Yuexi Huang1, Ryan Alkins2, Martin Chapman3, James Perry4, Arjun Sahgal5, Maureen Trudeau6, Todd Mainprize7, and Kullervo Hynynen1,2
1Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Department of Anaesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Division of Neurology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, 7Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
Synopsis
In the first case of a pilot
clinical study to establish the feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy of
focused ultrasound to temporarily open blood brain barrier (BBB) to deliver
chemotherapy to brain tumors, BBB was successfully opened at two targeted
volumes close to the peripheral margin of the tumor, approximately 4cm lateral
from the midline of the brain. This may provide a new way to deliver
therapeutic agents into brain for the treatment of tumors and other brain
diseases.Introduction
Magnetic
resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) has been shown to reversibly open
the blood-brain barrier (BBB) for targeted drug delivery (1). Research on
animal models, including non-human primates (2), has been conducted to
investigate the effectiveness and characteristics of BBB openings. Here we
describe our initial experience in a pilot clinical study to establish the
feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy of focused ultrasound to
temporarily open the BBB to deliver chemotherapy to brain tumors.
Methods
This phase-one
clinical trial of BBB opening by focused ultrasound was approved by Health
Canada. A modified clinical MRgFUS brain system (ExAblate 4000, 230 kHz,
Insightec, Tirat Carmel, Israel) was used with a 3T MR scanner (Signa MR750, GE
Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA). Two hours before the procedure, liposomal
doxorubicin Caelyx (Janssen, Toronto, Canada) was intravenously infused over 1
hour at a dose of 30 mg/m2. The patient's head was then shaved and
positioned in the FUS array with a stereotactic frame. Two targets close to the
posterior margin of the glial tumor were chosen based on T2 images (Fig.1).
Each target consisted of a 3x3 grid of 9 spots at 3 mm spacing. For each spot,
2.6 ms on, 30.4 ms off FUS pulses were repeated for 300ms before steering to
the next spot. The pattern was repeated periodically resulting in an overall
pulse repetition frequency (PRF) for each spot of 0.9%. A bolus injection of 4
ul/kg of Definity microbubbles (Lantheus Medical
Imaging, N. Billerica, MA, USA) was applied simultaneously with each sonication
(1/5th of the clinical dose for ultrasound imaging). With the first
injection of microbubbles, 10s short sonications at 5W, 7W and 9W acoustic
power were applied to find the appropriate power level based on feedback of
cavitation signals. Cavitation signals
were detected by two receivers and sampled at a rate of 2 MHz. Spectrum
integration from 75 kHz to 155 kHz was calculated and two threshold levels of
the spectrum integration were defined as a safety mechanism based on
pre-clinical studies on a trans-human skull pig model (3). 9W was found to be
adequate for these targets. 50 s sonications at 9W were then applied at each
target, with a separate bolus injection of microbubbles for each. Post
sonication, Gd (Gadovist, Bayer)-enhanced 3D FSPGR images were acquired to
verify the BBB openings, and T2*-weighted GRE images (TE=15ms) were collected to
detect potential hemorrhage. After the treatment, the patient was released from
the head frame and MR scans were repeated with an 8-channel head coil for
better quality images. The patient underwent routine tumor resection the next
day and tissue samples at the two BBB opening targets were collected for
quantification of chemotherapy drug concentration.
Results
BBB opening was
successfully achieved at both locations with clear Gd enhancement of the 3x3
grid patterns (Fig.2). Despite using the same power level, the actual acoustic
pressure at the 2nd target was lower than the first due to steering of the FUS
beam. Small dark signals within individual sonicated spots in the T2* image
(Fig.3) indicated low-level extravasation of red blood cells. The
quantification of drug concentration is pending further analysis.
Discussion
The 3mm
spacing of the 9 spots was intentionally designed to form a grid pattern of Gd
enhancement for easier confirmation in heterogeneous tumors for the initial
cases. We do not expect an
impact on other parameters if the spacing needs to be reduced for an more uniform drug distribution within
the BBB opening volume. The
level of extravastion of RBC was low and not a concern in the tumor
environment. Our animal experiments have shown that the cavitation signal can
be used during the sonications to control the power level for eliminating the
RBC exravasations (4). The current
system did not use this method during sonications.
The tumor in this patient
was in the right temporal lobe adjacent to the skull. The two targets were ~4
cm lateral from the midline of the brain, and the 2nd target was
also ~2.5 cm posterior. Thermal ablations by FUS at these off-centre locations
are technically challenging due to excessive skull heating. However, successful
BBB openings at these locations were demonstrated at low powers at 230 kHz. If
these results can be repeated in other patients without complications, then the
method may provide a new way to deliver therapeutic agents into brain for the
treatment of tumors and other brain diseases.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Focused
Ultrasound Foundation for funding this trial and InSightec for technical
supports of the ExAblate system. The development of
this method was funded by NIH grant no. EB003268.References
1.Hynynen K et al. Radiology 2001;220:640-6.
2.McDannold N et al.
Cancer Research 2012;72:3652-63.
3.Huang Y et al.
ISMRM 2015, abstract 37.
4.O’Reilly MA et al. Radiology 2012;263:96-106.