Zixin Deng1,2, Sangeun Lee3, Zhaoyang Fan1, Christopher Nguyen1, Iksung Cho3, Qi Yang1, Xiaoming Bi4, Byoung-Wook Choi5, Jung-Sun Kim3, Daniel Berman1, Hyuk-Jae Chang3, and Debiao Li1
1Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 3Cardiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei Univeristy College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 4R&D, Siemens Healthcare, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 5Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei Univeristy College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Synopsis
Fractional flow reserve is an
invasive diagnostic tool to evaluate the functional significance of a coronary stenosis
by quantifying the pressure gradient (ΔP) across the stenosis. We proposed a
non-invasive technique to derive ΔP using Phase-contrast (PC)-MRI in
conjunction with the Navier-Stokes equations (ΔPMR). Excellent
correlation was observed between derived ΔPMR and measure ΔP from a
pressure transducer in a small caliber phantom model. A significant increase in ΔPMR was seen in the patient
group vs. healthy controls. Preliminary
results suggested that noninvasive quantification of ΔPMR in coronary
arteries is feasible. Purpose
Fractional flow reserve
(FFR) is an invasive procedure evaluating the functional significance of an
intermediate coronary stenosis in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD)
1.
Quantification of pressure gradient (ΔP) across a particular stenosis is the
key to the determination of FFR, where FFR<0.80 is considered a
functionally significant stenosis. Noninvasive ΔP measurement (ΔP
MR)
using phase-contrast (PC)-MRI in conjunction with Navier-Stokes (NS) equations has
been attempted in large to medium sized vessels
2-4. Our previous
work has shown the feasibility of deriving ΔP
MR in small caliber phantom
models and healthy coronary arteries
5-6. To ensure the accuracy of
the proposed method, this study aimed to investigate the reproducibility of ΔP
MR
in stenotic phantom models at various diameters and its correlation with
measured ΔP values via a pressure transducer (ΔP
PT). The feasibility
of the method was investigated in diseased coronary arteries and compared to
healthy controls.
Methods
Phantom studies: 11 phantom models (0%-85% area stenosis, reference diameter=4.8mm)
were individually connected to a flow pump (gadolinium-doped water, constant
volume velocity=250mL/min) while 2D cross-sectional PC-MRI images were
acquired. Contiguous slices (10-20) were consecutively collected across each
narrowing (fig.1a/b). Imaging parameters were: FA=15o; in-plane
resolution=~0.55x0.55mm2; slice thickness=3.2mm; Venc=z(40-260cm/s) and x,y(40-80cm/s), depending on the degree of narrowing. Repeat
scans were performed in 7/11 phantom models. Immediately following the PC-MRI
scans, pressure was measured using an arterial catheter connected to a pressure
transducer before and after the maximum narrowing.
Human studies: 11 healthy controls
(47.3±14.6 years) and 9 patients (67.3±7.3 years, four with known invasive FFR) were
studied. Patient inclusion criteria: known/suspected CAD, ≥1 coronary lesion
(proximal stenosis ≥30%) detected by CTA and/or invasive coronary angiography
(ICA). Coronary PC-MRI acquisitions were
ECG-triggered (mid-diastole) and navigator-gated (end-expiration)5-6. Fat-suppression
pre-pulses were applied to avoid chemical shift effects and increase vessel
contrast7-8. Contiguous slices (4-10) were consecutively collected
across the proximal coronary segment (healthy controls) or stenotic lesion
(patients). Imaging parameters were: Venc=35-65cm/s in all 3
directions, cardiac phase=2(~70ms/phase), in-plane resolution=0.5-0.6x0.5-0.6mm2,
slice thickness=3.2mm and TA=2-4min/slice.
Data Analysis: Eddy-current correction was done offline followed by NS calculations5,6,9
to obtain ΔPMR. Reproducibility of the velocity values
from PC-MRI and the derived ΔPMR of the phantom studies were
assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plot.
Correlation of ΔPMR and ΔPPT was assessed via linear
regression analysis.
Results
Phantom studies: Bland-Altman
plots of peak velocities and ΔPMR are shown in fig.2a. For
velocity measurements, excellent correlation was seen in the through plane peak
velocities (Vz, ICC=0.90) and lower in Vx (ICC=0.57) and Vy (ICC=0.58). For ΔPMRs,
overall ICC=0.87; When observed individually, higher correlation was seen at
smaller stenosis degrees and weaker as stenosis increased (fig.1c). This
could be due to the increased velocity in larger stenoses, causing minor
turbulence distal of the narrowing, thus, inconsistent velocity and ΔPMR
between the two scans. Furthermore, ΔPMR and ΔPPT were
highly correlated (fig.2b). We also observed that as %area stenosis
increased, ΔPMR also increased (fig.2c).
Human studies: A significant (p<0.01) increase in ΔPMR was seen in the
patient group (5.26±3.99mmHg) vs. healthy controls (0.70±0.57mmHg) (fig.3a). CTA/ICA reports in all patients
showed a range of stenoses from 30%-50% at the left main or proximal left
anterior descending coronary artery (pLAD).
ICA/FFR was performed in 4/9 patients where 3/4 had a functionally non-significant
lesion (FFR=0.93±0.70), corroborating with the proposed method (ΔPMR≈3.0±1.70mmHg, low pressure
drop). In one of the four patients
who underwent ICA/FFR, a diffused, 50% lumen narrowing at the pLAD was observed (fig3b-c) with FFR=0.56, suggesting a functionally significant
lesion. The same patient showed a ΔPMR
of ~14mmHg,
likewise suggesting a functionally significant lesion (relatively high pressure
drop).
Discussion
Preliminary results suggest
that noninvasive quantification of ΔP
MR in coronary arteries is
feasible. In phantom studies, excellent correlation was found between the
derived ΔP
MR and measured ΔP
PT.
In human studies, patients with 30-50% stenoses were found to have a higher ΔP
MR than
healthy volunteers. In patients who underwent invasive FFR, high FFR (low
pressure drop) and low FFR (high pressure drop) both corroborated the ΔP
MR results. More patient studies with
invasive FFR comparison are underway to further investigate the sensitivity of
the approach in differentiating between a functionally non-significant and
significant lesion. In addition, further technical improvements in terms of
spatial, temporal resolutions and reduction of noise are also being developed
to further improve the accuracy of the ΔP
MR
calculations.
Conclusion
Our
preliminary studies demonstrated the feasibility of using PC-MRI to measure pressure
gradient across coronary lesions. This approach has the potential to serve as a
gatekeeper for unnecessary invasive catheterization procedures in patients with
coronary artery disease.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.Pijls et al. NEJM1996;
2.Bock et al. MRM2011;
3.Lum et al. RY2007;
4.Bley et al. RY2011;
5.Deng et al. ISMRM2014;
6.Deng et al. SCMR2015;
7.Middione et al, MRM2013;
8.Keegan et al. JCMR2015;
9.Yang et al. MRM1996;