M. Arcan Erturk1, Gregor Adriany1, Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele1, Yigitcan Eryaman1, Alexander J Raaijmakers2, Lance DelaBarre1, Edward Auerbach1, J. Thomas Vaughan1, Kamil Ugurbil1, and Gregory J Metzger1
1Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States, 2Imaging Division, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Synopsis
We have developed a fractionated dipole antenna (fDA) for
body imaging at 10.5T, investigated its electro-magnetic field behavior in a
10-channel array using numerical simulations in a human model, and compared its
performance to a 10-channel fDA array at 7.0T. The 10.5T fDA array provided
similar B1+ transmit efficiency and peak 10g-averaged SAR compared to the 7.0T
array inside the prostate, however had a less uniform B1+ distribution.
Simulation results indicated that fDA elements have sufficient B1+ penetration
at 10.5T, but B1+ non-uniformities may need to be alleviated even in small
imaging targets using dynamic RF strategies including parallel transmit.Introduction
Linear
(“dipole-like”) currents are becoming increasingly dominant in ultimate SNR
considerations at higher magnetic-field strengths [1]. Here, we design
and implement a 10-channel array consisting of fractionated dipole antenna
(fDA) elements for body imaging at 10.5T and investigate its electro-magnetic
field performance in comparison with a fDA array at 7.0T [2] using numerical simulations and experimental studies on phantoms
as human imaging is not yet approved at 10.5T but will be performed subsequent
to pending FDA and IRB approval.
Methods
The 7.0T elements were replicas of the 30cm-long fDA
elements developed by Raaijmakers et al. [2] (Figure 1.a). The 10.5T fDA elements
were designed using the approach in Ref. [2], resulting in 21cm-long elements with
1cm-wide conductors and two 26mm-wide meanders on each pole (Figure 1.b). The 10.5T
elements were matched to 50Ω using a lattice-balun network. fDA arrays at both
field-strengths consisted of 10-elements housed in flexible fabric covers with a
~9cm center-to-center distance between neighboring elements (10.5T array, Figure
1.c). Six-elements were placed anteriorly and remaining four-elements were
placed posteriorly.
The fDA arrays were modeled around the pelvis of an
anatomically correct human model (Duke, Virtual Family [3]), with the elements placed at
identical locations at both field strengths. Conductors of the fDA elements
were placed 2cm off the surface of the skin, and the meshing size of the
tissues of the human model were ≤1mm. EM-field distributions of each fDA
element were computed using an FDTD solver in SEMCAD X software (SPEAG, Zürich,
Switzerland) at 297.2MHz and 447MHz. EM-fields were imported to Matlab
(Mathworks, Natick, MA) and phase-only shimming was applied to investigate
shim-dependent B1+ and SAR distributions. Peak local
10g-averaged SAR was calculated using virtual observation points (VOP) [4]. Worst-case 10g-averaged local SAR was
determined by computing the highest SAR in VOP that can be reached using a
phase-only shim. B1+ transmit efficiency normalized to
unit total coil power and B1+ SAR efficiency normalized
to peak 10g SAR were calculated. Uniformity of the
field distribution was assessed by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV) of the
B1+ magnitude inside the prostate.
A demonstration of
the fDA array was conducted on a whole-body Magnetom 10.5T scanner (Siemens
Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) equipped with sixteen 2kW power amplifiers, in a
torso-sized phantom. Phase-only B1+ efficiency shimming was performed on a 4cm2-square
anterior to an inner tube along the central slice, the approximate position of
a prostate. The B1+ distribution inside the phantom was calculated
experimentally using the actual flip-angle method [5] and numerically using SEMCAD.
Results
Numerically computed B1+ transmit efficiency is plotted
against the CV inside the prostate for the 10-channel fDA arrays (Figure 2.a). The
7.0T array provided a more uniform B1+ distribution however the 10.5T array
provided 2.3% higher B1+ efficiency. Peak 10g local SAR was the limiting factor
for RF safety at both field strengths for the investigated shim settings. B1+
SAR efficiency within the prostate normalized to peak 10g SAR is plotted in
Figure 2.b. Transmit performance metrics of the peak B1+ efficiency shims at
7.0T and 10.5T (Shim A), and efficiency-homogeneity tradeoff shim at 10.5T (Shim
B) are listed in Table 1. B1+ distributions along an axial-slice intersecting
the prostate are shown in Figure 3 (corresponding shims are annotated in Figure
2). The 7.0T array provided 2.0% and 11.8% higher B1+ per unit peak 10g SAR
compared to Shim A and B at 10.5T, respectively. Worst-case 10g-averaged SAR
with phase-only shimming was 31.5% higher at 10.5T (Table 1).
Simulated and measured B1+ distributions inside the
phantom at 10.5T are shown in Figure 4.a-b, respectively, with the square
annotations showing the B1+ shimming region. Simulated B1+ distributions
demonstrate good agreement with the experimental acquisitions.
Discussion/Conclusion
Prior to receiving approval to run in vivo studies, we
have designed, evaluated and tested the performance of a fDA array for body
imaging at 10.5T on a phantom and a numerical human model. Comparisons of the two
arrays were performed in the prostate due to its central location inside the
body and small size where basic shimming methods are generally suitable at 7.0T
[6]. Simulations comparing similar array
configurations at 7.0T and 10.5T show promising results at 10.5T with only slight
decrease in B1+ SAR efficiency. Large SAR increases (often predicted to scale quadratically
with field strength) were not observed. Transmit homogeneity with simple RF
management strategies (i.e. phase-only static shimming) decreased considerably
at 10.5T even in the small target region studied. However this relative
degradation in B1+ homogeneity at higher frequencies can be rectified with dynamic
RF management strategies.
Acknowledgements
Supported by:
NIBIB P41 EB015894, NIH S10 RR029672, NCI R01 CA155268References
[1] Lattanzi,
R. and D.K. Sodickson, Ideal current
patterns yielding optimal signal-to-noise ratio and specific absorption rate in
magnetic resonance imaging: computational methods and physical insights.
Magn Reson Med, 2012. 68(1): p.
286-304.
[2] Raaijmakers, A. J.E., Italiaander, M., Voogt, I. J., Luijten, P. R., Hoogduin, J. M., Klomp, D. W.J. and van den Berg, C. A.T. (2015), The fractionated dipole antenna: A new antenna for body imaging at 7 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25596.
[3] Christ, A., et al., The Virtual Family--development of surface-based
anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations.
Phys Med Biol, 2010. 55(2): p.
N23-38.
[4] Eichfelder, G. and M. Gebhardt, Local specific absorption rate control for
parallel transmission by virtual observation points. Magn Reson Med, 2011. 66(5): p. 1468-76.
[5] Yarnykh, V.L., Actual flip-angle imaging in the pulsed steady state: a method for
rapid three-dimensional mapping of the transmitted radiofrequency field.
Magn Reson Med, 2007. 57(1): p.
192-200.
[6] Metzger, G.J., et al., Local B1+ shimming for prostate imaging with
transceiver arrays at 7T based on subject-dependent transmit phase
measurements. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2008. 59(2): p. 396-409.