Sung-Ho Lee1, Hsin-Yu Lai1, Yu-Chieh Jill Kai1, You-Yin Chen2, and Yen-Yu Ian Shih1
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States, 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of National Yang Ming, Taipei, Taiwan
Synopsis
In this study, we aim to provide in vivo evidence of using this novel electrode array for selective
deep brain stimulation (DBS) in rats with simultaneous fMRI readouts. This
novel development opens up a new avenue to explore and validate functional
connectivity in the brain with a resolution and specificity that cannot be
achieved by traditional fMRI or fcMRI approach.Synopsis
In this study, we aim to provide in vivo evidence of using a novel electrode array for high-resolution
deep brain stimulation (DBS) in rats with simultaneous fMRI readouts. This
novel development opens up a new avenue to explore and validate functional
connectivity in the brain with a resolution and specificity that cannot be
achieved by traditional fMRI or fcMRI approach.
Purpose
Functional connectivity MRI
(fcMRI) or resting-state fMRI has become one of the leading tools to map neural
circuit connectivity and has been playing a pivotal role in several large-scale
brain mapping projects worldwide. Despite ongoing technical advancements in MR
data acquisition and analysis, we still face tremendous challenges to
unequivocally interpret fcMRI data. This prompt us to develop a novel means
that allows mapping brain connectivity by directly stimulating a specific brain
nucleus at unprecedented spatial resolution. Our group has demonstrated success in
using an advanced micromachining approach to fabricate miniature 16-channel electrode
arrays
1 In contrast to many platinum-iridium, glass, and
silicon-based electrodes, our microelectrode uses a flexible, highly
biocompatible, and MR-compatible base substrate – polyimide, which is known to
better match the mechanical impedance of the brain than the other materials
commonly used. In this study, we perform fMRI at 9.4T to
examine the performance of this electrode array for direct mapping of
functional connectivity through localized brain stimulation at the ventral
posterior thalamic complex (VP) – a small brain region that has very well-known
somatotopic organization.
Methods
In vivo
DBS-fMRI experiments were conducted in a group of five Sprague Dawley rats weighing
250-300 g. A 16-channel MR-compatible microelectrode array was stereotactically
implanted for into the VP. Rats were first be orotracheally intubated and
ventilated under deep isoflurane anesthesia (2-2.5%) for electrode implantation
into the VP. During fMRI experiments, the rats were anesthetized by using 1%
isoflurane with pancuronium bromide (1 mg/kg/hr). A 72 mm quadrature volume
coil was used as the RF transmitter and a 4-channel phase array coil was used
as a receiver. fMRI data was acquired with two-shot gradient echo EPI with
bandwidth=100kHz, TR/TE=750/14 ms, NR=4, FOV=2.56x2.56 cm
2, matrix size=128x128,
slice number=8 and slice thickness=1mm. Physiological parameters was monitored
and recorded using MR-compatible physiological monitoring systems and
maintained within normal ranges, similar to those described in our previous
publications
2-5. To validate the efficacy of our microelectrode
array for selective current injection, bipolar DBS was performed between two
adjacent channel in the serial order of 8 combinations (e.g., 1-2, 2-3, …
15-16) in a pseudo-random manner. For each fMRI trial, the stimulation paradigm
was 60 s initial rest, 30 s stimulation, followed by 120 s rest. DBS frequency
of 20 Hz square-wave, current of 1 mA, and pulse width of 50 µs was used. Three
repeated trials were performed for each combination in order to improve
functional contrast-to-noise-ratio and measurement precision. All data preprocessing pipeline and analysis followed our published protocols
2,3.
Results and discussions
The 16-channel
electrode and experimental
setup for high resolution DBS of the VP are shown in Fig 1a-b. In most cases, the lowest contact lead was located in the
ventroposterior lateral nucleus (VPL) and the highest contact lead was in the
ventroposterior medial nucleus (VPM) (Fig
1c). The locations of the electrode were subsequently mapped by using high-resolution spin-echo images and the specific stimulus locations were
assigned into three sub-divisions, namely, dorsal, medial and ventral part of
VP (Fig 1c-d). Electrical
stimulation of VP showed distinct response patterns and well predicted by the
respective stimulation sites (Fig 1e).
To further elucidate the evoked time-course responses to DBS at different VP
subdivisions, we chose three somatosensory areas including barrel (S1BF), jaw/upper
lip (S1J-ULp) and forelimb/hindlimb (S1FL/HL)6 as regions of
interest (Fig 1f). In order to
further dissect the respective projections from each VP subdivisions to the
cortex, we also employed data-driven statistical approaches to create maps representing
differences among DBS locations (Fig 2).
This microelectrode array provides
a unique solution for implant accuracy, as any pair of electrode channels (flexible
from 75 to 1125 µm spacing at various locations, a total of 120 different
combinations for 16 channels) within the entire electrode span can be selected
for DBS, enabling fine-tuning of stimulation delivery with a single surgical
implantation. This
novel development opens up a new avenue to explore and validate functional
connectivity in the brain with a resolution and specificity that cannot be
achieved by traditional fMRI or fcMRI approach.
Acknowledgements
We thank Jon Frank and Joseph Merill of the UNC
Biomedical Research Imaging Center (BRIC) Small Animal Imaging (SAI) facility
for technical assistance. We also thank members of the Shih laboratory for
valuable discussions concerning the experiments described in this manuscript. This
research was supported by the NINDS(NS091236), the National Institute of Mental
Health (MH106939), the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
(AA020023), the National Institute of Health UL1TR001111 sub-awards 550KR81420
and 550KR91413, the Brain and Behavior Foundation Young Investigator Award and
Ellen Schapiro & Gerald Axelbaum Investigator fund, the American Heart
Association Scientist Development Award (15SDG23260025), and the Department of
Neurology and the Biomedical Research Imaging Center at UNC Chapel Hill.References
[1] Yang et al., PLoS ONE 2013, 8(6):e66821. [2] Shih et al., J Neurosci 2009, 29:3036. [3]
Shih et al., J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2014, 34: 1483. [4] Kao et al., Neurobiol
Dis 2014, 71:131 [5] Lai HY 2015, 73(3):1246. [6] Zembrzycki et al., Nature
Neurosci 2013, 16(8):1060