Xiaowei Zhuang1, Zhengshi Yang1, Tim Curran2, and Dietmar Cordes1,2
1Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, United States, 2Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States
Synopsis
In
this abstract, the input/output transfer relationship in human hippocampal
subfields (mainly CA1, CA3, and DG) was studied using fMRI during a spatial
memory task with increments in the change of FOV in the stimuli. Whole brain
activation was obtained for all lure v/s control contrasts. Mean activation t
value for each hippocampal subregions (CA1, CA2&3 and CA4&DG) was
extracted, averaged over all the subjects and plotted against FOV changes to
compare with the existing models. K-means clustering was then applied. Data
from one of the k-means clusters showed a pattern separation/completion curve
similar to the animal model.Purpose
The critical role of the hippocampus
and nearby Medial Temporal Lobe (MTL) cortex in learning and memory is well
documented
1, 2, but the precise nature of the function of
hippocampal subfields and the adjacent MTL cortical subregions remains unclear.
Animal models have indicated an input/output transfer function for neural
activity in hippocampal subfields
3, which indicates neurons in the
Cornu Ammonis area 1 (CA1) region respond linearly to the change of input,
whereas neurons in Dentate Gyrus (DG) are more sensitive and respond
non-linearly to small increment in the variation of input
4, 5. An
fMRI study has been conducted to further investigate this input/output transfer
relationship in human hippocampal subfields (mainly CA1, CA3 and DG) during a
spatial memory task.
Methods
Imaging: fMRI was performed
on 24 healthy subjects on a 3.0 T Siemens Trio scanner (32-channel head coil,
multiband accelerate factor = 8, TR = 765ms, TE = 30 ms, flip angle = 44deg, FOV =
19.1 x 14.2 cm, 80 slices in oblique coronal orientation perpendicular to long
axis of hippocampus, resolution = 1.65mm x 1.65mm x 2mm, BW = 1724 Hz/pixel, echo
spacing = 0.72 ms and 2380 time frames). A repetition suppression spatial
memory task was performed to examine differences in pattern separation and
completion tendencies of hippocampal subfields, involving viewing of pairs of
visual objects presented for a first time, repetitions of the same objects, or
lures that were visually similar to the first-time objects. Three type of lures
were presented, which differed from the original objects by a separation
distance of 10% Field of View (FOV), 20% FOV, 30% FOV. A control task (pixelated
background of the math task) occurred occasionally requiring subjects to
perform simple addition.
Analysis: All
data were slice timing corrected, realigned to the co-planar SE-EPI image,
distortion corrected using two SE-EPI acquisitions with reverse gradient
polarity and smoothed with a 4mm Gaussian kernel. Time series were detrended
after first 15 frames were eliminated and mass-univariate analysis was then
applied to all 24 subjects. Whole brain t-statistics activation map for
contrast Lure v/s Control were acquired and coregistered to the subject
anatomical space. A standard MPRAGE T1 structural image was input into
Freesurfer segmentation
6 to get hippocampal subfields. Average
t-statistics for new v/s control, repeat v/s control and lure v/s control with
different FOV changes in CA1, CA3 and DG were plotted and extracted as a
feature vector for each subject. K-means clustering was performed on the entire
feature set for all 24 subjects. Average t-statistics for each cluster were
plotted against the change of FOVs for different subregions to analyze the
input/output transfer function in that subfield.
Results
Bilateral activations
(p< 0.001, uncorrected (see Fig 1, whole brain activation map for lure with
20% change of FOV)) in hippocampus were observed for all contrast (lures v/s
control). Mean t-value for all subregions, averaging over 24 subjects,
indicates a higher activation in CA2&3 and CA4&DG regions than CA1 area
(Fig 2A). Further, data from one of the k-means clusters (Fig 2B) showed patterns
similar to the prediction model
7.
Discussion
A pattern
separation/completion curve similar to the animal model
3, 7 is
obtained in CA1 and DG regions with data from one of the k-means clusters.
Activation in CA1 region shows a monotonic increase with the incremental change
in FOV whereas in DG region, smaller increments in change in FOV result in
faster activations and finally converge with CA1 region.
Conclusion
Our spatial memory
fMRI design shows bilateral activations in major hippocampal regions with
higher activations being observed in CA234&DG areas as compared to CA1
region. In addition, as the change of FOV increases, activations in all areas
show an overall rising pattern and one cluster output from k-means indicates
activity similar to pattern separation in the animal model. Future applications
of our experimental design and method can be applied to monitor treatment
effects on human memory disorders.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the NIH (grant number 7R01EB014284).References
1. Fortin NJ et al.,
2002, Nature Neuroscience. 2. Wallenstein GV et al., 1998, Trends in
Neurosciences. 3. Stark CEL et al., 2011, Trends in Neurosciences. 4. Bakker A
et al., 2008, Science. 5. Guzowski JF et al., 2004, Neuron. 6. Van Leemput K et al., 2009, Hippocampus.
7. Lacy JW et al., 2011, Learn Mem.