Valentina Pedoia1, Colin Russell1, Allison Randolph V1, Keiko Amano1, Xiaojuan Li1, and Sharmila Majumdar1
1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
Synopsis
MR quantitative T1ρ
mapping has been extensively used to probe articular biochemical changes. While
several studies are still limited to analyzing average T1ρ values, there
is growing interest in the analysis of local patterns of T1ρ maps. A
novel algorithm for locally studying knee relaxation times using Voxel-Based Relaxometry
(VBR) was recently proposed. In this study we propose to couple VBR and Principal
Component Analysis in order to analyze local pattern changes in OA and ACL
patients. Specific features, behind the expected average elevation of T1ρ values, are observed able to distinguish
between OA, ACL and Controls subjects. Introduction
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a
degenerative disease characterized by cartilage thinning and compositional
changes1. Initial signs of cartilage degeneration are molecular and
biochemical changes within the extracellular matrix. MR quantitative T1ρ
mapping has been extensively used to probe early biochemical changes2.
While several studies are still limited to analyzing average T1ρ
values within specific compartments, there is growing interest in the analysis of
spatial distribution and local patterns of T1ρ maps. A novel fully-automatic
and unbiased algorithm for studying knee relaxation times by creating an atlas knee
and using Voxel-Based Relaxometry (VBR) was recently proposed3.
This technique could potentially allow investigation of local cartilage
composition differences between two cohorts through voxel-based Statistical
Parametric Mapping (SPM)3. Moreover, it permits each patient to be
considered as a data-point in a multi-dimensional cloud. Machine learning
techniques, such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA) can be adopted to
extract latent pattern in the data. In this study we propose to couple VBR and
PCA to compare biochemical patterns changes in knees with osteoarthritis and
ACL injury.
Method
180 subjects
from two different cohorts were considered in this study. OA cohort includes 93
osteoarthritic patients (age=54.88±9.1 years, BMI=25.04±3.51 kg/m2, 62 female, KL=1.96) and 25 matched controls (age=51.2±7.72 years, BMI=24.12±3.76 kg/m2, 18 female, KL=0). ACL cohort includes
52 patients with
unilateral ACL tears imaged 6 months after surgical reconstruction (age=28.05±12.1 years, BMI=24.31±2.8 kg/m2, 21 female) and
10 controls (age= 32.01±4 years, BMI=22.8±3.12 kg/m2, 5 female).
All imaging was done using a 3T MRI scanner
(GE Healthcare, Milwaukee,
WI, USA) with an 8-channel phased array knee coil (Invivo Inc, Orlando, FL, USA). Sagittal 3D T1ρ imaging sequences were
obtained with the following parameters: TR/TE=9ms/min
full, FOV=14 cm, matrix=256x128, slice
thickness=4 mm, Views Per Segment=64, time of recovery=1.2 s, spin-lock frequency=500
Hz, ARC phase AF=2, time of spin lock (TSL)=0/10/40/80ms for the ACL cohort and
0/2/4/8/12/20/40/80 ms for the OA cohort. All
images were morphed to the space of a reference using a previously proposed technique3. All the morphed T1ρ maps were converted into voxel-by-voxel
Z-score maps considering the matched age control groups (Figure 1). The values of
Z-score maps were then decomposed using PCA, obtaining twenty orthogonal bases
(Principal Components, PCs) that describe patterns of Z-score spatial
distribution. Each patient’s Z-score map was then projected on those bases,
obtaining similarity scores with each PC. Differences between OA, ACL and control
groups in the PC scores were analyzed using unpaired t-tests. Significance
level was considered as α<0.05.
Results
Figure 1 shows an example
of Z-score conversion from one subject of the OA cohort. Four PCs showed
significant differences between OA and controls (Table 1). OA and ACL subjects
showed a similar pattern in PC1 that is related to the global average Z-score
values. As expected, OA and ACL subjects demonstrated higher Z-scores then
controls (Figure 2). OA subjects also showed significantly higher PC2 values, while
ACL subjects showed significantly lower PC2 values when compared to controls.
The modeling of PC2 proves that higher PC’s values (OA) are related to lower values
in the superficial layer and higher values in the deep layer when compared to the
average subject, with decreasing difference between the two layers. The
relationship for the ACL subjects is inverted (Figure 3).
Discussion and Conclusions
In this study, OA and ACL
subjects are analyzed using PCA-VBR technique. The usage of voxel-based Z-score
mapping was shown to normalize T1ρ maps at the voxel level, respective
to the spatial distribution of control subjects. The PCA analysis reveals that
subjects in both cohorts show higher values of T1ρ Z-score.
Interestingly, PC2 shows how the cartilage layer effect is more emphasized in
ACL patients, consistent with a previous study that reported the superficial
layer as more involved in the early stages of the degeneration4. In
OA subjects, the integrity of the collagen matrix and permeability of fluid of
the layers is compromised, and thus the two layers may show more similar values.
The results of this study suggest that PCA-VBR is a technique that can be used
to analyze biochemical patterns and could, potentially, allow for a more
accurate analysis, disease phenotyping and early stratification of patients after
injury. Further analyses are necessary to better understand the meaning of the
remaining features and other possible applications.
Acknowledgements
This study was possible thanks to the work of the AF-ACL Consortium, funding from Arthritis Foundation, and R01AR046905References
[1]
Mankin HJ at. el., Textbook of Rheumatology. 1993. [2] Li X
at el, Radiology, 15(7) 789-797, 2007, [3] Pedoia et. al. JMRI 2015, [4] Li X at. el. Radiology, 255(2) 505-514, 2011.