Noninvasive Measurement of Single Renal Oxygen Extraction Fraction using Focused Asymmetric Spin Echo Approach - a feasibility study
CY Wang1, R Zhang2, L Jiang3, R Wang4, XD Zhang4, H Wang3, K Zhao4, LX Jin3, J Zhang1,2, XY Wang1,4, and J Fang1,2

1Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 2College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 3Philips Healthcare, Suzhou, China, People's Republic of, 4Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China, People's Republic of

Synopsis

This study demonstrates the feasibility of combining 2D-RF excitation pulse and ASE sequence (focused ASE sequence, FASE) for single renal OEF measurement. Comparison between images acquired with full-FOV ASE and focused ASE was conducted to confirm the advantages of the focused ASE sequence for single renal imaging. The new technique could reduce artifacts and distortion caused by susceptibility differences, and limit spatial blurring due to T2-decay, which is promising for diagnosis of some renal diseases.

Background:

Evaluation of renal oxygenation plays an important role in the diagnosis of acute renal ischemia (1) and chronic kidney disease (2). Recently, the asymmetric spin echo (ASE) EPI technique (3) has been widely used to probe signal alterations induced by susceptibility effects, which could provide information about renal oxygen extraction fraction (OEF). However, the single-shot EPI acquisition applied in the ASE sequence suffers from the problem of severe susceptibility artifacts and distortion due to the relatively long echo train length (ETL) in renal imaging, even with the advances in parallel imaging. One solution is to reduce the field of view (FOV) of the single-shot EPI with a special designed 2D-RF excitation pulse (4). With the introduction of the 2D-RF pulse, much higher spatial resolution could be achieved for single renal imaging.

Purpose:

This study demonstrates the feasibility of combining 2D-RF excitation pulse and ASE sequence (focused ASE sequence, FASE) for single renal OEF measurement. Comparison between images acquired with full-FOV ASE and focused ASE was conducted to confirm the advantages of the focused ASE sequence for single renal imaging.

Materials and Methods:

Focused Asymmetric Spin-echo Sequence: A single-shot triple-echo ASE sequence with 32 varied echo shifts was
implemented to acquire the source images for renal OEF quantification. The sequence diagram is shown in Fig.1. The ASE sequence is a modification of the spin echo EPI sequence in which the 1800 refocusing pulse has a time offset of τ from TE/2. Furthermore, a 2D-RF excitation pulse was applied to achieve focused renal imaging. The duration of the 2D-RF pulse is typically between 10 ms to 18 ms depending on the FOV in phase encoding direction.

Phantom Studies: To demonstrate the efficacy of this FASE technique, we performed a study using a quality control phantom. MRI measurements were carried out on a 3.0 Tesla MR scanner (Achieva, Philips Medical Systems, Best, Netherlands) with gradient strength = 80 mT/m and gradient slew rate = 200 T/m/s. A 32-channel Cardiac coil was used for signal reception. The FOV for full-FOV acquisition and FASE acquisition were 340 × 220 mm2 and 200 × 220 mm2, respectively. Other parameters were: TR = 2000 ms, TE1/TE2/TE3 = 65/93/121 ms, slice thickness = 5 mm, SENSE factor = 2.

Volunteer Studies: Approved by the local institutional human study committee, ten healthy volunteers (mean age 24.5 ± 3 years) participated in this study. Renal images were acquired with identical scanning parameters as phantom studies. To reduce the impact of the intravascular signal, a pair of small flow dephasing gradients (b = 40 s/mm2) was applied. Respiratory triggering was used to reduce respiratory motion artifacts. The total acquisition time was approximately 3 minutes. To assess the baseline scan-rescan reproducibilities of the the proposed method, both FASE and full-FOV ASE sequences were repeated in a 30 min interval.

Quantitative Analysis: The measurement of renal OEF was
derived from a theoretical model proposed by Yablonskiy and Haacke (5). Two experienced radiologists (with 7 years and 6 years of experience in MRI) scored the images obtaied from two sequences (τ = 0 ms), blinded to the particular acquisition strategy. Images were scored based on both the artifact level and image sharpness using a 5-point scoring system, with 5 as excellent, 4 as good, 3 as fair, 2 as acceptable, and 1 as poor. A paired Student’s t-test was used to compare the results calculated from full-FOV ASE and FASE images with significance level of 0.05.

Results:

Full-FOV and FASE images (τ = 0 ms) of the phantom are shown in Fig.2. Less image distortion was observed in the focused ASE image. And the focused ASE sequence effectively reduced blurring in the PE direction compared to full-FOV ASE. Similar results were found in renal imaging (Fig.3). FASE based original images (τ = 0 ms) and calculated parametrical maps showed significantly better image quality with sufficient depiction of the cortico-medullary structure of the kidneys (Table 1). The baseline scan-rescan CVs of renal OEF measurement were 6.65% in the cortex and 8.13% in the medulla.

Conclusions:

Based on phantom and volunteer studies, we demonstrated the feasibility of combining 2D-RF excitation pulse with ASE sequence for single renal OEF measurement. The new technique could reduce artifacts and distortion caused by susceptibility differences, and limit spatial blurring due to T2-decay, which is promising for diagnosis of some renal diseases.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

[1] Juillard L, et al. Kidney Int. 2004; 65: 944–950.

[2] Nangaku M.. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17(1):17–25.

[3] An H, Lin W. Magn Reson Med 2001;47:958–966.

[4] Saritas E, et. al. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60:468–473.

[5] Yablonskiy DA, Haacke EM. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:749-763.

Figures

Fig.1. Diagram of the focused ASE sequence for renal OEF measurement.

Fig.2. Images of the quality control phantom acquired using full-FOV ASE (a,c) and focused ASE (b,d) sequences (τ = 0 ms). The focused ASE sequence effectively reduced blurring in the PE direction compared to full-FOV ASE. Less image distortion was observed in focused ASE image (τ = 0 ms).

Fig.3. Comparisons between full-FOV ASE and focused ASE in a healthy volunteer: full-FOV ASE image with τ = 0 ms (a), and the corresponding R2 map (b), R2’ map (c), OEF map (d), focused ASE image with τ = 0 ms (e), and the corresponding R2 map (f), R2’ map (g), and OEF map (h). Note that the partial volume artifacts are greatly reduced with focused ASE technique due to higher spatial resolution.

Table 1. Image scores for full-FOV ASE and focused ASE techniques (n = 10)



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0268