Synopsis
DTI, BOLD and ASL MRI
techniques have gained acceptance to evaluate different physiological aspects
of the renal function both in research and clinics. However, there are not yet sufficient
studies available investigating the accuracy and repeatability of renal MRI
techniques. The main aim of this study
was therefore to evaluate the reproducibility of DTI, BOLD MRI and ASL
parameters derived from two scans and to investigate whether there are significant correlations between renal parameters obtained from these MR techniques in
transplanted kidneys.Introduction
Early detection of functional changes in
transplanted kidneys can play an important role in investigating renal
impairments and initiating accurate treatments. In recent years, there have
been several studies in native and transplanted kidneys investigating the
impact of the functional MRI methods (DTI, BOLD, & ASL MRI) for the
assessment of renal function (1-9). However, there are only a few studies investigating
the accuracy and repeatability of functional MRI techniques in transplanted
kidneys, especially applying several methods in concert. The main aim of this
study was therefore to evaluate the reproducibility of DTI, BOLD, and ASL MRI
parameters derived from two scans in transplanted kidneys. A secondary aim was
to investigate whether there are significant correlations between renal
parameters obtained from these three functional MRI methods in transplanted
kidneys.
Materials and Methods
DTI, BOLD, and ASL MRI were performed in
12 renal allografts with normal kidney function (47.3±14.4 years) using 3T MR scanners (Verio, Trio, Siemens). Renal allografts were scanned two times with the same protocol,
back-to-back with 30 minutes break. A DW single shot echo-planar measurement
was performed without triggering in transplanted kidneys with ten different
b-values (0-700s/mm2) and (acquisition number=2, TR=3300ms, TE=56ms,
slice-thickness=5mm, Matrix=192x192, FOV=300x300mm2). BOLD MRI was
performed in a single breathold of 17 seconds per slice with 12 echoes
(6-52.3ms) and following parameters: TR=65ms, FOV=400x400mm2,
Matrix=256x256, slice-thickness=5mm. The FAIR true fast imaging with steady
state precession (True-FISP) ASL (10) was
performed in coronal orientation with following parameters: TR=4.0ms, TE=2.0ms,
slice-thickness=7mm, Matrix=128x128, FOV=350x350mm2, TI=1200ms,
T1=1150ms. All data were analyzed using in-house custom scripts written in IDL and MATLAB. DTI yielded ADC, fractional
anisotropy (FA) and perfusion fraction (FP). BOLD MRI yielded the
relaxation rate R2* and ASL yielded perfusion values.
To assess reproducibility, coefficients
of variations within (CVw) and between (CVb) subjects
were calculated and presented in percent of the mean. Pearson linear regression
method was used to assess correlations between parameters.
Results
DTI and BOLD MRI measurements were successfully
completed in 10 out of 12 patients and ASL measurements were completed in 9 subjects.
One patient was excluded due to polycystic kidney disease. The CV
w
for medullary and cortical ADC were 2.5% and 2.9%, respectively and the CV
b
for medullary and cortical ADC were 4.2%, and 6.1%, respectively. The
variations were higher for FA (<28%) as well as for F
P, especially
between subjects, CV
b (<35%, Table 1). The CV
w for R2*
in medulla and cortex were 6.5% and 6.9%, respectively, while the CV
b
for R2* were clearly higher (in medulla: 16.6%; in cortex: 14.4%). The CV
w
and CV
b of perfusion results obtained from ASL in cortex were 9.3%
and 10.0%, respectively and in medulla 16.2% and 35.5%, respectively. Figures 1
& 2 show that the values of the second scans for each subject are close to
those obtained from the same subject in the first scans. There were no
significant correlations between R2* and diffusion parameters. Similarly, the
correlation between R2* and perfusion values calculated from ASL was not found
significant and no significant correlations were found between diffusion
parameters and perfusion.
Discussion and Conclusion
High reproducibility was obtained for most
parameters derived from DTI, BOLD and ASL scans. FA showed lower variance in medulla
than in cortex. The high variance for F
P is in concordance with the
high variance between subjects found in the other studies. F
P values
are lower than reported before (6,11), which may be due to shorter TE used in the
present study and improved signal stability. The cortical perfusion derived in
ASL showed low variance between and within subjects. However, medullary
perfusion showed greater variation than cortical perfusion. Low reproducibility
in medullary perfusion has been reported before (7). This increased variability in medulla is most
likely due to the lower SNR as compared to the cortex. ASL signal is directly
proportional to blood flow, and medullary perfusion is much lower than cortical
perfusion (7). There were no significant correlations between
renal perfusion and the other parameters obtained from DTI and BOLD MRI. This is
in contrast to another study showing a significant correlation between
perfusion in ASL and F
P in DTI for transplanted kidney (11).
In conclusion, our results suggest that DTI, BOLD
MRI, and ASL techniques provide reproducible results for different parameters
reflecting renal function. The clearly lower CV
w for some parameters
suggest performing longitudinal studies instead of cross-sectional studies if
possible. No significant correlations between parameters in different methods indicate
that these techniques may yield complementary information in transplanted kidneys.
These measurements build the basis for planning future clinical studies.
Acknowledgements
This work
was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) grant
#31003A-132935 References
1. Eisenberger
U, Binser T, Thoeny H, Boesch C, Frey FJ, Vermathen M. Living Renal Allograft
Transplantation: Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging in Longitudinal Follow-up of the
Donated and the Remaining Kidney. Radiology 2014;270:800-808.
2. Prasad
PV, Thacker J, Li LP, et al. Multi-Parametric Evaluation of Chronic Kidney
Disease by MRI: A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0139661.
3. Lanzman
RS, Ljimani A, Pentang G, et al. Kidney transplant: functional assessment with
diffusion-tensor MR imaging at 3T. Radiology 2013;266:218-225.
4. Lanzman
RS, Wittsack HJ, Martirosian P, et al. Quantification of renal allograft
perfusion using arterial spin labeling MRI: initial results. Eur Radiol
2010;20:1485-1491.
5. Artz
NS, Sadowski EA, Wentland AL, et al. Reproducibility of renal perfusion MR
imaging in native and transplanted kidneys using non-contrast arterial spin
labeling. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:1414-1421.
6. Thoeny
HC, Zumstein D, Simon-Zoula S, et al. Functional evaluation of transplanted
kidneys with diffusion-weighted and BOLD MR imaging: initial experience.
Radiology 2006;241:812-821.
7. Heusch
P, Wittsack HJ, Blondin D, et al. Functional evaluation of transplanted kidneys
using arterial spin labeling MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;40:84-89.
8. Heusch
P, Wittsack HJ, Pentang G, et al. Biexponential analysis of diffusion-weighted
imaging: comparison of three different calculation methods in transplanted
kidneys. Acta Radiol 2013;54:1210-1217.
9. Cutajar
M, Hilton R, Olsburgh J, et al. Renal blood flow using arterial spin labelling
MRI and calculated filtration fraction in healthy adult kidney donors
Pre-nephrectomy and post-nephrectomy. Eur Radiol 2015;25:2390-2396.
10. Martirosian
P, Klose U, Mader I, Schick F. FAIR true-FISP perfusion imaging of the kidneys.
Magn Reson Med 2004;51:353-361.
11.
Heusch P, Wittsack HJ, Heusner T, et
al. Correlation of biexponential diffusion parameters with arterial spin-labeling
perfusion MRI: results in transplanted kidneys. Invest Radiol 2013;48:140-144.