Synopsis
We present a multislice short-TE 1H-MRSI method to achieve fast, ultrahigh-resolution metabolic imaging of rats on a 9.4 Tesla animal scanner. The proposed method uses a subspace-based hybrid data acquisition strategy and a low-rank-model-based image reconstruction scheme. In vivo experiments have been performed to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed method. We are able to produce high-SNR, spatially resolved metabolic profiles from the rat brain with 1x1x2mm3 nominal resolution
in 16 minutes.Introduction
Metabolic imaging of small animals using MRSI is an important tool for studying basic neurobiological processes and various disease
models (e.g., cancer, neurological disorders and psychiatric diseases), and for
developing new therapeutic procedures and their preclinical
translation.
1 The development of advanced ultrahigh field animal scanners
presents new opportunities in tackling the sensitivity and resolution
challenges associated with animal imaging. However, due to the restricted
tradeoffs of SNR, imaging speed, and resolution for MRSI, most metabolic
studies still limit to single-voxel spectroscopy or slow phase-encoding-based chemical-shift imaging schemes.
2,3 We present here a new method to achieve
fast, ultrahigh-resolution 1H-MRSI on a 9.4T animal system, using
subspace-based data acquisition and image reconstruction strategies. The
proposed method is able to produce high-SNR, spatially resolved metabolic
profiles from the rat brain with 1x1x2mm
3 nominal
resolution in 16 minutes.
Methods
Data Acquisition
To achieve accelerated acquisition for high-resolution MRSI, we use a special hybrid sampling strategy. Specifically, we developed a dual-density, dual-speed echo-planar spectroscopic imaging (EPSI) sequence on a 9.4T Bruker system (ParaVision 6.0.1). The sequence contains a low-bandwidth (BW), low-resolution EPSI scan to generate a set of high-SNR and spectrally fully-sampled training data, and a high-BW, high-resolution EPSI scan to generate a set of imaging data. This strategy is based on a low-dimensional subspace model that exploits the spatiospectral
correlation in the spatiospectral function of interest.4 More specifically, the training data is for determining the subspace structure while the imaging data is for final spatiospectral reconstruction (See Image Reconstruction).
A multislice encoding scheme
was used to achieve large brain coverage and avoid the truncation effects for
3D encoding due to limited encodings along the slice direction. Short-TE spin-echo acquisition was used to further improve the SNR. In addition, since most
spectral components of interest for 1H-MRSI reside in 0-4ppm, the center
frequency was adjusted to 2.3ppm, which enables a reduction of the sampling bandwidth due to reduced spectral bandwidth requirement.
Image
Reconstruction
The nuisance water
and lipid signals were first removed from both the training and imaging data, using
the method in 5. The nuisance-signal-removed data, denoted as $$$s(\mathbf{k},t)$$$,
was then modeled as
\begin{eqnarray*}
s(\mathbf{k},t) & = &
\int\left(\sum_{l_{m}=1}^{L_{m}}u_{l_{m}}(\mathbf{r})v_{l_{m}}(t)+\sum_{l_{b}=1}^{L_{b}}u_{l_{b}}(\mathbf{r})v_{l_{b}}(t)\right)e^{-i2\pi\Delta
f(\mathbf{r})t}e^{-i2\pi\mathbf{k}\mathbf{r}}d\mathbf{r} + \eta(\mathbf{k},t) \\
\end{eqnarray*}
where
$$$\sum_{l_m=1}^{L_m}u_{l_m}(\mathbf{r})v_{l_m}(t)$$$ and $$$\sum_{l_{b}=1}^{L_{b}}u_{l_{b}}(\mathbf{r})v_{l_{b}}(t)$$$
are subspace models for the metabolite and baseline signals, respectively,
$$$L_m$$$ and $$$L_b$$$ the corresponding model orders (typically a small number), $$$\Delta
f(\mathbf{r})$$$ the B0 map and $$$\eta(\mathbf{k},t)$$$ the noise. The baseline component
was incorporated for very short-echo acquisitions. This model significantly reduces the degrees-of-freedom, making high-SNR and high-resolution reconstruction possible. Specifically, $$$\left\{v_{l_m}(.)\right\}$$$ and
$$$\left\{v_{l_b}(.)\right\}$$$ were estimated from the training data4,6. Image
reconstruction was then done by estimating $$$\left\{u_{l_m}(.)\right\}$$$ and $$$\left\{u_{l_{b}}(.)\right\}$$$
using the following regularized least-squares formulation (with proper discretization)
\begin{eqnarray}\hat{\mathbf{U}}_{m},\hat{\mathbf{U}}_{b} & =
& \arg\underset{\mathbf{U}_{m},\mathbf{U}_{b}}\min\left\Vert
\mathbf{s}-\mathcal{F}_{\Omega}\left\{
\mathbf{B}\odot\left(\mathbf{U}_{m}\mathbf{V}_{m}+\mathbf{U}_{b}\mathbf{V}_{b}\right)\right\}
\right\Vert _{2}^{2}\nonumber \\ & & +\lambda_{1}\left\Vert
\mathbf{D}_{w}\mathbf{U}_{m}\right\Vert _{F}^{2}+\lambda_{2}\left\Vert
\mathbf{U}_{b}\mathbf{V}_b\mathbf{F}\mathbf{D}_{f}\right\Vert
_{F}^{2},\label{eq:recon}\\\nonumber \end{eqnarray}
where the first term measures data fidelity, $$$\mathbf{B}$$$ models the B0 field inhomogeneity,
$$$\mathcal{F}_{\Omega}$$$ is a Fourier encoding operator and $$$\mathbf{s}$$$
contains the imaging data. The regularization terms enforce spatial edge-preserving
smoothness on the metabolite signal and spectral smoothness on the baseline
signal, respectively. $$$\mathbf{D}_w$$$ and $$$\mathbf{D}_f$$$ perform spatial and spectral finite differences.
Results
Data were acquired from a healthy rat brain (using a receive-only surface coil). The imaging parameters were: FOV = 40x40mm
2, slice thickness =
2mm, TR/TE = 2200/15ms, the training data matrix size = 16x16, the imaging data matrix size = 40x40 (1x1mm
2 nominal resolution), and water
suppression BW = 180Hz. The readout BWs for the training and imaging data were 100 and 200kHz, respectively. The acquisition time for the imaging data was about
16min. The B
0 map was from an EPSI scan without water suppression. The experimental setup is illustrated in Fig. 1. Four slices
were acquired. $$$L_m = 8$$$ and $$$L_b=4$$$ were used for reconstruction based on SVD analysis. Figure 2 shows representative spectra from three voxels. As can be seen, the proposed method is able to produce high-SNR
spectra, resolving regional differences of the metabolites. The NAA and
glutamate maps (Fig. 3) also have very high quality (e.g., identifying features such as ventricle where low signal is expected). A comparison to Fourier reconstruction of the original EPSI data further demonstrates the capability of the proposed method (Fig. 4).
Conclusion
We have developed an ultrahigh-resolution 1H-MRSI method on a
9.4T animal scanner using subspace-driven acquisition and reconstruction. In
vivo results demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed method in achieving
fast, high-SNR and high-resolution metabolic imaging of the rat brain. With
further validation and integration with spectral quantification, the proposed
method should provide a useful tool for metabolic studies on various animal models.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by NIH-R21EB021013-01 and the Beckman Institute Postdoctoral Fellowship.References
1. Koo V, Hamilton PW, Williamson K. Non-invasive
in vivo imaging in small animal research. Cell Oncol. 2006;28:127-39.
2. Tkac I, Henry PG, Andersen P, Keene CD, Low WC, Gruetter
R. Highly Resolved In Vivo 1H NMR Spectroscopy of the Mouse Brain at 9.4 T.
Magn Reson Med. 2015;52:478-484.
3. Mlynarik V, Kohler I, Gambarota G, Vaslin A,
Clarke PG, Gruetter R. Quantitative proton spectroscopic imaging of the
neurochemical profile in rat brain with microliter resolution at ultra-short
echo times. Magn Reson Med. 2008;59:52-58.
4. Lam F, Ma C, Clifford B, Johnson CL, Liang ZP. High-resolution
1H-MRSI of the brain using SPICE: Data acquisition and image reconstruction.
Magn Reson Med. 2015; In Press.
5. Ma C, Lam F, Johnson CL, Liang ZP. Removal of
nuisance signals from limited and sparse 1H MRSI data using a
union-of-subspaces model. Magn Reson Med. 2015; In Press.
6. Ma C, Lam F, Ning Q, Johnson CL, Liang ZP. High-resolution
1H-MRSI of the brain using short-TE SPICE. ISMRM 2015.