Cheng Chen1, Mason Greer1, Michael Twieg1, Mark A. Griswold1,2, and Soumyajit Mandal1
1Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States, 2Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, United States
Synopsis
Ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) are two well-established imaging
modalities with largely complementary contrast mechanisms. We propose and
experimentally evaluate the feasibility of a fundamentally new tool; miniaturized
two-dimensional (2-D) US collocated with a one-dimensional (1-D) single-sided MR
system for bimodal imaging in portable or wearable form factors. The proposed
system will be capable of scheduling both measurements in real-time, thus
enabling closed-loop operation in which the output of one sensor is used to
optimize the operation of the other. We study
the feasibility of such a system and show preliminary experimental results
obtained by combining a commercial US imaging system with a custom single-sided
planar MR sensor.Purpose
Multimodal imaging is of great interest due to the possibility of
combining different sources of contrast
1. In particular, US and MR imaging are often
manually combined in normal clinical practice to take advantage of their complementary
contrast mechanisms. A combination of US
and MR imaging may help to increase the true detection rate of cancer
2,
cardiovascular disease (which accounts for 32% of all U.S. deaths
3),
and other conditions. However, we are unaware of any low-cost point-of-care or wearable system that
integrates both imaging modalities. We propose a fundamentally new design; a miniaturized 2-D US sensor
collocated with a 1-D, low-field MR sensor for bimodal imaging in portable or
wearable form factors. The end goal is to develop a system in which
the US and MR sensors, electronics, and signal processing unit are contained within one instrument. This paper describes work done to
experimentally verify the feasibility of such an integrated US and MR imaging
system.
Methods
MR sensor: The
single-sided low-field MR sensor used in this work has been previously
described4. It uses an array of 3 low-cost permanent magnets and has
a usable depth range of 4-12mm. External RF interference is reduced by using a
butterfly-shaped planar RF coil (gradiometer). The typical Larmor frequency and
vertical resolution at a depth of 7 mm are 8.26MHz and Δy≈94µm,
respectively. Figure 1 shows a block diagram of the sensor. A benchtop NMR spectrometer (Kea2, Magritek)
is used to generate the pulse sequence and collect data. Two-dimensional relaxation-relaxation and
diffusion-relaxation maps (T1-T2 and D-T2) were
measured at various depths within the skin of an adult volunteer using the
setup shown in Figure 2(a). The sensor was also used to measure the velocity of
a sample (doped water) flowing through Teflon tubing.
US-MR integration: We used the single-sided MR sensor and a commercial US sensor to collect
data from the same phantom. Four PEEK cylinders
(OD=1.7mm) are arranged inside a glass tube (ID=4.1mm) filled with PBS.
This phantom is placed inside a silicone rubber mold to simulate human tissue.
The phantom arrangement is shown in Figures 3(a) and 3(b). B-mode 2-D US images (xz-plane) were measured
by a commercial medical-grade US imaging system (Risingmed RUS-9000B) using a
linear transducer array (6-8.5MHz). 1D MR images (y-axis) of the same sample
were obtained by using a computer-controlled motion stage to move the sample along the y-axis.
The experimental setup described above can be seen in Figure 2(a).
Results
MR experiments: Figure 2(b) shows measured results from human skin. The D-T2
maps show that bound water decreases with skin depth while unbound or free
water increases. Figure 2(c) shows the
results of the velocity experiment. The extra relaxation caused by sample
motion increases linearly with flow rate, so the mean velocity of samples
with known T2 can be estimated without a pulsed field gradient
system.
US-MR experiment: Figure 4 shows results from the combined
US-MR experiment. The bottom left
shows the US image, with the tube being the bright line running from top
to bottom. The graphs on the right show the MR results (initial signal
amplitude and T2 of the PBS). The US image clearly shows the
exterior of the glass tube but not its internal structure; the MR scan measures properties of the liquid (PBS) and resolves fine structural details within the tube,
including periodic reductions in signal amplitude (but not T2) caused
by the PEEK cylinders. This result shows the effectiveness of low-field MR in
imaging objects that are inside acoustic shadow regions and thus invisible to
US.
Discussion and conclusion
Our experimental results demonstrate the feasibility of portable or wearable integrated US-MR imaging. The combined data
shows that US has larger penetration depth, while MR has greater depth
resolution and can image within acoustic shadow regions. We are currently
developing a custom linear US transducer array that is physically thin enough
(thickness <4 mm) to be mounted underneath the magnet. We are also
developing a set of planar coils to apply pulsed field gradients along the
x and
z directions, which will allow three-dimensional (3-D) imaging with
the single-sided MR sensor
5. The end goal
is to create integrated US-MR probes for autonomous diagnosis of tumors and
cardiovascular disease by developing visualization tools to fuse 2-D US and 3-D
MR data, and also machine learning algorithms to classify the fused images. Figure 5 shows a conceptual design for such
an integrated probe. The results of this
paper show that such a system has the potential to be a valuable tool for
studying the properties of tissue.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Sauter,
A. W. et al., “Combined PET/MRI: One step further
in multimodality imaging,” Trends Mol. Med. 16, 508–515 (2010).
2. J. Rennert et al,
“Image fusion of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with computed tomography
(CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using volume navigation for detection,
characterization and planning of therapeutic interventions of liver tumors,” in
Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, 2011, vol. 49, no. 1–4, pp.
67–81.
3. D.
Mozaffarian, et al., “Heart Disease and Stroke
Statistics--2015 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association,”
Circulation, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. e29–e322, Jan. 2015.
4. Twieg,
Michael. “Open source NMR relaxometry platform” M.S. Thesis. Case Western
Reserve University, 2013.
5. J. Perlo et al., "3D imaging with a
single-sided sensor: An open tomograph," J. Magn. Reson., vol. 166, pp. 228–235, 2004.