In vivo 7T Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping of Cortical Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis
Wei Bian1, Eric Tranvinh1, Thomas Tourdias2, May Han3, Tian Liu4, Yi Wang4, Brian Rutt1, and Michael Zeineh1

1Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States, 2Service de NeuroImagerie Diagnostique et Thérapeutique, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, 3Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States, 4Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States

Synopsis

Magnetic susceptibility measured with quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) has been proposed as a biomarker for inflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS) white matter (WM) lesions. However, a detailed in vivo characterization of cortical lesions has not been performed. In this study, the susceptibility in both cortical and WM lesions relative to adjacent normal-appearing parenchyma was measured and compared for 14 MS patients using QSM at 7T. Our results showed that relative susceptibility was negative for cortical lesions but positive for WM lesions. The opposite pattern of relative susceptibility suggests that iron loss dominates the susceptibility contrast in cortical lesions.

Purpose

To measure magnetic susceptibility in cortical lesions of multiple sclerosis (MS) and compare it to that in white matter lesions using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM).

Introduction

Magnetic susceptibility measured with QSM has been proposed as a biomarker for demyelination and inflammation in MS white matter (WM) lesions1, but a detailed characterization of cortical lesions has yet to be performed. Since normal cortex and cortical lesions have lower degree of myelin and inflammation than normal WM and WM lesions2, respectively, we hypothesize that the susceptibility values relative to surrounding parenchyma for cortical lesions may be different from that for WM lesions.

Methods

Patients: 14 MS patients (13 had relapsing-remitting MS, and 1 had secondary progressive MS; age 40.4 ± 7.9 years, 7.9 ± 7.2 years of disease duration) were recruited for an MRI study. MR Imaging: T1-weighted white matter or CSF nulled magnetization prepared rapid acquisition imaging (WMnMPRGE or CSFnMPRAGE), T2-FLAIR and T2*-weighted imaging were performed on a GE 7T scanner. The T2*-weighted imaging (2D SPGR sequence; TE/TR=17.7/1200ms; FA=60°; FOV=180x180x90mm3; Resolution= 0.47x0.47x1mm3; BW=19.2KHz) was used to compute QSM images using the morphology-enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) method3. Lesion Identification and Segmentation: All anatomical images were used concordantly to identify lesions. Blinded to QSM images, we manually segmented lesions with size ≥ 2mm by drawing regions of interests (ROIs) covering hyperintense voxels on T2*-weighed magnitude images. WM and cortical lesion ROIs were drawn only within WM and cortex, respectively (Figure 1). Reference ROIs were also drawn on adjacent normal-appearing WM (NAWM) and normal-appearing gray matter (NAGM) for WM and cortical lesions, respectively (Figure 1). Blood vessels within each ROI were excluded. Prior 3.0T clinical MRIs were reviewed to estimate the age of white matter lesions (cortical lesions could not be accurately assessed on these clinical scans). Data Analysis: To calculate relative susceptibility value in a lesion, the mean susceptibility value in the lesion ROI was subtracted by the same value in its adjacent normal-appearing ROIs. The relative susceptibility values for the set of cortical lesions and for the set of WM lesions were compared to zero using the one-sample t-test. This was performed to assess the per-lesion-type difference between WM and cortical lesions. The relative susceptibility values for all cortical lesions and for all WM lesions were also averaged in the same subject, respectively, and then the above t-test was repeated to assess the per-lesion-type per-subject difference. The statistical significance threshold was set as p<0.05.

Results

A total of 176 lesions were identified, of which 28 (15.9%) were cortical while 148 (84.1%) were WM. Prior clinical 3T MR scans indicated that all WM lesions were older than 3 months. The relative susceptibility value was positive for 133 of the 148 (89.9%) WM lesions, but negative for 25 of the 28 (89.3%) cortical lesions (Figure 2). The relative susceptibility value was significantly higher than zero for WM lesions ( 0.014±0.014ppm, p<10-23), but significantly lower than zero for cortical lesions ( ‑0.018±0.013ppm, p<10-7). The patient-averaged relative susceptibility value was again significantly higher than zero ( 0.013±0.010ppm, p<0.0006) for WM lesions but significantly lower than zero (‑0.017±0.012ppm, p<0.006) for cortical lesions. The QSM images illustrate these quantitative difference, with WM lesions being hyperintense and cortical lesions being hypointense relative to their adjacent normal appearing parenchyma (Figure 3).

Discussion

Demyelination (loss of diamagnetic myelin) and accumulation of paramagnetic iron has been interpreted as major contributors to the increased susceptibility in MS lesions1. However, iron content in chronic inactive WM lesions could be lower than that in NAWM4. Since our measured susceptibility in the majority of chronic WM lesions was still positive relative to NAWM, the effect of demyelination may dominate over that of iron loss on the susceptibility changes in chronic WM lesions. On the contrary, the negative relative susceptibility values of cortical lesions, which has been seen in a postmortem QSM study5, suggests that iron loss dominates over demyelination in the susceptibility changes of cortical lesions. Substantial iron loss in cortical lesions has been reported in previous histological studies6, but the pathology for the iron loss remains unclear. One of possible explanations could be low degree of inflammation in cortical lesions, resulting in a small amount of infiltration of macrophages/microglia, which are the holders of iron released from damaged oligodendrocytes in MS lesions.

Conclusion

In summary, high field QSM reveals a negative relative magnetic susceptibility in cortical lesions and a positive one in WM lesions, suggesting that iron loss dominates the susceptibility contrast in cortical lesions. The susceptibility difference between WM and cortical lesions may have implications for MS progression.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by NIH grant P41 EB015891 and S10 RR026351

References

1. Chen W, Gauthier SA, Gupta A, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of multiple sclerosis lesions at various ages. Radiology. 2014; 271: 183-92.

2. Peterson JW, Bo L, Mork S, et al. Transected neurites, apoptotic neurons, and reduced inflammation in cortical multiple sclerosis lesions. Ann Neurol. 2001;50(3):389-400.

3. Liu J, Liu T, de Rochefort L, et al. Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map. Neuroimage. 2012;59(3):2560-8.

4. Hametner S, Wimmer I, Haider L, et al. Iron and neurodegeneration in the multiple sclerosis brain. Ann Neurol. 2013; 74: 848-61.

5. Wisnieff C, Ryan R, Pitt D, et al. Investigation of Susceptibility Contrast in Grey and White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2014; 22: 3403.

6. Yao B, Bagnato F, Matsuura E, et al. Chronic multiple sclerosis lesions: characterization with high-field-strength MR imaging. Radiology. 2012; 262: 206-15.

Figures

(a) ROI (red outlines) of a cortical lesion (red arrows) and the ROI of its adjacent normal-appearing cortical gray matter counterpart (green outlines). (b) ROI (blue outlines) of a WM lesion (blue arrows) and its adjacent normal-appearing white matter counterpart (pink outlines) circumscribing the WM lesion.

The relative susceptibility values in each individual lesion and the mean relative susceptibility values after averaging the relative susceptibility across all lesions per type for each patient (13 patients had WM lesions and 8 patients had cortical lesions).

MR images of representative WM and cortical lesions from two patients in (a) and (b), respectively. Two WM lesions (blue arrows) and three cortical lesions (red arrows) are shown. Note WM and cortical lesions are hyper- and hypo-intense relative to their adjacent parenchyma on QSM images, respectively.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0246