Shu Zhang1, Robert E Lenkinski1,2, and Elena Vinogradov1,2
1Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 2Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
Synopsis
Recently
properties of bSSFP were explored to detect exchange processes (bSSFPX),
similar to CEST or off-resonance T1ρ experiments.
We expand the study and implement a transient bSSFPX experiment that acquires
bSSFP spectra continuously as the effective saturation time increases, allowing
observation of the approach of magnetization to the steady state in a single
shot. The magnetization dynamic is governed by the effective field and
relaxation times parallel or perpendicular to it. Work is in progress to derive an exact
quantification model. The method leads to fast acquisition of time-dependent
data and may speed up QUEST-like quantification of the exchange processes.Introduction
Chemical
exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and the closely related off-resonance T1ρ methods are gaining popularity. However, quantitative CEST/T1ρ imaging can be time consuming since the experimental repetition with different
saturation lengths/powers is needed. Recently, a new way to acquire CEST/T1ρ data was proposed1 based on the exchange-sensitive
properties of balanced steady state free precession sequence (bSSFPX).
The
bSSFP (or TrueFISP) is a versatile sequence2-4.
The bSSFP sequence can be viewed as generating an effective off-resonance field
analogous to CW and possessing similar spin-lock and saturation properties1,5. In the previous study, the effective field
approach was derived and proof-of-concept was demonstrated in steady-state
conditions. Here, we implement the transient bSSFPX. The sequence has features
similar to Look-Locker6 and
IR-TrueFISP7. However, the current
sequence does not require any additional preparation pulses and specifically focuses
on saturation and off-resonance effects. The motivation is to acquire the
transient information in a single shot, thus paving the way to fast, quantitative
CEST/T1ρ imaging.
Methods
All of
the experiments were performed on a 3T MRI scanner (Ingenia, Philips Healthcare)
using a 15-channel head-spine coil at room temperature. The pulse program was
modified to acquire images continuously during the preparation echoes in a
standard bSSFP sequence as shown in Fig.1. Thus the sequence acquires all, transient
and steady-state images. Note that the bSSPFX acquires an XY-spectrum and not a
Z-spectrum. The transient bSSFPX sequence was tested in two phantoms (i) 2%
agar with 0.14 mM gadolinium and (ii) 10, 50 and 100 mM choline water solutions.
The imaging parameters were TR/TE=2.0/1.0 ms, voxel size=3*3*8 mm, FA=40
o,
half alpha startup echoes. 51 points in the XY-spectrum
1 were acquired at the frequency range ±500 Hz. 20
images (corresponding to different saturation times) were acquired at each
off-resonance frequency. Since the number of phase encoding lines was 73 and the
linear ordering was used, the effective saturation time for the
i
th image t
sat=[37+(i-1)*73]*TR. Images were processed on a
pixel-by-pixel basis using custom Matlab routines. The B
0 inhomogeneities and drifts were
corrected using a procedure similar to the one described in Ref.11. MTR
asym was calculated and normalized to the upfield side of the XY-spectrum.
Results and
Discussions
The
evolution of the transient signal is governed by the relaxation times T1ρ
and T2ρ, parallel and perpendicular to the effective field,
respectively8 and by the precession
frequency around the effective field1.
Similar to the CW case, both relaxation times depend on the off-resonance value
as well as on the flip angle1,8,9 and
contain exchange contributions.
Fig.2a
shows the evolution of agar XY-spectra from the transient state (lighter) into
the steady state (darker) as the effective saturation time increases. In Fig.2b,
the signals at +1.2 and -1.2 ppm are plotted against tsat. The
signals decay exponentially with T1ρ as they approach the steady-state.
Agar has no exchanging moieties, hence its
steady-state bSSFP profile is symmetric around water and the steady-state
signals are similar for both frequencies. Moreover, the measured T1ρ
at +1.2 and -1.2 ppm are similar (360±30 and 420±20 ms, respectively). Since
the intrinsic T2 in agar is short, the signal is largely governed by
the T1ρ decay and no transient oscillations were observed.
Fig.3 shows the 10 and 100 mM choline XY-spectra against effective
saturation time. The T1 and T2 of the aqueous solutions
are very long and prominent transient oscillations and spurious effects are
observed, especially at the earlier time points. However, as the saturation
time increases the profiles approach steady-state values. The steady-state profiles
are asymmetric around water due to chemical exchange at ~1 ppm downfield (Fig.3b,
arrow). The MTRasym (1 ppm) also approaches its steady state values
of ~2%, 10% and 16% for 10, 50 and 100 mM respectively (Fig.4). After initial
transient oscillations (asterisks in Fig.4) the MTRasym demonstrates
exponential growth similar to QUEST curves10.
Some residual oscillations due to transient effects or experimental
imperfections are still observed. As shown in Fig.1, the acquisition is effectively
performed during the saturation; hence one “shot” of the transient bSSFPX
sequence acquires sufficient data for T1ρ and/or exchange rate
quantification, which may largely speed up the quantification process. The T1ρ
and, potentially, the exchange rate could be then obtained by fitting the
curves (Fig.2b or Fig.4).
Conclusion
We
have presented experimental implementation of transient bSSFPX measurements,
aimed at the single-shot quantitative CEST/T
1ρ measurements. The
sequence has a potential to quickly acquire quantitative information. Work is
in progress setting up an analytical model for the signal evolution and extracting
quantitative information (i.e. exchange rate) from the profiles.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Zhang S, et al. Proc ISMRM 2015; 23:0785.
[2] Bieri O, et al. MRM 2007; 58:511-518.
[3] Hargreaves BA, et al. MRI 2006; 24:113-122.
[4] Deoni SCL, et al. JMRI 2008; 27:1421-1429.
[5] Mehring M. Principles of High Resolution NMR in Solids,
1983.
[6] Henderson E, et al. MRI 1999; 17:1163-1171.
[7] Scheffler K, et al. MRM 2001; 45:720-723.
[8] Ganter C. MRM 2004; 52:368-375.
[9] Trott O, et al. JMR 2002; 154:157-160.
[10] McMahon MT, et al. MRM
2006; 55:836-847.
[11] Miller K. MRM 2010;
63:385-395.