Low Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Correlate with Enhancing Mitosis and Cell Proliferation Expression in glioblastoma using Locus-Specific Radiogenomic Map
Cheng-Yu Chen1,2,3, Fei-Ting Hsu1, Hua-Shan Liu1,4, Ping-Huei Tsai1,3, Chia-Feng Lu2,3,5, Yu-Chieh Kao2,3, Li-Chun Hsieh1, and Pen-Yuan Liao1

1Department of Medical Image, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, 2Translational Imaging Research Center, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, 3Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, 4Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, 5Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan

Synopsis

A new approach to unravel the genomic expression of glioblastoma by advanced MR imaging technique has recently been introduced to improve the prognostic and predictive efficacies of neuroimaging. This imaging method is potentially a valuable tool to link individual differences in the human genome to structure, function and physiology into brain disease, a method referred to as radiogenomics. In this study, we established locus specific radiogenomic map based on MR imaging and Microarray RNA analysis. Our results revealed that apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) differences were correlated with several biological processes change, including cell proliferation, T cell immunity, immune response, and mitosis. The identification of tumor genotypes by imaging phenotypes will open a new era of therapeutic strategy in high grade gliomas.

Purpose

Glioblastoma (GBM; WHO grade IV astrocytoma) is the most common malignant and heterogeneity primary brain tumor. Recently, advanced MR neuroimaging has shown its promising values in quantifying tumor heterogeneity from the perspectives of blood-brain barrier disruption, tumor angiogenesis, cellularity, and metabolism. Radiogenomic studies reveal that the imaging phenotypes can be correlated to the underlying genomic and molecular pathways in heterogeneous GBM. Accordingly, combined microarray data with MR neuroimaging of GBM may develop a new method that leverages and integrates large datasets to provide an approach for predictive and prognostic biomarkers, and therefore embodies the precision medicine in personalized therapies. In this study, we aim to establish a locus specific radiogenomic map based on advance MR image and RNA microarray. We focus on the correlation between ADC images and several molecular mechanisms, such as cell proliferation (epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR), mitosis (Cyclin-dependent kinases family, CDK) and immune response (C-C chemokine receptors family, CCR)1.

Methods

Patients and Samples: To study the tumor heterogeneity, 9 locus-specific primary GBM tissue samples from four different patients for enhancing (A), infiltrative (B), and necrotic tumor (C) portions were extracted by MR-guided stereotaxic surgery at Taipei Medical University Hospital. Patients were all conducted in compliance with IRB approvals and informed consents were obtained.

RNA extract and Microarray assay: RNA from stereotactic surgical specimens were isolated by mirVana miRNA kit, and the quality of the extracted RNA were evaluated with the RNA 6000 Nano LabChip on the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Five hundred nanograms of total RNA were amplified and labeled by Agilent Quick Amp Labeling Kit and analysis by One-color Agilent 60-mer Whole Human Genome Array Kit. The signal intensities were corrected for the background intensities with the normexp method, followed by the quantile normalization across arrays with the limma software2. The reported microarray data were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo).

Conventional MR image: Pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted, T2-weighted and fast low-angle shot MR imaging were obtained using a 1.5T MR unit (HDx, GE).

Diffusion-weighted image: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was acquired for each patient with the following parameters: FOV=240×240 mm2, matrix=256×256 pixels, 23 contiguous slices, slice thickness/gap=5.0/1.0 mm, TR/TE=7000/82.2 ms, number of excitation=2, and a maximal b of 1,000 s/mm2 . The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map was then calculated from DWI. ROI were selected manually and image ratio was analyzed by OLEA SPHERE™.

Gene Ontology (GO): GO analyses were executed using The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID)3. For each GO term4, the p-value of function clustering and the p-value following multiple detecting correction, such as Benjamini correction or false discovery rate (FDR) correction, were calculated in DAVID.

Results

Experimental flow chart of this study was showed as figure 1. In figure 2, locus specific MR guide biopsies were showed. Using correlation coefficient analysis, overexpression of T cell activation genes such as CD4 and CD8a were found in the low-ADC site, namely, the enhancing tumor regions (Figure 3). Moreover, the regional ADC also exhibited negative correlations with cell proliferation and mitosis-related genes (Figure 3). We found that EGFR and CCR5, which plays role in cell proliferation and immune response, were be down-regulated in high ADC region. Mapping of MR ADC image with GO_biological process was defined as figure 4.

Discussion

A previous study by Diehn et al. showed discrepant gene expression within the tumor of different spatial loci by the integrated functional genomic datasets and MR imaging5. However, whether physiological MR imaging can predict genetic expression patterns within a heterogeneous tumor remains unclear. Here, our preliminary results show that ADC cellularity map may provide a new insight into tumor progression-related mechanism, such as down-regulation of T cell immune response and over-expression of mitosis and cancer cell proliferation. A further study on the immune-mediated mechanism may improve our understanding of the physiological MR imaging and its relevance to genetic-modulated tumor behavior.

Conclusion

Our results imply that ADC ratio difference within a heterogeneous GBM can be controlled by various molecular mechanisms during tumor progression. This may suggest that MR radiogenomic map may improve our understanding of the treatment strategy design.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 104-2314-B-038-051-MY3),Taipei Medical University Hospital (104TMU-TMUH-23, 104TMUH-SP-02), and Health and Welfare Surcharge of Tobacco Products supported for Comprehensive Cancer Center of Taipei Medical University (MOHW104-TDU-B-212-124-001), Taipei, Taiwan.

References

1. Kien P, Defang LC, and Jeffrey KH. CCL5, CCR1 and CCR5 in murine glioblastoma: immune cell infiltration and survival rates are not dependent on individual expression of either CCR1 or CCR5. J Neuroimmunol. 2012;246(1-2): 10–17.

2. Ritchie ME, Silver J, Oshlack A, et al. A comparison of background correction methods for two-colour microarrays. Bioinformatics.2007;23(20):2700–2707.

3. Dennis G Jr, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, et al: DAVID: database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery. Genome Biol. 2003;4:P32003.

4. Kanehisa M: The KEGG database. Novartis Found Symp. 2002;247:91–103. 119–128. 244–252.

5. Diehn M, Nardini C, Wang DS, et al. Identification of noninvasive imaging surrogates for brain tumor gene-expression modules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(13):5213–5218.

Figures

Figure 1. Experimental flow chart of developing GBM Radiogenomic map.

Figure 2. This figure displaying the crosshairs in contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging for stereotactic biopsy loci from four GBM patients.

Figure 3. Total nine samples were used for ADC image and microarray correlation coefficient. P-value <+ 0.05 was defined as positive regulation, vice versa. The genes which showed correlations with ADC images were further calculated by DAVID system, followed by grouping and annotating by Gene ontology system.

Figure 4. MR Radiogenomics: Newest Member of ‘’omic’’ family. ADC was found to be correlated to several biological processes in glioblastoma.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0290