Joint Processing of Highly Accelerated Multi-Directional PC-MRI Data Using ReVEAL
Adam Rich1, Lee C. Potter1, Ning Jin2, Juliana Serafim da Silveira3, Orlando P. Simonetti3, and Rizwan Ahmad3

1Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States, 2Siemens Medical Solutions, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States, 3Dorthy M. Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States

Synopsis

Phase-contrast magnetic resonance is a powerful tool for study of cardiac flow, but clinical application is limited to planar imaging of one velocity component. This abstract demonstrates three-directional flow imaging using a single breath-hold acquisition. Imaging is accomplished by jointly processing all encodings and frames; Bayesian reconstruction leverages image structure via both wavelet compression and statistical relations among velocity encoded images. Digital phantom results show accurate estimation of stroke volume and peak velocity, with significant reductions in bias and variance, as well as over 30% increase in Pearson correlation coefficient, compared to L1-SENSE. In vivo results demonstrate repeatable flow estimation.

Purpose

Characterization of hemodynamics in the heart and great vessels is useful for quantification of cardiac function and evaluation of pathologies, such as valvular and congenital heart disease. Phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) provides volumetric, time resolved images of the hemodynamics within the heart and great vessels in a safe and noninvasive manner; however, clinical application of PC-MRI, when extended to multiple flow directions or volumetric coverage, is limited by long acquisition times1.

Theory

An empirical Bayes reconstruction technique is presented, extending through-plane velocity imaging presented previously2. The data from all encodings and across all frames are jointly processed to recover a minimum mean squared error estimate of the three-directional velocity map. A mixture prior exploits the correlation across encodings: voxel values are similar across encodings in regions of zero velocity, whereas voxel values differ in phase at voxels with velocity. The Bayes processing provides automated scoring of probability of velocity, via a hidden indicator random variable, to apply this regularizing constraint. We model this velocity indicator variable as a Markov chain. Additional regularization is provided by a sparse prior on non-decimated spatio-temporal wavelet coefficients. VISTA sampling4 provides informative k-space samples that are incoherent across space, time, and encodings. Wavelet sub-band weights and Markov chain parameters are self-tuning via expectation-maximization2,5,6. Belief propagation, accelerated by generalized approximate message passing3 yields fast computation (see Fig 1.).

Methods

Data were processed for a digital phantom and five healthy volunteers using ReVEAL; for comparison, the phantom data were also reconstructed using L1 SENSE that processed data from each encoding individually.

Simulation study: A dynamic 120x120 planar digital phantom with 48 temporal frames was simulated using Matlab. Circular receiver coils were simulated using the Biot-Savart law and estimated from the undersampled data. Three-directional flow in a small circular “vessel” was simulated by replicating the image four times and modulating the phase of three of these images, within the vessel, with three distinct time-velocity profiles. All four images contained a slowly, time-varying background phase. Data were simulated using referenced four point encoding and R=12 VISTA sampling. The k-space data were corrupted with complex-valued Gaussian noise. Five velocity time profiles, 12 or 16 coil acquisition, and two phantom configurations were used to create n=20 samples.

In vivo study: Planar images with three velocity encoded directions were similarly reconstructed in five healthy volunteers. Data were acquired using a Siemens Avanto 1.5T scanner with an 18 channel cardiac array and a prospective ECG triggered sequence using referenced 4 point encoding. Scan parameters were TE=2.7ms, TR=4.7ms, two lines per segment for a temporal resolution of 38ms, flip angle 15o, FOV 320x320mm2, matrix size 160x158. The imaging plane was placed above the aortic valve, and each acquisition was repeated 6 times per volunteer. The data were prospectively accelerated by R=8 using VISTA sampling patterns and acquired in 10 heartbeats during a single breath-hold. A 40 ms prescan provided an estimate of measurement noise power used in ReVEAL.

Results

Stroke volume (SV) and peak velocity (PV) estimation errors are reported in Fig. 2 for the n=20 phantom trials. The table displays bias, standard deviation, and Pearson’s coefficient for the estimated flow parameters; also shown are normalized mean squared error on complex-valued images and the SSIM7 similarity metric computed on the magnitude and phase images. For both SV and PV, the ReVEAL reconstruction shows significant reduction in both bias and standard deviation, compared to L1-SENSE. Peak velocity correlation coefficient improves from 0.65 to 0.92. In vivo results in Fig. 3 explore repeatability of flow measurements from in vivo ReVEAL reconstructions across six acquisitions per healthy volunteer. Flow parameters were computed in the ascending aorta on a region of interest hand selected, frame by frame, by a board-certified cardiologist.

Discussion and Conclusions

L1 SENSE and ReVEAL utilize the same squared-error data fidelity penalty and spatio-temporal regularization using wavelets, and each method requires a single hand tuned regularization parameter. Both L1 SENSE and ReVEAL are enhanced by the use of optimized VISTA sampling patterns. However, ReVEAL jointly processes the data across the four encoded images to exploit correlations between them. The results shown here are for planar images. The extension to volumetric images, and thus 4D flow, is straightforward. We expect to achieve even higher acceleration rates for 4D flow imaging—potentially enabling 4D flow in a single breath-hold—due to increased spatial correlation and improved SNR in volumetric images.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by a research grant from Siemens.

References

1. Markl et al. Comprehensive 4D velocity mapping of the heart and great vessels by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011;13(7):1-22.

2. Rich et al., A Bayesian model for highly accelerated phase-contrast MRI, Magn Reson Med. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25904

3. Vila J. and Schniter P. Expectation-maximization Gaussian-mixture approximate message passing. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2013;61(19):4658-4672.

4. Ahmad R. et al. Variable density incoherent spatiotemporal acquisition (VISTA) for highly accelerated cardiac MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2015;74(5):1266-1278.

5. Ahmad R. and Schniter P. Iteratively reweighted L1 approaches to sparse composite regularization. IEEE Trans Comp Imag. doi:10.1109/TCI.2015.2485078.

6. Ziniel J, Schniter P. Dynamic compressive sensing of time-varying signals via approximate message passing, IEEE Trans Signal Process 2013;61:5270-5284.

7. Zhou W, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, and Simoncelli, EP. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity, IEEE Trans on Image Process 2004;13(4):600-612.

Figures

Figure 1. A factor graph provides a visualization of the Bayesian modeling used for regularized inversion. The reconstruction algorithm is constructed via message passing on the graph, and results in an iterative thresholding procedure.

Figure 2. Digital phantom experiments comparing L1 SENSE to ReVEAL. Here μd is the mean difference between the ground truth value and reconstructed value, σd is the standard deviation of the difference, and r is the Pearson correlation coefficient. Normalized mean squared error (NMSE) in dB, magnitude SSIM, and velocity SSIM are also compared.

Figure 3. Tabulated results of the in vivo reproducibility experiment for peak velocity (PV) and stroke volume (SV). The minimum, maximum, and mean value of the 6 repetitions are given. Also, standard deviation (Std Dev.) and interquartile range (IQR) are shown.

Figure 4. Example PC-MRI images from a healthy volunteer reconstructed using ReVEAL from R=8 accelerated data. From the top left moving clockwise, the normalized magnitude image, z (through-plane) velocity map, x (in-plane) velocity map, y (in-plane) velocity map. Velocity maps are given in units of cm/s.

Figure 5. An example VISTA sampling pattern optimized over one phase encoding dimension, one time dimension, and four velocity encoded images.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0462