In vivo Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) in cardiac MRI
Yan Wen1, Thanh D. Nguyen2, Zhe Liu1, Pascal Spincemaille2, Dong Zhou2, Alexey Dimov1, Youngwook Kee2, Jiwon Kim3, Jonathan W. Weinsaft3, and Yi Wang1,2

1Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, New York, NY, United States, 2Physics in Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 3Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States

Synopsis

Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) has yet to be applied on cardiac patients due to the challenges from motion artifacts and background fields. In this first attempt to apply QSM in cardiac MRI, we overcome these data acquisition and processing challenges by using robust graph cut phase analysis and a novel preconditioned inversion of total field. Our preliminary results demonstrate high quality susceptibility maps, and the measured heart chamber blood oxygenation level is consistent with reported values from literature.

Purpose

We aim to demonstrate the feasibility of in vivo cardiac Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) for non-invasive quantification of venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) within the heart chambers, which may play an important role in the detection and management of cardiac shunt and pulmonary disorders.

Methods

Eight healthy volunteers were scanned using an ECG gated multi-slice multi-echo 2D-FGRE sequence at 1.5T using an 8-channel cardiac coil with the following scan parameters: 8 echoes, first TE≈3.6ms, $$$\triangle$$$TE≈2.2ms, TR≈23ms, voxel size≈1.25x1.25x5mm3, acquisition resolution=192x192, 8 views per heartbeat, flow compensation in the readout and slice directions, ASSET acceleration factor=1.5, and breath hold≈15 seconds per slice. A stack of 20 short-axis images were acquired for each subject. From the multi-echo complex data, an unwrapped field map was obtained using a magnitude image guided graph cut method1. Chemical shift from fat was removed via an iterative chemical shift update2. Because of the close proximity of myocardium and lung, background field removal was incorporated into the L1 MEDI3 method, such that the susceptibility map was obtained from the total field directly. This method allowed the solution to have susceptibility sources both inside and outside the ROI to account for both local field and background field. A diagonal preconditioner $$$P$$$, which was set to 1 and 40 for inside and outside the ROI, respectively, was introduced to improve the convergence speed:

$$y^*=argmin_y\frac{1}{2}||w(Mf-Md\otimes(P\cdot y))||^2_2+\lambda||M_G\triangledown(P\cdot y)||_1$$

Where $$$w$$$ is a noise weighting term, $$$M$$$ is one inside ROI and zero outside, $$$f$$$ is the total field, $$$d$$$ is the dipole kernel, $$$\otimes$$$ is a convolution operator, $$$\lambda$$$ is the regularization parameter, $$$M_G$$$ is a binary edge Mask, and $$$\triangledown$$$ is the gradient operator. The susceptibility is then $$$\chi=P\cdot y^*$$$. Figure 1 shows a flow chart that demonstrates the steps for processing the phase data. For comparison, we computed the QSM from standard processing scheme (PDF4+MEDI) as well.

The ROI for left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) were obtained through manual segmentation. The susceptibilities in LV and RV were calculated as the average over the respective ROI, and the susceptibility difference between LV and RV was scaled to obtain SvO­2 value5.

Results

The mean susceptibility difference between RV (deoxygenated blood) and LV (almost fully oxygenated blood) from the QSM generated with preconditioned MEDI using the total field as the input was 292ppb±79ppb. Assuming the blood in LV is 100% oxygenated, the mean SvO2 in these eight healthy volunteers was 78.1%±5.1%. The mean susceptibility difference between RV and LV from the QSM generated with PDF + MEDI was 286ppb±102ppb, and the corresponding mean SvO2 was 78.6%±7.5%. Figure 2 shows a visual comparison between the QSM map from processing with PDF+MEDI, and preconditioned MEDI with total field as the input. Figure 3 shows the magnitude and the QSM images of three healthy volunteer.

Discussion

Our preliminary data demonstrated, for the first time, high quality in vivo cardiac QSM. The SvO2 derived in this study with QSM is about 8% larger than the expected value, which is about 70%. This higher derived SvO2 could be attributed to the decreasing oxygenation level in the LV during breath hold. According to literature6, the oxygenation level in LV will decreased by about 8.6% at the end of a 15 seconds breath hold. The susceptibility in RV should remain the same for a 15 seconds breath hold.

Our proposed cardiac QSM employs graph cut phase analysis that provides robust fat water separation, which is needed to deal with epicardial fat and other fat in the chest and liver. The preconditioned total field inversion eliminates artifacts in the myocardium from standard QSM caused by errors from imperfect background field removal. Although both processing scheme yielded similar SvO2, the standard processing scheme produces QSM map with obvious artifact, which can hinder its diagnostic value.

Conclusion

We have demonstrated the feasibility of high quality in vivo cardiac QSM with graph cut phase analysis and preconditioned total field inversion. Future work will focus on accelerated 3D acquisition, and applications of cardiac QSM in various cardiac diseases.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge support from NIH grants RO1 EB013443 and RO1 NS090464.

References

1. Dong J, Liu T, Chen F, Zhou D, Dimov A, Raj A, Cheng Q, Spincemaille P, Wang Y., "Simultaneous Phase Unwrapping and Removal of Chemical Shift (SPURS) Using Graph Cuts: Application in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping," in Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on, 2015. 34(2), 531-540.

2. Dimov A. V., Liu T., Spincemaille P., Ecanow J. S., Tan H., Edelman R. R. and Wang Y., Joint estimation of chemical shift and quantitative susceptibility mapping (chemical QSM). Magn Reson Med, 2015, 73: 2100–2110.

3. Liu J, Liu T, de Rochefort L, Ledoux J, Khalidov I, Chen W, Tsiouris AJ, Wisnieff C, Spincemaille P, Prince MR, Wang Y., Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map, NeuroImage, 2012, 59(3),2560-2568.

4. Liu T, Khalidov I, de Rochefort L, Spincemaille P, Liu J, Tsiouris AJ, Wang Y., A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF). NMR in biomedicine, 2011;24(9):1129-1136.

5. Jain V., Abdulmalik O., Propert K. J. and Wehrli F. W., Investigating the magnetic susceptibility properties of fresh human blood for noninvasive oxygen saturation quantification. Magn Reson Med, 2012, 68, 863–867.

6. Sasse SA, Berry RB, Nguyen TK, Light RW, Mahutte CK., Kees M. Arterial blood gas changes during breath-holding from functional residual capacity. CHEST, 1996; 110:958–64.

Figures

Figure 1. A flow chart demonstrating the processing steps from multi-echo complex data to QSM.

Figure 2. Comparison between the QSM from standard PDF + MEDI processing scheme (left) and the QSM from preconditioned MEDI with total field as the input (right). The artifacts (white arrow) in the myocardium were significantly reduced with the latter method.

Figure 3. Magnitude (top row) and QSM (bottom row) images of three healthy volunteers.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0417