M. Arcan Erturk1, Alexander J Raaijmakers2, Gregor Adriany1, Kamil Ugurbil1, and Gregory J Metzger1
1Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States, 2Imaging Division, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Synopsis
We
developed a 16-channel transceiver body array (16LD) by combining loop and
dipole elements, and compared performance against 16-channel microstrip-line
(16ML) and 10-channel fractionated dipole antenna (10DA) arrays. Complementary
field characteristics of loop and dipole elements were utilized by
symmetrically placing them along their long-axes. The loop-dipole combination allowed
increased channel counts and density while limiting inter-element coupling. The
16LD had improved transmit and receive performance over the 16ML and 10DA in
both simulations and experiments. Images of the prostate, kidneys and heart
were acquired showing the potential of the 16LD to successfully image targets
throughout the body at 7.0T.Purpose
To develop a 16-channel transceiver body imaging array at
7.0T with improved transmit, receive and SAR performance by combining loop and
dipole elements and utilizing their complementary field characteristics.
Methods
The 16-channel loop-dipole transceiver array (16LD)
consisted of 8 identical loop-dipole building blocks (LD), with each block
containing a fractionated dipole antenna [1] and an 8x18cm2 rectangular loop coil (Figure 1.a). The dipole and loop elements were etched on separate
FR4 boards, tuned/matched using fixed value capacitors and aligned along their
long-axes at their center locations. Precise relative placement of the two
elements was crucial to achieve decoupling performance <-15dB.
Two
housings made of vinyl fabric each contained four LD blocks with a
center-to-center distance of ~11.5cm between the neighboring blocks (Figure
1.b-c). Flexibility of the housing was essential in conforming the elements to
subjects with differing body sizes and shapes to maintain performance by
providing designed loading conditions.
The
16LD was modeled around anatomically relevant locations on the torso and pelvis
of an anatomically correct human model (Duke, Virtual Family [2]). EM-field distributions of each coil element were
computed using an FDTD solver in SEMCAD X software (SPEAG, Zürich, Switzerland)
and were imported to Matlab (Mathworks, Natick, MA) to investigate
shim-dependent B1+ and SAR distributions. Time-average
power (TAP) limits yielding 20W/kg peak 10g averaged SAR and 4W/kg partial body
SAR were calculated for safe operation in the prostate, kidney and heart. Furthermore,
B1+ transmit efficiency normalized to unit total coil
power, B1+ SAR efficiency normalized to peak 10g-averaged
SAR, and SNR in the prostate were calculated for comparison with in vivo measurements.
MRI experiments were conducted on a
whole-body Magnetom 7.0T scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany)
equipped with sixteen 1kW power amplifiers. B1+ transmit efficiency and SNR of the 16LD was
measured inside the prostate of five healthy consented subjects, using
the methods in Ref. [3]. The experimental transmit/receive
performance of the 16LD was compared against two existing transceiver arrays:
16-channel microstrip-line (16ML) [4] and a 10-channel version of the fractionated dipole
antenna (10DA) arrays [1]. The subjects for the 16ML and 10DA data included 5
healthy male volunteers with BMIs and AP dimensions covering a similar range. Anatomical
MRI of the prostate, kidneys and the heart were acquired on healthy male
volunteers with the 16LD using TAP limits determined from simulations.
Results
Simulated transmit and receive performance
of the 16LD, 16ML and 10DA are listed in Table 1.
TAP limits for the 16LD were imposed by local 10g-averaged SAR when
the excitation voltage of the loop elements were >-7dB of the dipole
elements, and by partial-body SAR when the excitation voltages of the loop
elements were ≤-7dB of the dipole elements. B1+ transmit
efficiency of the 16LD was >30% higher than the 16ML and 10DA. Compared to
the 16ML and 10DA, the B1+ local SAR efficiency of the
16LD was 45.8% and 38.5% higher, and the SNR of the 16LD was 49.5% and 36.0%
higher, respectively. The 16LD outperformed both 16ML and 10DA in terms of B1+
transmit efficiency, B1+ local SAR efficiency,
peak B1+, and SNR by at least 30% in
simulations on Duke.
Experimentally measured B1+
transmit efficiency and SNR of the 16LD inside the prostate
are plotted in Figure 2 in comparison to the 16ML and 10DA with the horizontal
axis showing the AP dimension of the subjects. The 16LD had on average, 29.1%
and 20.0% higher B1+ transmit efficiency, 29.1% and 51.8%
higher peak B1+, and 26.9% and 20.4% higher SNR compared
to 16ML and 10DA, respectively.
Anatomical prostate MRI along axial and
coronal views are shown in Figure 3. Coronal MRI of the kidneys and
four-chamber view of the heart acquired using 16LD are shown in Figure 4.
Discussion/Conclusion
Combining
loop and dipole elements maintained both the higher transmit and receive
performance of the loop elements at shallower depths and the improved
performance of the dipole elements at greater depths while simultaneously
improving SAR performance due to the distinct E-field distributions of the loop
and dipole elements. Furthermore, the loop-dipole combination increased channel
count and density beyond what can be currently achieved when using dipole
elements alone if relying on distance-based decoupling. The 16LD outperformed 16ML
and 10DA in both simulations and experiments in terms of transmit and receive
performance inside the prostate. MRI of the prostate, kidneys and the heart
were acquired using the 16LD on healthy subjects showing the potential of this
RF coil design to successfully image targets throughout the body at 7.0T.
Acknowledgements
Supported by: NCI R01 CA155268, NIBIB P41 EB015894.References
[1] Raaijmakers,
A.J., et al., The fractionated dipole antenna: A new antenna for body imaging at 7 Tesla. Magn Reson Med, 2015. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25596.
[2] Christ, A., et al., The Virtual Family--development of
surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric
simulations. Phys Med Biol, 2010. 55(2):
p. N23-38.
[3] Erturk, M.A., et al. Comparison of 16-Channel Stripline and
10-Channel Fractionated Dipole Transceive Arrays for Body Imaging at 7T. in
International Society for Magnetic
Resonance In Medicine 23rd Annual Meeting & Exhibition. 2015. Toronto,
Canada, p3122.
[4] Snyder, C.J., et al., Comparison between eight- and
sixteen-channel TEM transceive arrays for body imaging at 7 T. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine, 2012. 67(4):
p. 954-64.