Yong Chen1, Shivani Pahwa1, Jesse Hamilton2, Sara Dastmalchian1, Donna Plecha3, Nicole Seiberlich2, Mark Griswold1, and Vikas Gulani1
1Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States, 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States, 3Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
Synopsis
In this study, a rapid relaxometry method was developed for breast
imaging using the MRF technique, which allows simultaneous and volumetric
quantification of T1 and T2 relaxation times for breast
tissues.Target Audience
This
work targets those interested in fast quantitative imaging and breast MRI.
Purpose
MRI
is increasingly important in breast imaging for lesion detection and
characterization. While it provides high sensitivity (approximately 90%), its
specificity is relatively low (between 37% and 86%) because many benign lesions
exhibit features similar to cancer
1. Previous breast MRI has also demonstrated
significant difference in both T
1 and T
2 relaxation times
between malignant and benign lesions
2. However, quantitative
measurements of relaxation times are rarely performed in clinical settings because
of the long scan time, especially for volumetric coverage. Recently, a new
quantitative imaging framework, named MR Fingerprinting (MRF), has been
introduced, which can provide rapid and simultaneous quantification of both T
1
and T
2 relaxation times
3. The objective of this study is
to adopt this MRF framework to develop a quantitative method for 3D relaxometry
in breast imaging.
Methods
The MRI experiments were performed on a Siemens 3T Verio scanner using a
breast coil with 12 receive elements. A FISP-based MRF method, which was
originally developed for 2D cardiac imaging, was modified for 3D breast imaging4.
The MRF data were acquired sequentially through partitions, as shown in Fig. 1.
For each partition, the data acquisition was divided into 16 segments, each
with a different combination of a fat-saturation module, a inversion-recovery
module and T2-sensitivity module for effective T1 and T2
sensitivity. In the following data acquisition window, 48 uniform-density
spiral arms were acquired in 48 TRs with variable flip angles ranging from 5°
to 12°. A high in-plane reduction factor of 48 was used, so only one spiral arm
was acquired for each partition within a 3D volume. The same combination of
preparation modules and flip angle pattern was repeated for each partition and
a constant time delay of 5sec was applied between partitions for the longitudinal
recovery. Other imaging parameters included: FOV=40×40cm; matrix size 256×256; slice
thickness 3mm; number of partitions, 16; partial Fourier in the partition
direction, 6/8. The overall acquisition time for 16 partitions was about 3.5min.
To retrieve tissue properties (T1, T2
and proton density) from the MRF measurement,
a dictionary including the signal evolutions from all possible combinations of
parameters for a T1 range of 100 to 3000ms and T2 range
of 10 to 500ms was calculated using Bloch simulations3. The acquired
signal in each voxel of the highly undersampled volumes were then matched to an
entry in the dictionary using pattern matching, which yielded all underlying tissue
parameters used to generate this dictionary entry.
The accuracy of the proposed method was first
validated using a phantom and the results were compared to those acquired from the
standard method using the single-echo spin-echo sequences. The method was then
applied to three normal volunteers (mean age, 21.3 years) and informed consent
was obtained from all volunteers.
Results
Fig. 2 shows the results of T1 and T2 relaxation
times acquired from the central partition in a phantom experiment. A close
match to the results from the standard method was observed for a large range of
T1 (200~1600 ms) and T2 (20~105ms) values. Fig. 3 shows
the average T1 and T2 values measured from the 10 vials
in all 16 partitions. Despite of a small variation in T1 (2.6%±2.1%)
and T2 values (11.1%±14.1%) at the end partitions, a consistent
measurement was observed with a T1 variation of 0.8%±0.3% and a T2
variation of 3.5%±2.7% across the central 14 partitions.
Fig. 4 shows representative T1, T2
and proton density maps acquired from a normal volunteer. The 8 odd numbered partitions
out of a total of 16 partitions are presented and the rest are omitted here for
ease of viewing. An average T1 of 1449±163ms and T2 of 50±7ms
for fibroglandular tissues were obtained from the three normal subjects, which
agrees well with the literature values acquired from 3T5.
Discussion and Conclusion
In the current study, a rapid and accurate volumetric
relaxometry method was developed for breast imaging using the MRF technique and
the method was tested in both phantom studies and normal subjects. A small
variation mainly in T
2 relaxation times was observed at the edge partitions,
which likely relates to slice profile uniformity. This variation can be
corrected in the future by including the slice profile in the Bloch simulation.
In this proof-of-concept study, a limited number of partitions were acquired in
3.5min with no data acceleration or undersampling along the partition direction.
Data undersampling in this direction will be explored in the future to achieve whole-breast
coverage within a similar time window.
Acknowledgements
Siemens
Healthcare and NIH grants 1R01DK098503, R00EB011527, 1R01HL094557, and
2KL2TR000440.References
1.
Jacob MA, et al. Radiol, 2003;229:225–232.
2. Merchant TE, et al. Acta Radiol,
1993;34:356-361.
3. Dan M, et al. Nature, 2013; 187–192.
4. Hamilton JI, et al.
Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 2015;26.
5. Rakow-Penner R, et al. JMRI,
2006;23:87-91.