Pseudo Steady State Free Precession for MR-Fingerprinting
Jakob Assländer1, Steffen Glaser2, and Jürgen Hennig1

1Dept. of Radiology - Medical Physics, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, 2Dept. of Chemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany

Synopsis

This work discusses steady state issues in SSFP-based fingerprinting sequences. It is shown that variations of the flip angle destroy the steady state, causing instabilities with respect to intra-voxel dephasing. A pseudo steady state can be achieved by adapting TR and TE to a given flip angle pattern, restoring the typical SSFP behavior. Furthermore, an iterative reconstruction algorithm for fingerprinting data is proposed.

Purpose

This abstract discusses the signal behavior when varying the flip angle in a (balanced) steady state free precession sequences (SSFP) sequence, as done in MR-Fingerprinting (MRF) sequences$$$^\text{1}$$$. The flip angle variations prevent a steady state and introduce instabilities regarding magnetic field inhomogeneities and intra-voxel dephasing. We show how a pseudo steady state free precession (pSSFP) results in a more stable MRF reconstruction. Furthermore, we propose an iterative reconstruction algorithm for fingerprinting data.

Theory

Disregarding the balanced gradients, a traditional SSFP sequence consists of a train of equidistant RF-pulses with a constant flip angle and a phase increment of $$$\pi$$$ for consecutive pulses. This leads to a steady state in which the magnetization oscillates about the z-axis (Fig.1a,b) and the polar angle $$$\vartheta=\alpha/2$$$ (in spherical coordinates) is approximately half the flip angle. As a consequence, a spin echo$$$^\text{2}$$$ is formed at $$$TE=TR/2$$$. However, when varying $$$\vartheta$$$, the phase of the isochromats is changed (Fig.1c). In contrast, the Euclidean distance between the tips of the magnetization vectors $$$\delta$$$ is not changed when rotating the entire spin ensemble instantaneously$$$^\text{3}$$$. Therefore, we can compare $$$d\delta$$$ for two isochromats that are separated by an infinitesimal phase difference $$$d\omega$$$. Before and after the $$$i^{\text{th}}$$$ RF-pulse it is given by $$d\delta_{i}^+=d\omega\cdot (TR_i-TE_i)\cdot\sin\vartheta_i\\d\delta_{i+1}^-=d\omega\cdot TE_{i+1}\cdot\sin\vartheta_{i+1}\;.$$ The preservation of $$$d\delta$$$ by a hard pulses reveals $$TE_{i+1}=(TR_i-TE_i)\cdot\frac{\sin\vartheta_i}{\sin\vartheta_{i+1}}\;.$$ A similar bandwidth compared to SSFP is achieved with $$\max\left\{ TE_{i+1},\;\;TR_i-TE_i\right\}=TR_{\text{SSFP}}/2\;.$$ The geometrical variables are depicted in Fig.1. With these relations, flip angle dependent values for $$$TR$$$ and $$$TE$$$ can be calculated, which maintain the spin echo-like character of SSFP sequences when varying the flip angle.

Methods

Dictionaries were calculated with Bloch simulations in the hard pulse approximation for the original flip angle pattern$$$^\text{1}$$$ with a constant $$$TR=4~\text{ms}$$$ and for the pSSFP approach with $$$TR_{\text{SSFP}}=4~\text{ms}$$$. In the latter sequence, the sections with $$$\alpha=0^\circ$$$ were omitted since they contradict the idea of SSFP. MRF data of a single slice of a volunteer's brain were acquired with a $$$3~\text{T}$$$ PRISMA scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) employing a radial readout with a golden angle increment. The total acquisition time was $$$4~\text{s}$$$ for the MRF sequence and $$$3.3~\text{s}$$$ for the pSSFP-MRF sequence. The spatial resolution was $$$1\text{mm}\times1\text{mm}\times3\text{mm}$$$, the $$$FOV=256~\text{mm}\times256~\text{mm}$$$ and the bandwidth was $$$1500~\text{Hz/px}$$$. For reconstructing $$$T_1,T_2$$$ and $$$PD$$$ maps we propose to iteratively minimize the cost function $$\tilde{x}=\arg\min_{x~\in~\mathbb{C}^{N \times T}}\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\left|\left|\mathbf{E}_{t,:,:}\cdot{x_{:,t}}–S_{:,t}\right|\right|_2^2+\lambda_{\mathbf{P}}^2\sum_{n=0}^{N-1}\left|\left|x_{n,:}-\mathbf{P}_{\mathcal{A}}(x_{n,:})\right|\right|_2^2+\lambda_{\mathbf{W}}^2\sum_{n=0}^{N-1}\left|\left|\mathbf{W}(x_{n,:})\right|\right|^1\;.$$ The search variable $$$x$$$ contains the images with all $$$N$$$ voxels of all $$$T$$$ time-frames. The first summand is the data consistency term with the forward operator $$$\mathbf{E}$$$ which incorporates a non-uniform FFT and ESPIRiT$$$^\text{4}$$$ coil sensitivities. The second term compares the time series of each voxel with its projection $$$\mathbf{P}$$$ on the dictionary $$$\mathcal{A}$$$. The third term is an $$$\ell_1$$$-penalty in the wavelet domain$$$^\text{5}$$$. Since this algorithm approaches the Bloch response recovery via iterated projection algorithm$$$^\text{6}$$$ (BLIP) when setting the regularization parameters to $$$\lambda_{\mathbf{P}}\rightarrow\infty$$$ and $$$\lambda_{\mathbf{W}}\rightarrow0$$$, we refer to it as generalized BLIP (gBLIP). The quantitative $$$T_1,T_2$$$ and PD-maps finally result from $$$\mathbf{P}_{\mathcal{A}}(x)$$$ via a look-up table.

Results

The spin echo formations known from SSFP (Fig.2b) are lost when varying the flip angle (Fig.2c), but can be restored with the proposed approach (Fig.2d). Comparing the signal evolution of a single isochromat to the signal evolution averaged with a Cauchy distribution corresponding to a decay time of $$$T_2'=40~\text{ms}$$$, significant differences can be observed (Fig.3). The difference becomes obvious in the sections with $$$\alpha=0^\circ$$$, where the single isochromat decays with $$$T_2$$$, while the averaged signal decays with $$$T_2^*$$$. These differences introduce a dependency of the signal evolution and ultimately the quantitative maps to intra-voxel dephasing. This dependency can be undone by the pSSFP approach (Fig.4), as long as the signal contributions originate from the central passband. The maps in Fig.5 reveal the feasibility of acquiring quantitative maps with a matrix size of $$$256\times256$$$ with 1000 and 850 spokes in the case of MRF and pSSFP-MRF, respectively. In the case of MRF, $$$T_1=802\pm79~\text{ms}$$$ and $$$T_2=47.3\pm6.3~\text{ms}$$$ of white matter are reduced compared to literature ($$$T_1=1110\pm45~\text{ms}^\text{7}$$$ and $$$T_2=69\pm3~\text{ms}^\text{8}$$$). Employing the concept of pSSFP, $$$T_1=1052\pm42~\text{ms}$$$ matches literature well, while $$$T_2=96.8\pm6.2~\text{ms}$$$ is slightly overestimated. This behavior translates to other tissues.

Conclusion and Outlook

The proposed adjustments of TR and TE restore the spin-echo-like signal behavior typical for SSFP in fingerprinting sequences, making this approach more robust to intra-voxel dephasing. Along with the proposed gBLIP reconstruction, feasible $$$T_1$$$ and $$$PD$$$-maps can be acquired with a resolution of $$$1~\text{mm}$$$ within $$$3.3~\text{s}$$$. The $$$T_2$$$-information of the acquired data seems to be insufficient. Future work will address this issue by optimizing the flip angle pattern for best discrimination of different tissue employing optimal control.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dan Ma for providing the original MRF excitation pattern.

References

[1] Ma, D., Gulani, V., Seiberlich, N., Liu, K., Sunshine, J. L., Duerk, J. L., & Griswold, M. A. (2013). Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature, 495(7440), 187–192. doi:10.1038/nature11971

[2] Scheffler, K., & Hennig, J. (2003). Is TrueFISP a gradient-echo or a spin-echo sequence? Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 49(2), 395–397. doi:10.1002/mrm.10351

[3] Assländer, J., Glaser, S. J., & Hennig, J. (2015). Spin echoes in the regime of weak dephasing. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, (epub ahead of print). doi:10.1002/mrm.25579

[4] Uecker, M., Lai, P., Murphy, M. J., Virtue, P., Elad, M., Pauly, J. M., … Lustig, M. (2014). ESPIRiT - An eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: Where SENSE meets GRAPPA. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 71(3), 990–1001. doi:10.1002/mrm.24751

[5] Lustig, M., Donoho, D., & Pauly, J. M. (2007). Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 58(6), 1182–1195. doi:10.1002/mrm.21391

[6] Davies, M., Puy, G., Vandergheynst, P., & Wiaux, Y. (2014). A Compressed Sensing Framework for Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 7(4), 27. doi:10.1137/130947246

[7] Ethofer T, Mader I, Seeger U, Helms G, Erb M, Grodd W, Ludolph A, Klose U. Comparison of longitudinal metabolite relaxation times in different regions of the human brain at 1.5 and 3 T. Magn Res Med 2003;50:1296–1301.

[8] Stanisz, G. J., Odrobina, E. E., Pun, J., Escaravage, M., Graham, S. J., Bronskill, M. J., & Henkelman, R. M. (2005). T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T. Magn Reson Med, 54(3), 507–512. doi:10.1002/mrm.20605

Figures

Figure 1: In order to demonstrate the geometrical considerations, magnetization right before (a) and after (b,c) the (i+1)st RF-pulse are depicted. In the case of an SSFP sequence with a constant flip angle, the polar angle ϑ is constant and the absolute value of the phase distribution |Δφ| remains unchanged (a,b). However, if ϑ is reduced or increased by a varying flip angle - as done in MRF - the phase distribution of the magnetization is amplified (c) or attenuated, respectively.

Figure 2: The phase evolution of the magnetization is displayed for different pulse sequences along with their RF-pattern (a). In the case of the SSFP sequence (b), the magnetization is mirrored at the x-axis by each RF-pulse, which results in a spin-echo formation at TE = TR/2. When changing the flip angle, no steady state is established and no spin-echoes are formed (c). However, when adjusting TR in the proposed manner, the spin-echo formations are restored to some degree (d).

Figure 3: The original flip angle pattern of MRF is displayed in (a). In contrast to 1, constant TR = 4 ms and TE = TR/2 were used in order to isolate the effects of the varying flip angle (b). Assuming only a single isochromat with ω = 0, the resulting magnetization is shown in (c), while (d) shows the signal assuming a Cauchy distributed magnetization with T2' = 40 ms.

Figure 4: The original RF-pattern of MRF was slightly modified to meet the conditions of pSSFP (a). The TR and TE-pattern resulting from the proposed approach is shown in (b). The resulting signal is depicted in (c) and (d) assuming a single isochromat with ω = 0 and a Cauchy distribution with T2' = 40 ms, respectively.

Figure 5: The quantitative maps were acquired with the pattern displayed in Fig.3 and 4, respectively and reconstructed employing the proposed gBLIP algorithm. One can observe an underestimation of T1 and T2 in the case of MRF, while they seem more feasible when employing the concept of pSFFP.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0428