David A Feinberg1,2, Alexander Beckett1, An T Vu1,2, and Liyong Chen2
1Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States, 2Advanced MRI Technologies, Sebastopol, CA, United States
Synopsis
The purpose was to develop and
evaluate a novel approach to MR phase imaging of blood flow and CSF flow by
combining cine phase contrast (cine-PC) with simultaneous multi-slice (SMS)
technique to measure velocity in several slice planes simultaneously. Comparisons
were made between SMS 2-4 and conventional single-slice 2D cine-PC GE imaging.
The velocity curves measured in internal carotid (ICA) and vertebral arteries
and jugular veins and aqueductal CSF were similar between SMS and conventional
single-slice cine-PC. In ICA correlations (R=0.92-0.98) in 6 subjects. This new
ability for simultaneous cross-sectional hemodynamic quantification may be
useful for medical diagnoses. Purpose
The most common and available
method for hemodynamic MR velocity imaging on commercial clinical scanners is
2D phase contrast (PC) imaging using a bipolar gradient pulse [1] to encode the
signal phase with velocity in cine gradient echo (GRE) sequences with low flip
angle RF pulses, and cardiac gating (cine-PC) through the cardiac cycle [2,3]. Cine-PC
2D imaging measures flow velocity in a single slice plane and scan time is increased
proportional to the number of repeated slice planes through arteries or CSF
passageways. The purpose of this work is
to develop and evaluate a cine-PC technique with simultaneous multi-slice (SMS)
image acquisition to measure velocity in several slice planes simultaneously.
Methods
A 2D FLASH sequence with cine
acquisition and prospective cardiac gating was modified to excite with
multiband (MB) rf pulses, Fig. 1, and bipolar velocity gradient. Controlled
aliasing [4] with FOV/3 shift was performed with phase cycling the MB pulse,
for 3 slices (0,0,0), (0,120,240), (0,240,120), on the k-space PE axis. Imaging
was performed in 6 normal subjects with both single-slice cine-GRE PC and SMS
cine-GRE PC for blood velocity in 32ch head coil and CSF velocity imaging in
12ch coil. Imaging parameters for cine-PC 2D SMS=1-4 and GRE cine-PC: SMS=1-4,
TR=8.4ms, TE=4.65ms, BW=280 Hz/pixel, FA=15°, IPAT=2, FOV=192×192mm2,
matrix=(128x128) or (256x256), in-plane resolution (res)=(0.75x0.75) or
(1.5x1.5) mm2, venc=80cm/s, with 16mm or 32 mm slice spacing and
slice thickness= 4 mm. Imaging by combining head-neck-spine coil array with head
(12ch), neck (12ch) spine (4ch), was performed with SMS-3, res=1.25mm,
slice=5mm, venc=100 cm/s, TR=9.55ms, TE=5.8ms, FA=15°. The preparation time for
spatial sensitivity data, single band and dummy scans was short, about 180ms. Through
plane velocities were measured with G-venc on G-slice axis, Fig.1. The velocity
phase shifts are positive (white) and negative (black) corresponding to superior
cranial and inferior caudal directions, respectively.
Results
Fig. 1 shows a reduction in
slice cross-talk artifact achieved with use of controlled aliasing as seen by
comparing the averaged phase map of cine-data (arteries-white, vein-black). The total scan time for 2 to 4 slices using
SMS2-SMS4 was 2.2 minutes and similar for conventional single-slice (sms1).
There was no loss in spatial resolution using SMS acquisitions. Figure 2 shows velocity
measurements compared in internal carotid (ICA) and vertebral arteries and
jugular veins, and very similar velocity curves using SMS PC and single-slice
PC. Figure 3A shows comparison of
velocity curves of ICA in 6 subjects
in both scatter plots with correlation coefficients (R) and Bland-Altman plots,
in good agreement. Figures 3B-C show comparison of tSNR and spatial
SNR with little change between SMS-1 (single slice) and SMS-2, and 25% drop in
tSNR in SMS-4, as expected for g-factor image reconstruction noise. Figure 4 shows simultaneous velocity imaging at 3 levels
using SMS-3; the ascending and descending aorta above the heart, shoulder level
and upper neck. Figure 5 shows SMS-2 of velocity in two CSF passageways at
different levels, the aqueduct and foramen magnum.
Discussion
Comparison of different cine
acquisitions was to some degree affected by changes in heart rate between
acquisitions, nevertheless there was high reproducibility between SMS and
non-SMS velocity curves. Simultaneous acquisition of different slice levels eliminates
velocity variability due to changes in heart rate, breathing rate and blood
pressure that can occur between single-slice scans made sequentially at
different levels, and is potentially important for combining dynamic
information at different vessel cross-sections. This improved hemodynamic information from
several regions could be used to derive hemodynamic metrics such as velocity
drops across vessel stenosis or critical flow and sheer patterns in aneurysms. Acquisition
of 3 velocity directions with SMS in the future may be faster than 4D PC
imaging [5] for 3D spatial coverage of vessel lumen and for computational fluid
dynamics analysis of flow.
An
enormous gain in signal encoding efficiency with SMS cine-PC stems from the
fact that there is no inherent SNR loss, as occurs with in-plane parallel
imaging accelerations. Consequently N slices can be acquired in the time of
conventionally acquired single-slice cine-PC without SNR reduction other than
reconstruction noise (g-factor). Hence, these novel SMS velocity phase images
improve SNR efficiency by as much as √N over single slice acquisition with no
spatial resolution or artifact penalties.
Conclusion
The new technique, SMS cine-PC
overcomes scan time limitations in acquiring multiple slices with 2D cine-PC
imaging. Providing several simultaneous cross-sectional measurements of hemodynamics
in vessels or CSF in passageways, SMS cine-PC may have increased utility for medical
diagnosis of hydrocephalus and cardiovascular disease.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Hahn J, Geophys 1960 2. Bryant
et al, JCAT 1984 3. Enzmann et al, AJNR
1993 4. Breuer et al MRM, 2005 5. Markl et al, JMRI 2012