Xinwei Lei1, Jin QU1, Ying ZHAN1, Huixia Li1, and Yu Zhang2
1Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, China, People's Republic of, 2Philips Healthcare, Beijin, China, People's Republic of
Synopsis
The aim of study was to explore whether
synovitis and bone erosion judged by ADC values correspond exactly or not to
those judged by CE-MRI. 25 patients were examined by 3.0T MR including DWI and
CE-MRI. ADC value of synovitis and bone erosion was significantly lower than
that of joint effusion and cysts. ADC values of 2.0 was found distinguishing
joint effusion from synovitis, and bone erosion from cysts. Therefore, MR
diffusion provides additional information to the routine MRI sequences
rendering it an effective non-invasive tool in differentiating between
synovitis and joint effusion, as well as bone erosion and
cysts.Purpose:
Both of synovitis and
joint effusion showed low signal intensity on T1WI, high signal intensity on
T2WI and DWI. Although synovitis has a relatively lower signal intensity than
joint effusion in T2WI, it is difficult to distinguish them due to similar
contrast. Synovitis was judged by CE-MRI according to the definition by the OMERACT
1.
The differentiation between bone erosion and cysts in OA is also extremely
difficult without CE-MRI, since MRI bone erosion was enhanced based on either
invading synovial tissue (pannus). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping
provides a non-invasive mean of detecting synovitis and bone erosion in their
early stage. To our knowledge, this is first study to investigate synovitis and
bone erosion by using ADC mapping so far. The aim of study was to assess the
value of ADC mapping in distinguishing synovitis from joint fluid , as well as bone erosion from cysts.
Methods:
25 patients (6 male, 19 female, age = 50.68 ±7.96 years) with suspect RA who had swelling and pain of the wrists and hands.
The MR imaging examinations were performed with using 3.0 T MR acquisition
systems (Ingenia; Philips Healthcare, the Netherlands) by using a quadrature
body coil to cover bilateral wrists and hands. The imaging parameters for transverse
DWI: TR/TE, 4300 ms/58.9 ms; b value, 0 and 600 s/mm2, slice
thickness/gap, 5 /0.5 mm; FOV, 300× 95 mm; and matrix, 152 × 63. Contrast-enhanced
imaging (TR/TE, 10.308/2.052ms; flip angle, 10°; slice thickness/gap, 1.2 /0 mm;
FOV, 300 × 300 mm; matrix, 320 × 320). Images were evaluated for the presence
of synovitis and joint effusion in the wrist(distal radioulnar joint,
radiocarpal joint, intercarpal-carpometa carpophalangeal joints) according to
the EULAR-OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI reference image atlas and joints of
the hand including (metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints I–V, proximal
interphalangeal (PIP) joints I–V, the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints II–V).
T-test was used for the comparison between the mean ADC values of bone erosion
and cysts, synovitis and joint effusion by using IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0
(Armonk, New York, USA). P < 0.01 was considered statistically significant. Differences
between ADC values in synovitis and joint fluid, and bone erosion and cysts were
compared using ROC analysis.
Result:
93 suspect synovitis and 70 suspect bone erosion were found by anatomical
MRI. 53 synovitis (mean ADC values=1.63
±0.375 x10
-3mm
2 /s), 40 joint fluid (mean ADC values=2.6 ±0.369
x10
-3mm
2 /s), 62 bone erosion(mean ADC values =1.61 ±0.39 x10
-3
mm
2 /s) and 8 cysts (mean ADC values =2.39 ±0.318 x10
-3 mm
2
/s) were found by CE- MRI. ADC value of synovitis was significantly lower than
that of the joint effusion. ADC value of bone erosion was significantly lower
than that of the cysts. ADC values of 2.0 10
-3mm
2 /s was found, distinguishing joint effusion
from synovitis (specificity= 90 %, sensitivity=90 %; ROC AUC=0.974), and bone erosion
from cysts (specificity= 90 %, sensitivity=87.5 %; ROC=AUC 0.952).
Discussion:
DWI can reliably
detect and characterize synovitis of wrist and hand. Inflamed lesions were seen
as hyperintense relative to the surrounding presumably normal tissues on DWI
due to the infiltration of the inflammatory cells which could demonstrate impeded
molecular water mobility. Because it was very difficult to perform exact and reproducible
ADC measurements in the small positive areas of wrist and hand with such
complex anatomical structures. There have been no studies of the relation
between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values from changes of synovium and
bone with RA
2, although measurement of ADC values is valuable for
the diagnosis of bone tumors
3 and arthritis such as sacroiliitis
4.
In our study, ADC values of bone erosion and synovitis were lower than cysts and
joint effusion. We therefore conclude that measurement of ADC values could be
effective in quantifying changes of inflammation in skeletal lesions.
Conclusion:
MR diffusion provides
additional information to the routine MRI sequences rendering it an effective
non-invasive tool in differentiating between synovitis and joint effusion, and bone
erosion and cysts.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Østergaard M, Edmonds J,
McQueen F, et al. An introduction to the EULAR-OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI
reference image atlas. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Feb;64 Suppl 1:i3-7.
2.
Li X, Liu X, Du X, et al.
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for assessing synovitis of wrist and hand in
patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a feasibility study. Magn Reson Imaging.
2014 May;32(4):350-3.
3.
Genovese E, Canì A, Rizzo S, et
al. Comparison between MRI with spin-echo echo-planar diffusion-weighted
sequence (DWI) and histology in the diagnosis of soft-tissue tumours. Radiol
Med. 2011 Jun;116(4):644-56.
4.
Gaspersic N, Sersa I, Jevtic V,
Tomsic M, Praprotnik S. Monitoring ankylosing spondylitis therapy by dynamic
contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Skeletal
Radiol 2008;37(2):123–31.