Jens Wetzl1,2, Felix Lugauer1, Michaela Schmidt3, Andreas Maier1,2, Joachim Hornegger1,2, and Christoph Forman3
1Pattern Recognition Lab, Department of Computer Science, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany, 2Erlangen Graduate School in Advanced Optical Technologies, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany, 3Magnetic Resonance, Product Definition and Innovation, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
Synopsis
We present a method for free-breathing, isotropic 3-D CINE imaging of the whole heart, demonstrated with experiments in 7 healthy volunteers. Respiratory information for retrospective gating is derived directly from the imaging data. Ventricular function parameters were compared to reference 2-D CINE acquisitions. Excellent image quality and match to ground truth ventricular function parameters could be achieved in an acquisition time similar to multi-slice 2-D CINE with equivalent coverage. Cartesian sampling combined with dual-GPU acceleration enabled a fast reconstruction in under 5 minutes for left-ventricular and under 7 minutes for whole heart coverage.Introduction
The current gold standard for the evaluation of cardiac function is 2-D CINE imaging, commonly acquired in multiple breath-holds, featuring high in-plane resolution, but thick slices. Recently, 3-D CINE acquisitions with isotropic resolution have been proposed, e.g. free-breathing radial 3-D CINE [1], which requires a computationally expensive reconstruction, or single breath-hold Cartesian 3-D CINE [2], which requires patient cooperation and breath-hold capability. To address these limitations, we propose a method for free-breathing, isotropic Cartesian 3-D CINE imaging.
Methods
Free-breathing 3-D CINE imaging in short-axis (SA) orientation was performed in 7 healthy volunteers ($$$1$$$ female, age $$$30{}\pm{}13$$$) on a $$$1.5\,\text{T}$$$ clinical MR scanner (MAGNETOM Aera, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). One acquisition covered just the left ventricle (LV), another covered the whole heart (WH). A 3-D volume-selective, ECG-gated, bSSFP prototype imaging sequence with the following parameters was used: TR = $$$2.8\,\text{ms}$$$, TE = $$$1.2\,\text{ms}$$$, $$$\alpha=38^\circ$$$, FOV for LV = $$$395{}\times{}(237{}\pm{}10){}\times{}(110\pm{}11)\,\text{mm}^3$$$, FOV for WH = $$$395{}\times{}(237{}\pm{}10){}\times{}(153\pm{}16)\,\text{mm}^3$$$, acquired voxel size $$$1.9\times{}2.1\times{}2.5\,\text{mm}^3$$$, interpolated to $$$(1.9\,\text{mm})^3$$$, temporal resolution $$$42\,\text{ms}$$$, fixed acceleration factor of $$$2.6$$$ compared to the fully-sampled matrix and a receiver bandwidth of $$$1000\,\text{Hz/px}$$$. For signal reception, 18$$$+$$$12 elements of an anterior $$$+$$$ posterior local coil matrix were used. For reference, a $$$12$$$-slice SA 2-D bSSFP acquisition with $$$\alpha=54^\circ$$$ and retrospective ECG gating in multiple breath-holds was performed to cover the LV with similar temporal resolution, identical in-plane resolution and a slice thickness of $$$8\,\text{mm}$$$.
Incoherent sub-sampling of the Cartesian phase-encoding plane was achieved with a spiral spokes sampling pattern, where the starting points for readouts within each phase are chosen along a spiral arm, and subsequent spiral arms are rotated by the golden angle (see Figure 1). As the first sample of each spoke is the k-space center, the sequence is suitable for respiratory self-gating [3]. In every such readout, the lung-liver boundary was tracked to obtain a 1-D respiratory signal (see Figure 2). Retrospective respiratory self-gating to end-expiration resulted in an effective undersampling factor of $$$11\pm{}6$$$ for LV and $$$14\pm{}7$$$ for WH 3-D CINE.
After a Fourier transform along the fully sampled readout, prototype image reconstruction for each phase-encoding plane was then performed using the mFISTA algorithm [4] with spatiotemporal wavelet regularization and incorporating two coil sensitivity maps (CSM) per receive channel to deal with wrapping in the phase-encoding direction [5]:
$$\{\hat{\boldsymbol{x}}_1,\hat{\boldsymbol{x}}_2\}=\underset{\{\boldsymbol{x}_1,\boldsymbol{x}_2\}}{\operatorname{argmin}}\sum_c\left\Vert\boldsymbol{A}\boldsymbol{F}\left(\textstyle\sum_{i=1}^2\boldsymbol{S}_{c,i}\boldsymbol{x}_i\right)-\boldsymbol{y}_c\right\Vert_2^2+\lambda\textstyle\sum_{i=1}^2\Vert\boldsymbol{W}\boldsymbol{x}_i\Vert_1,$$
where $$$\boldsymbol{A}$$$ is the sampling pattern, $$$\boldsymbol{F}$$$ is the Fourier transform, $$$\boldsymbol{S}_{c,i}$$$ is the $$$i^\text{th}$$$ CSM belonging to coil $$$c$$$, $$$\boldsymbol{y}_c$$$ is the measured data of coil $$$c$$$, $$$\boldsymbol{W}$$$ is the wavelet transform and $$$\lambda$$$ is the regularization parameter. This image reconstruction was fully integrated into the scanner software and multi-GPU-accelerated. The optimization was run for $$$40$$$ iterations with $$$\lambda=2\cdot{}10^{-3}$$$ of the maximum intensity.
For evaluation, we compared the acquisition and reconstruction times, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) as well as ventricular function (VF) parameters computed manually from the images of the gold standard 2-D CINE and our proposed 3-D CINE in corresponding slices of both LV data sets.
Results and Discussion
Qualitative results of the LV and WH 3-D CINE are shown in Figure 3. Quantitative results for acquisition time, reconstruction time and CNR are given in Table 1 and for VF parameters in Figure 4.
The high effective undersampling enabled free-breathing isotropic 3-D CINE with an acquisition time similar to the reference 2-D CINE. The lower CNR for 3-D CINE is due to the lower flip angle (because of SAR restrictions) and inflow effects, the latter causing the further drop from LV to WH 3-D CINE. A slight underestimation of the end-diastolic volume in the 3-D CINE, $$$1.8\,\text{ml}$$$ on average, is caused by prospective ECG triggering compared to retrospective ECG gating used by the 2-D CINE [6]. The end-systolic volume is overestimated by $$$1.6\,\text{ml}$$$ on average, most likely due to temporal regularization during reconstruction.
Conclusions
We have presented free-breathing isotropic Cartesian 3-D CINE of the whole heart, using retrospective respiratory self-gating. Excellent image quality and match to ground truth VF parameters could be achieved (see Figures 3 and 4). Using the described sampling pattern, retrospective data selection can be applied arbitrarily, e.g. it would also allow retrospective ECG gating instead of prospective ECG triggering, as used in the current study. Cartesian sampling combined with dual-GPU acceleration allows image reconstruction in a clinically feasible range of under 5 (7) minutes for LV (WH). An acquisition in sagittal or coronal orientation is also possible and would remove the need to determine the short-axis orientation. Reduced CNR could be addressed using interleaved $$$T_2$$$ preparation pulses [1]. As future work, a reconstruction using data from all respiratory phases with some form of compensation could further shorten the acquisition time.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding of the Erlangen Graduate School in Advanced Optical Technologies (SAOT) by the German Research Foundation (DFG) in the framework of the German excellence initiative.References
[1] S. Coppo et al. "Free-running 4D whole-heart self-navigated golden angle MRI: Initial results". Magn. Reson. Med. 74(5):1306-1316, 2015.
[2] J. Wetzl et al. "Isotropic 3-D CINE Imaging with Sub-2mm Resolution in a Single Breath-Hold".
Proc. ISMRM \#1011, 2015.
[3] D. Piccini et al. "Respiratory self-navigation for whole-heart bright-blood coronary MRI: methods for robust isolation and automatic segmentation of the blood pool". Magn. Reson. Med. 68(2):571-9, 2012.
[4] J. Liu et al. "Dynamic cardiac MRI reconstruction with weighted redundant Haar wavelets". Proc. ISMRM \#178, 2012.
[5] M. Uecker et al. "ESPIRiT – an eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: where SENSE meets GRAPPA". Magn. Reson. Med. 71:990–1001, 2014.
[6] G. Vincenti et al. "Compressed Sensing Single-Breath-Hold CMR for Fast Quantification of LV Function, Volumes, and Mass". JACC, 7(9):882-92, 2014.