Fluctuations in Functional Connectivity Predict Shifts in Arousal State
Chenhao Wang1, Ju Lynn Ong1, Amiya Patanaik1, Juan Zhou1,2, and Michael W. L. Chee1

1Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorders Program, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, 2Clinical Imaging Research Center, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore

Synopsis

To elucidate relationship between fluctuation in functional connectivity and behavior we estimated dynamic connectivity states (DCS) from task-free fMRI obtained from sleep-deprived healthy young adults. Using spontaneous eye closures as a proxy for vigilance, we identified two DCS that were associated with high and low arousal respectively. DCS exhibiting similar connectivity patterns were also observed when individuals were performing an auditory vigilance task. Dwell time in high or low arousal DCS predicted task performance. Additionally, fluctuations in DCS and task response time were correlated. Fluctuations in functional connectivity appear to be related to spontaneous changes in arousal that affect vigilance.

Purpose

Time varying functional connectivity detected using task-free fMRI exhibits recurring patterns that constitute distinct dynamic connectivity states (DCS)1. Although the range of functional connectivity states is reduced with lowered levels of consciousness2,3, few studies have directly correlated DCS with behavior. Here we used spontaneous eyelid-closures (SEC) on sleep deprived persons as a proxy for vigilance to identify DCSs that correlate with greater and lesser levels of arousal4,5. We then sought to test if spontaneous shifts into high or low arousal DCS would correspond to behavior during a vigilance task.

Methods

Young adults underwent task-free fMRI scans as well as scans performed during an auditory vigilance task after being kept awake for ~24 hours. Video recordings of the eyes during task-free scans were assigned scores ranging from 1-closed to 9-open. Whole-brain dynamic functional connectivity between 126 predefined regions6 in task-free fMRI were estimated using 40s wide, sliding-window correlation, shifted in steps of 1 TR (2 sec). This was followed by K-means clustering to estimate centroids of DCSs. We then correlated the occurrence probability of each DCS with the concurrent SEC ratings to identify if any of them were associated with SEC changes. DCSs derived from task fMRI were estimated using an identical approach and were matched to their task-free fMRI counterparts. Matched DCSs were used to predict task performance.

Results

From the 9 DCSs estimated from task-free fMRI, we identified 2 extreme DCS (Figure 1). At one extreme was a DCS corresponding to a state of low arousal with high likelihood of behavioral lapses (associated with closed eyelids). At the other extreme was a DCS corresponding to a state of high arousal (associated with wide open eyelids) characterized by increased intra-network connectivity involving default mode, control, attention and salience networks, and increased anti-correlations between default mode and attention networks. The high and low arousal task-related DCSs were highly similar in configuration to their task-free counterparts. Participants who spent more time in the high arousal DCS had fewer behavioral lapses (rho = -0.548, p = 0.003), whereas more time in the low arousal DCS predicted a higher lapse rate (rho = 0.465, p = 0.022). The fluctuation between high and low arousal DCSs correlated with fluctuation in response times.

Discussion and Conclusion

Functional connectivity during periods of high arousal (proxied by way of eyelid opening) is characterized by elevated levels of intra- and inter-network connectivity and anti-correlation between networks that have been shown to be crucial in management of attentional resources, detection of salient stimuli and coordination of externally and internally oriented cognitive processes7-9. The distinct patterns between high and low arousal DCSs resemble functional connectivity changes reported in sleep deprived subjects10-12. We demonstrate that a significant behavioral accompaniment of fluctuating functional connectivity is fluctuation in arousal that is in turn accompanied by eyelid closure and slower responding.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by grants from National Medical Research Council, Singapore (NMRC/STaR/0004/2008 and NMRC/STaR/0015/2013) awarded to Micheal W. L. Chee and the Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore (block grant) awarded to Juan Zhou.

References

1. Allen EA, Damaraju E, Plis SM, Erhardt EB, Eichele T, Calhoun VD. Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. Cerebral cortex Mar 2014;24(3):663-676.

2. Tagliazucchi E, Laufs H. Decoding wakefulness levels from typical fMRI resting-state data reveals reliable drifts between wakefulness and sleep. Neuron May 7 2014;82(3):695-708.

3. Barttfeld P, Uhrig L, Sitt JD, Sigman M, Jarraya B, Dehaene S. Signature of consciousness in the dynamics of resting-state brain activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Jan 20 2015;112(3):887-892.

4. David F. Dinges GM, John Walker Powell, Malissa M. Mallis. Evaluation of Techniques for Ocular Measurement as an Index of Fatigue and the Basis for Alertness Management. US Department of Transportation 1998.

5. Ong JL, Asplund CL, Chia TT, Chee MW. Now you hear me, now you don't: eyelid closures as an indicator of auditory task disengagement. Sleep Dec 2013;36(12):1867-1874.

6. Yeo BT, Krienen FM, Sepulcre J, et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol Sep 2011;106(3):1125-1165.

7. Seeley WW, Menon V, Schatzberg AF, Keller J, Glover GH, Kenna H, Reiss AL, Greicius MD. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J Neurosci Feb 28 2007;27(9):2349-2356.

8. Gusnard DA, Akbudak E, Shulman GL, Raichle ME. Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: relation to a default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Mar 27 2001;98(7):4259-4264.

9. Vossel S, Geng JJ, Fink GR. Dorsal and ventral attention systems: distinct neural circuits but collaborative roles. The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry Apr 2014;20(2):150-159.

10. Samann PG, Tully C, Spoormaker VI, Wetter TC, Holsboer F, Wehrle R, Czisch M. Increased sleep pressure reduces resting state functional connectivity. Magma Dec 2010;23(5-6):375-389.

11. De Havas JA, Parimal S, Soon CS, Chee MW. Sleep deprivation reduces default mode network connectivity and anti-correlation during rest and task performance. Neuroimage Jan 16 2012;59(2):1745-1751.

12. Yeo BT, Tandi J, Chee MW. Functional connectivity during rested wakefulness predicts vulnerability to sleep deprivation. Neuroimage Feb 17 2015;111:147-158.

Figures

Spontaneous eyelid closure (SEC) associated dynamic connectivity states (DCS) during the task-free condition. Functional connectivity matrices (top row) and distribution of state occurrence (bottom row) of the two DCSs that were associated with reduced (left panel) and increased (right panel) SEC respectively. The matrices indicate Pearson’s correlation values between 126 predefined regions of interest.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0316