Adam Rich1, Lee C. Potter1, Ning Jin2, Juliana Serafim da Silveira3, Orlando P. Simonetti3, and Rizwan Ahmad3
1Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States, 2Siemens Medical Solutions, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States, 3Dorthy M. Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
Synopsis
Phase-contrast magnetic resonance is a powerful tool for study of cardiac flow, but clinical application is limited to planar imaging of one velocity component. This abstract demonstrates three-directional flow imaging using a single breath-hold acquisition. Imaging is accomplished by jointly processing all encodings and frames; Bayesian reconstruction leverages image structure via both wavelet compression and statistical relations among velocity encoded images. Digital phantom results show accurate estimation of stroke volume and peak velocity, with significant reductions in bias and variance, as well as over 30% increase in Pearson correlation coefficient, compared to L1-SENSE. In vivo results demonstrate repeatable flow estimation.Purpose
Characterization
of hemodynamics in the heart and great vessels is useful for quantification of
cardiac function and evaluation of pathologies, such as valvular and congenital
heart disease. Phase-contrast MRI
(PC-MRI) provides volumetric, time resolved images of the hemodynamics within
the heart and great vessels in a safe and noninvasive manner; however, clinical
application of PC-MRI, when extended to multiple flow directions or volumetric coverage,
is limited by long acquisition times
1.
Theory
An empirical Bayes reconstruction technique is presented,
extending through-plane velocity imaging presented previously
2. The
data from all encodings and across all frames are jointly processed to recover a
minimum mean squared error estimate of the three-directional velocity map. A
mixture prior exploits the correlation across encodings: voxel values are
similar across encodings in regions of zero velocity, whereas voxel values
differ in phase at voxels with velocity. The Bayes processing provides
automated scoring of probability of velocity, via a hidden indicator random
variable, to apply this regularizing constraint. We model this velocity
indicator variable as a Markov chain. Additional regularization is provided by a
sparse prior on non-decimated spatio-temporal wavelet coefficients. VISTA
sampling
4 provides informative k-space samples that are incoherent across space,
time, and encodings. Wavelet sub-band weights and Markov chain parameters are
self-tuning via expectation-maximization
2,5,6. Belief propagation,
accelerated by generalized approximate message passing
3 yields fast
computation (see Fig 1.).
Methods
Data were processed for a digital
phantom and five healthy volunteers using ReVEAL; for comparison, the phantom data were
also reconstructed using L1 SENSE that processed data from each encoding
individually.
Simulation
study: A
dynamic 120x120 planar digital phantom with 48 temporal frames was simulated
using Matlab. Circular receiver coils were simulated using the Biot-Savart law and
estimated from the undersampled data. Three-directional flow in a small circular “vessel”
was simulated by replicating the image four times and
modulating the phase of three of these images, within the vessel, with three
distinct time-velocity profiles. All four images contained a slowly, time-varying background phase. Data were simulated using referenced four point
encoding and R=12 VISTA sampling. The k-space data were corrupted with
complex-valued Gaussian noise. Five velocity time profiles, 12 or 16 coil
acquisition, and two phantom configurations were used to create n=20 samples.
In
vivo study: Planar
images with three velocity encoded directions were similarly reconstructed in
five healthy volunteers. Data were
acquired using a Siemens Avanto 1.5T scanner with an 18 channel cardiac array
and a prospective ECG triggered sequence using referenced 4 point
encoding. Scan parameters were TE=2.7ms,
TR=4.7ms, two lines per segment for a temporal resolution of 38ms, flip angle
15o, FOV 320x320mm2, matrix size 160x158. The imaging plane was placed above the aortic
valve, and each acquisition was repeated 6 times per volunteer. The data were prospectively accelerated by R=8 using VISTA
sampling patterns and acquired in 10 heartbeats during
a single breath-hold. A 40 ms prescan
provided an estimate of measurement noise power used in ReVEAL.
Results
Stroke
volume (SV) and peak velocity (PV) estimation errors are reported in Fig. 2 for
the n=20 phantom trials. The table displays bias, standard deviation, and
Pearson’s coefficient for the estimated flow parameters; also shown are
normalized mean squared error on complex-valued images and the SSIM
7
similarity metric computed on the
magnitude and phase images. For both SV
and PV, the ReVEAL reconstruction shows significant reduction in both bias and
standard deviation, compared to L1-SENSE. Peak velocity correlation coefficient
improves from 0.65 to 0.92. In vivo results in Fig. 3 explore repeatability of
flow measurements from in vivo ReVEAL reconstructions across six acquisitions per
healthy volunteer. Flow parameters were
computed in the ascending aorta on a region of interest hand selected, frame by
frame, by a board-certified cardiologist.
Discussion and Conclusions
L1 SENSE and ReVEAL utilize the same squared-error
data fidelity penalty and spatio-temporal regularization using wavelets, and
each method requires a single hand tuned regularization parameter. Both L1 SENSE and ReVEAL are enhanced by the
use of optimized VISTA sampling patterns. However, ReVEAL jointly processes the data
across the four encoded images to exploit correlations between them. The
results shown here are for planar images.
The extension to volumetric images, and thus 4D flow, is straightforward.
We expect to achieve even higher acceleration rates for 4D flow imaging—potentially
enabling 4D flow in a single breath-hold—due to increased spatial correlation
and improved SNR in volumetric images.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by a research grant from Siemens.References
1. Markl et al. Comprehensive 4D
velocity mapping of the heart and great vessels by cardiovascular magnetic
resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011;13(7):1-22.
2. Rich et al., A Bayesian model for
highly accelerated phase-contrast MRI, Magn Reson Med.
doi:
10.1002/mrm.25904
3. Vila J. and Schniter P.
Expectation-maximization Gaussian-mixture approximate message passing. IEEE
Trans Signal Process. 2013;61(19):4658-4672.
4. Ahmad R. et al. Variable density
incoherent spatiotemporal acquisition (VISTA) for highly accelerated cardiac
MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2015;74(5):1266-1278.
5. Ahmad R. and Schniter P. Iteratively
reweighted L1 approaches to sparse composite regularization. IEEE Trans Comp
Imag. doi:10.1109/TCI.2015.2485078.
6. Ziniel J, Schniter P. Dynamic
compressive sensing of time-varying signals via approximate message
passing,
IEEE Trans Signal Process 2013;61:5270-5284.
7. Zhou W, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, and
Simoncelli, EP. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural
similarity, IEEE Trans on Image Process 2004;13(4):600-612.