Determination of Parameters Variation in DTI, BOLD, and ASL MRI for Transplanted Kidneys
Maryam Seif1, Laila Yasmin Mani2, Chris Boesch1, Bruno Vogt2, and Peter Vermathen1

1Depts. Radiology and Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 2Dept. Nephrology, Hypertension and Clinical Pharmacology, Hospital University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Synopsis

DTI, BOLD and ASL MRI techniques have gained acceptance to evaluate different physiological aspects of the renal function both in research and clinics. However, there are not yet sufficient studies available investigating the accuracy and repeatability of renal MRI techniques. The main aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the reproducibility of DTI, BOLD MRI and ASL parameters derived from two scans and to investigate whether there are significant correlations between renal parameters obtained from these MR techniques in transplanted kidneys.

Introduction

Early detection of functional changes in transplanted kidneys can play an important role in investigating renal impairments and initiating accurate treatments. In recent years, there have been several studies in native and transplanted kidneys investigating the impact of the functional MRI methods (DTI, BOLD, & ASL MRI) for the assessment of renal function (1-9). However, there are only a few studies investigating the accuracy and repeatability of functional MRI techniques in transplanted kidneys, especially applying several methods in concert. The main aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the reproducibility of DTI, BOLD, and ASL MRI parameters derived from two scans in transplanted kidneys. A secondary aim was to investigate whether there are significant correlations between renal parameters obtained from these three functional MRI methods in transplanted kidneys.

Materials and Methods

DTI, BOLD, and ASL MRI were performed in 12 renal allografts with normal kidney function (47.3±14.4 years) using 3T MR scanners (Verio, Trio, Siemens). Renal allografts were scanned two times with the same protocol, back-to-back with 30 minutes break. A DW single shot echo-planar measurement was performed without triggering in transplanted kidneys with ten different b-values (0-700s/mm2) and (acquisition number=2, TR=3300ms, TE=56ms, slice-thickness=5mm, Matrix=192x192, FOV=300x300mm2). BOLD MRI was performed in a single breathold of 17 seconds per slice with 12 echoes (6-52.3ms) and following parameters: TR=65ms, FOV=400x400mm2, Matrix=256x256, slice-thickness=5mm. The FAIR true fast imaging with steady state precession (True-FISP) ASL (10) was performed in coronal orientation with following parameters: TR=4.0ms, TE=2.0ms, slice-thickness=7mm, Matrix=128x128, FOV=350x350mm2, TI=1200ms, T1=1150ms. All data were analyzed using in-house custom scripts written in IDL and MATLAB. DTI yielded ADC, fractional anisotropy (FA) and perfusion fraction (FP). BOLD MRI yielded the relaxation rate R2* and ASL yielded perfusion values. To assess reproducibility, coefficients of variations within (CVw) and between (CVb) subjects were calculated and presented in percent of the mean. Pearson linear regression method was used to assess correlations between parameters.

Results

DTI and BOLD MRI measurements were successfully completed in 10 out of 12 patients and ASL measurements were completed in 9 subjects. One patient was excluded due to polycystic kidney disease. The CVw for medullary and cortical ADC were 2.5% and 2.9%, respectively and the CVb for medullary and cortical ADC were 4.2%, and 6.1%, respectively. The variations were higher for FA (<28%) as well as for FP, especially between subjects, CVb (<35%, Table 1). The CVw for R2* in medulla and cortex were 6.5% and 6.9%, respectively, while the CVb for R2* were clearly higher (in medulla: 16.6%; in cortex: 14.4%). The CVw and CVb of perfusion results obtained from ASL in cortex were 9.3% and 10.0%, respectively and in medulla 16.2% and 35.5%, respectively. Figures 1 & 2 show that the values of the second scans for each subject are close to those obtained from the same subject in the first scans. There were no significant correlations between R2* and diffusion parameters. Similarly, the correlation between R2* and perfusion values calculated from ASL was not found significant and no significant correlations were found between diffusion parameters and perfusion.

Discussion and Conclusion

High reproducibility was obtained for most parameters derived from DTI, BOLD and ASL scans. FA showed lower variance in medulla than in cortex. The high variance for FP is in concordance with the high variance between subjects found in the other studies. FP values are lower than reported before (6,11), which may be due to shorter TE used in the present study and improved signal stability. The cortical perfusion derived in ASL showed low variance between and within subjects. However, medullary perfusion showed greater variation than cortical perfusion. Low reproducibility in medullary perfusion has been reported before (7). This increased variability in medulla is most likely due to the lower SNR as compared to the cortex. ASL signal is directly proportional to blood flow, and medullary perfusion is much lower than cortical perfusion (7). There were no significant correlations between renal perfusion and the other parameters obtained from DTI and BOLD MRI. This is in contrast to another study showing a significant correlation between perfusion in ASL and FP in DTI for transplanted kidney (11). In conclusion, our results suggest that DTI, BOLD MRI, and ASL techniques provide reproducible results for different parameters reflecting renal function. The clearly lower CVw for some parameters suggest performing longitudinal studies instead of cross-sectional studies if possible. No significant correlations between parameters in different methods indicate that these techniques may yield complementary information in transplanted kidneys. These measurements build the basis for planning future clinical studies.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) grant #31003A-132935

References

1. Eisenberger U, Binser T, Thoeny H, Boesch C, Frey FJ, Vermathen M. Living Renal Allograft Transplantation: Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging in Longitudinal Follow-up of the Donated and the Remaining Kidney. Radiology 2014;270:800-808.

2. Prasad PV, Thacker J, Li LP, et al. Multi-Parametric Evaluation of Chronic Kidney Disease by MRI: A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0139661.

3. Lanzman RS, Ljimani A, Pentang G, et al. Kidney transplant: functional assessment with diffusion-tensor MR imaging at 3T. Radiology 2013;266:218-225.

4. Lanzman RS, Wittsack HJ, Martirosian P, et al. Quantification of renal allograft perfusion using arterial spin labeling MRI: initial results. Eur Radiol 2010;20:1485-1491.

5. Artz NS, Sadowski EA, Wentland AL, et al. Reproducibility of renal perfusion MR imaging in native and transplanted kidneys using non-contrast arterial spin labeling. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:1414-1421.

6. Thoeny HC, Zumstein D, Simon-Zoula S, et al. Functional evaluation of transplanted kidneys with diffusion-weighted and BOLD MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2006;241:812-821.

7. Heusch P, Wittsack HJ, Blondin D, et al. Functional evaluation of transplanted kidneys using arterial spin labeling MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;40:84-89.

8. Heusch P, Wittsack HJ, Pentang G, et al. Biexponential analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging: comparison of three different calculation methods in transplanted kidneys. Acta Radiol 2013;54:1210-1217.

9. Cutajar M, Hilton R, Olsburgh J, et al. Renal blood flow using arterial spin labelling MRI and calculated filtration fraction in healthy adult kidney donors Pre-nephrectomy and post-nephrectomy. Eur Radiol 2015;25:2390-2396.

10. Martirosian P, Klose U, Mader I, Schick F. FAIR true-FISP perfusion imaging of the kidneys. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:353-361.

11. Heusch P, Wittsack HJ, Heusner T, et al. Correlation of biexponential diffusion parameters with arterial spin-labeling perfusion MRI: results in transplanted kidneys. Invest Radiol 2013;48:140-144.

Figures

Figure 1: Correlation between mean diffusion parameters in DTI (a, b, c) determined in the first scans versus those from the second scans in medulla and cortex of renal allografts. (Dashed lines represent unity)

Figure 2: Correlation between mean R2* in BOLD MRI and perfusion in ASL MRI (a, b) determined in the first scans versus those from the second scans in medulla and cortex of renal allografts. (Dashed lines represent unity)

Table 1: CVw and CVb for diffusion, BOLD and ASL parameters calculated from two scans in transplanted kidneys. (Data are given in percent of the mean value)



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0270