Suhyung Park1, Sugil Kim1,2, and Jaeseok Park3
1Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Suwon, Korea, Republic of, 2Department of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea, Republic of
Synopsis
Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging has been introduced as a new contrast mechanism for molecular imaging, and typically requires long saturation preparation and multiple acquisitions of imaging data with varying saturation frequencies (called z-spectrum). Since the z-spectrum acquisition is inherently slow and takes prohibitively long imaging time, it has been very difficult to introduce CEST z-spectrum into a clinical routine. In this work, we propose a novel, simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) Spiral CEST encoding with Hankel subspace learning (HSL) for ultrafast whole-brain z-spectrum acquisition within 2-3 minutes, in which: 1) RF segmented uneven saturation is employed to reduce the duration of saturation preparation, 2) Spiral CEST encoding is employed to acquire SMS signals, and 3) SMS signals are projected onto the subspace spanned by the complementary null space, selectively reconstructing a slice of interest while nulling the other slice signals. Introduction
Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST)
imaging has been introduced as a new contrast mechanism for molecular imaging,
and typically requires long saturation preparation and multiple acquisitions of
imaging data with varying saturation frequencies (called z-spectrum)
1,2. Since the
z-spectrum acquisition is inherently slow and takes prohibitively long imaging
time, it has been very difficult to introduce CEST z-spectrum into a clinical
routine. In this work, we propose a novel, simultaneous multi-slice (SMS)
Spiral CEST encoding with Hankel subspace learning (HSL)
3,4 for ultrafast
whole-brain z-spectrum acquisition within 2-3 minutes, in which: 1) RF
segmented uneven saturation is employed to reduce the duration of saturation
preparation
5, 2) Spiral CEST encoding is employed to acquire SMS signals, and 3)
SMS signals are projected onto the subspace spanned by the complementary null
space, selectively reconstructing a slice of interest while nulling the other
slices.
Methods
1) SMS-HSL Reconstruction: The proposed SMS scheme models the SMS Hankel-structured matrix as the linear
superposition of Hankel matrices of all excited slices $$$\bf{N_s}$$$ :
$$\bf{\mathcal{H}\left ( y\right ) = \sum_{m=1}^{N_s} \mathcal{H}\left ( x_m \right ) + N}$$
where $$$\bf{\mathcal{H}\left (\cdot\right )}$$$ is the Hankel
operator, $$$\bf{y}$$$ is the measured SMS signals in k-space, $$$\bf{x_m}$$$ is the
desired k-space at the mth slice, and $$$\bf{N}$$$ is the additive noises. To selectively
estimate the slice of interest while nulling the other slices, Hankel composite
matrix is constructed by combining all slices other than a slice of interest $$$\bf{\mathcal{H}\left ( x_s^c \right ) = \sum_{m=1}^{N_s} \mathcal{H}\left ( x_m \right ) - \mathcal{H}\left ( x_s \right )}$$$, and the
complementary null space $$$\bf{\mathcal{N}_s^c}$$$ is then learned
taking right singular vectors corresponding to small singular values below a
certain value following SVD (Fig. 1). By
projecting $$$\bf{\mathcal{H}\left ( y \right )}$$$ onto the
subspace spanned by $$$\bf{\mathcal{N}_s^c}$$$, the slice of interest $$$\bf{\mathcal{H}\left ( x_s \right )}$$$ can be
well-separated from $$$\bf{\mathcal{H}\left ( y \right )}$$$ suppressing most of the contribution
of $$$\bf{\mathcal{H}\left ( x_s^c \right )}$$$ while holding the signal components of $$$\bf{\mathcal{H}\left ( x_s \right )}$$$ intact:
$$\bf{\mathcal{H}\left ( y \right )\mathcal{N}_s^c=\mathcal{H}\left ( x_s \right )\mathcal{N}_s^c}$$
Exploiting the facts that $$$\bf{\mathcal{H}\left ( x_s^c \right )}$$$ has a non-empty null space and $$$\bf{\mathcal{H}\left ( x_s \right )}$$$ is highly rank-deficient (Fig. 1), the reconstruction is posed as an optimization problem
by simultaneously imposing null projection and low-rank prior with data consistency:
$$\bf{\hat{x}_s = \underset{x_s}{min} \ \ \frac{1}{2}\left \| \mathcal{H}\left ( y\right ) - \sum_{m=1}^{N_s} \mathcal{H}\left ( x_m \right ) \right \|_F^2 + \frac{\lambda_N}{2}\left \| \left ( \mathcal{H}\left ( y \right ) - \mathcal{H}\left ( x_s \right ) \right ) \mathcal{N}_s^c \right \|_ F^2 + \lambda_L \left \| \mathcal{H}\left ( x_s \right ) \right \|_*}$$
where $$$\bf{\lambda_N}$$$ and $$$\bf{\lambda_L}$$$ are regularization
parameters. The complementary null spaces are estimated from CEST reference
scan, and the optimization is solved using variable
splitting method by alternating between well-defined sub-problems.
2) Experimental Evaluation: To
test the feasibility of the SMS-HSL in accelerating CEST imaging, we performed the
SMS acquisition on a 2D whole-brain spiral CEST datasets with RF-segmented
uneven irradiation. The CEST sequence consists of two saturation pulses, each
of which lasted 3sec and 0.5sec, respectively. All images were acquired with
a spatial matrix 64x64 using a single-shot spiral trajectory through 32receiver coils, and 21different offset were performed varying from -5 to 5ppm
with a frequency interval of 0.5ppm. The total scan time for acquiring
whole-brain with 30slices was 7min 50sec, and the reference scan was
performed without saturation pulse for CEST normalization and SMS calibration. The proposed SMS-HSL reconstruction was compared with Split slice-GRAPPA (SP-SG) as a competing method.
Results and Discussions
Fig. 2 shows the five sets of brain images with CEST
labeling frequency of 3.5ppm, and the image was reconstructed using SP-SG and
SMS-HSL, respectively, when an MB factor is set to 5. The SP-SG suffers from severe amplified
noises over the entire images while the SMS-HSL relatively reduces artifacts
leading to robust reconstruction of brain structures. Fig. 3 compares the corresponding
z-spectrum reconstructed using fully sampled standard CEST data, SP-SG, and
SMS-HSL for white and gray matter regions, respectively. It is observed that SP-SG results
in larger deviation of the reconstructed z-spectrum from the standard MT
signals while SMS-HSL remains close to the standard MT signals in both white
and grey matter regions.
Conclusions
We successfully
demonstrated that the proposed, spiral CEST encoding with SMS-HSL can produce
ultrafast whole-brain z-spectra within 2-3minutes (clinically feasible imaging
time) without apparent loss of SNR. It is expected that the proposed method may
introduce CEST z-spectrum acquisition into a clinical routine in the
future.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by IBS-R015-D1.References
1. Ward KM, Aletras AH, Balaban RS. A new class of contrast agents for
MRI based on chemical exchange using saturation transfer. J Magn Res
2000;143(1):79–87.
2.van Zijl P, Yadav N. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): what is in a name and what isn't? Magn Reson Med 2011; 65: 927–948.
3. Uecker M, Lai P, Murphy MJ, Virtue P, Elad M, Pauly JM, Vasanawala SS, Lustig M. ESPIRiT-an eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: where SENSE meets GRAPPA. Magn Reson Med 2014;71:990–1001.
4. Zhang J, Liu C, Moseley ME. Parallel reconstruction using null operations. Magn Reson Med 2011;66:1241–1253.
5. Sun PZ, Cheung JS, Wang E, Benner T, Sorensen AG. Fast multislice pH-weighted chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI with unevenly segmented RF irradiation. Magn Reson Med 2011; 65(2): 588–594.