Eamon K Doyle, MS1,2, Jonathan M Chia, MS3, and John C Wood, MD, PhD1,2
1Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 3Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH, United States
Synopsis
Estimate of R2* in high-iron patients has many challenges at 3T and above. UTE imaging shows promise as method to perform iron quantitation in heavily iron-loaded tissues. We demonstrate feasibility of using a 3D radial UTE sequence at 3T to estimate R2* relaxation rates in iron-loaded human subjects and fast-decay phantoms.Introduction
MRI has proven to be a useful modality to
noninvasively diagnose and monitor iron overload disorders.[1] R2* (1/T2*) is commonly estimated using a Cartesian
gradient echo scan at 1.5T or 3T. At
1.5T, signal loss limits the dynamic range of liver R2* to liver iron
concentrations (LIC) below 35-40 mg Fe/g dry tissue (henceforth, mg/g), which
prevents iron quantification in severely loaded patients. At 3T, signal loss is
twice as rapid, preventing LIC estimation in half of the clinically relevant
range. UTE (ultrashort echo time) imaging shows promise as a method to image
high-iron patients who demonstrate rapid T2* decay in the liver. We present data demonstrating that a readily
implementable UTE sequence can extend the dynamic range of R2* quantitation at
3T to LIC values exceeding 40 mg/g in patients with iron overload.
Methods
A UTE radial protocol was
performed on a Philips Achieva 3T magnet using the 16-element SENSE Torso XL
coil (R3.2.2, Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands). Six transverse slices
were acquired using a slab-selective UTE excitation followed by a 3D stack-of-stars
radial readout with the following parameters: matrix=88x88, voxel=3.5x3.5x15mm,
TR=4ms, NEX=1, Flip angle=5°, TFE Factor=200, angle density=160%, TE=[0.19,0.23,0.35,0.60, 0.85,1.0,2.0] ms. In human subjects, clinical assessment was performed
on a 1.5T Achieva (SW R3.2.2, Philips) with a SENSE Torso XL coil.
A 3-slice single
gradient echo acquisition was performed with the following parameters: 16
echoes linearly spaced echoes with TE=0.96-11.47ms, FA=30°, matrix=72x67,
voxel=1.25x1.25x10mm, BW=4409Hz/px.
The UTE sequence was tested in
both phantoms and iron-overloaded study participants. The phantom contained vials of
[0,0.50,0.75,1.0,1.5,2.0,2.5,3.5,5.0,8.0,12,16,24] mM manganese chloride in a
0.25 mM MnCl2 bath to simulate a variety of rapid transverse decay
rates. Results were compared to known
transverse decay rates for each concentration. Five human subjects (3M/2F, 7-23
years, 4 β-Thalassemia, 1 other anemia) underwent clinically indicated MR
assessment at 1.5T as well as the free-breathing UTE 3T research protocol as
part of an IRB-approved, NIH-funded study. To facilitate
comparison of R2* values, all fitting of data was performed on magnitude images
using a mono-exponential signal model with manual echo truncation with software
developed in MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA).
Results
Relaxation rate by UTE was linear
with manganese chloride concentration over the entire dynamic range (r2=0.996,
Figure 1). The observed slope of 116.8 Hz/mM is very close to 1.41 times the
empirically determined rate multiplier of 78 Hz/mM, which we have previously measured
at 1.5T. These results closely matched previous unreported R2* estimates in
this phantom at 3T.
Patient results (Figure 2a) also demonstrated linear
correlation when compared to a clinical R2* estimate with an R-squared of
0.9853. The slope nearly matches the
theoretical multiplier of 2 that is expected between 1.5T and 3T R2* estimates
with iron-mediated dephasing.[2] The Bland-Altman analysis (Figure 2b) shows
no significant bias between the two methods over a clinical range of 2-38 mg/g.
Discussion
Using UTE imaging, we have
overcome previous limitations on the dynamic range of iron imaging at 3T. This method will quantify the entire clinical
range of liver iron overload. The
patient data demonstrated a near doubling of R2* compared to 1.5T
estimates. This relationship was
previously shown using a Monte Carlo simulation framework and patient data.[2]
R2* is fundamentally a better contrast for iron
quantification than R2 because R2*-based LIC estimates are not influenced by
B1+ inhomogeneity errors that cause iron overestimates [3] and
are more robust to changes in tissue iron concentration.[4] This
UTE method extends 3T R2* linearity with iron to all achievable iron burdens
using a pulse sequence currently available on existing platforms.
Conclusion
Slab-selective UTE imaging with a
3D SOS radial acquisition shows promise as a technique for clinical R2*
estimation at 3T. The sequence is
expected to reach R2* values of over 4,000 s-1, or over 60 mg/g. Validation of this technique will continue as
part of a patient study to improve iron overload imaging at 3T. We also hope to leverage complex data fitting
to reduce noise bias.
Acknowledgements
This
work is supported by the National Institute of Health, National Institute of
Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Grant R01-DK097115. Clinical science and research support is provided by Philips Healthcare
in kind.References
[1] J. C. Wood, C.
Enriquez, N. Ghugre, J. M. Tyzka, S. Carson, M. D. Nelson, and T. D. Coates,
“MRI R2 and R2* mapping accurately estimates hepatic iron concentration in
transfusion-dependent thalassemia and sickle cell disease patients,” Blood,
vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 1460–1465, Aug. 2005.
[2] N. R. Ghugre, E. K. Doyle, P. Storey, and J. C. Wood,
“Relaxivity-iron calibration in hepatic iron overload: Predictions of a Monte
Carlo model,” Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 879–883, Sep. 2014.
[3] E. K. Doyle and Wood, John C, “Effects of B1+ Inhomogeneity on
Liver Iron Estimates in MRI,” presented at the BMES, Tampa, FL, USA, 2015.
[4] J. C. Wood, P. Zhang, H. Rienhoff, W. Abi-Saab, and E. J.
Neufeld, “Liver MRI is more precise than liver biopsy for assessing total body
iron balance: a comparison of MRI relaxometry with simulated liver biopsy
results,” Magn. Reson. Imaging, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 761–767, Jul. 2015.