 1–8.
[9] “Three
Methods of Noise Figure Measurement,” Maxim Integrated. [Online].
Available: https://www.maximintegrated.com/en/app-notes/index.mvp/id/2875.
[Accessed: 22-Oct-2015].