Synopsis
Because of the much higher SAR and longer
acquisition time, in-vivo studies using MT at UHF have not been clinically
feasible. In this work, we demonstrated a new approach (variable density MT
[vdMT])for acquiring whole brain covered 7T MT data in a clinically reasonable
time. vdMT provides similar image quality to that obtained with conventional MT
imaging, and shortens the scan time by avoiding from SAR limitation. The
proposed method generates high-resolution MT data in reasonable scan time and
it exhibits high similarity with the conventional method. Moreover, it maintains
sensitivity to MS lesions.Introduction
As the use of ultra-high field
(UHF) MR imaging expands, there is an increasing need to establish
high-resolution imaging protocols for clinical use. Magnetization transfer (MT)
imaging
[1] has been used to provide
information about tissue structure and pathological changes
[2-4]. Because of the much higher specific
absorption rate (SAR) of tissue and longer acquisition time, however, in-vivo
studies using MT at UHF have not been clinically feasible. We have proposed variable
density magnetization transfer(vdMT) technique, and demonstrated the
feasibility of MT scan at 7T
[5,6]. In
this study, we 1) investigated effects of varying MT densities in the center of
k-space and TRs, and 2) demonstrated whole brain MT scans of Multiple Sclerosis
(MS) patients using vdMT at 7T in a clinically reasonable scan time.
Methods
Data were collected from an agar
phantom
[7], four controls, an MS
postmortem brain and four MS patients in a 7T MRI (Siemens; IRB approved). Figure
1 shows how k-space is acquired in vdMT. To reduce SAR while maintaining similar
MT saturation, along the kz-direction the MT pulses are applied
every TR in central k-space and sparsely applied in peripheral k-space region. Consequently,
vdMT results in lower SAR than conventional MT.
To investigate vdMT signal
characteristics, two experiments using an agar phantom were conducted. Data
were acquired with combinations of TR and MT density as a function of MT offset
frequencies (–10kHz~ 0Hz). For vdMT imaging parameters optimization, four sets
of vdMT (MT
H50L5, MT
H40L5, MT
H30L5, and MT
H20L5)
and a conventional MT data were acquired from each volunteer. Minimum TR (within
SAR limitation) was used. To demonstrate the spatial distribution of the MTR
map using high-resolution vdMT, data from postmortem MS brain and MS patients
were acquired with optimized parameters (MT
H40L5, TR/TE=45/3.5ms, 104 slices, (0.75mm)
3-isotropic voxel and
GRAPPA factor=3). Parameter-matched GRE data were acquired for MTR
calculation. MT saturation (MT
SS=100×[M
S/M
0] where M
S and M
0 represent values with and without MT-prepared
signal intensity) and MTR (=[M
0-M
S]/M
0) maps were generated. After
generating MTR maps, non-uniform B
1 induced error was corrected
[8]. To measure similarity between conventional
method and vdMT, a voxel-wise correlation was calculated.
Results
As the level of MT density in the
central k-space increased, the amount of signal saturation in the vdMT
increased (Fig. 2A). All vdMT scans with the same TR as the conventional MT
provided lower MT saturation than conventional MT. However, MTH40L5 demonstrated
comparable MT-saturation compared with the conventional MT. This suggests that
the amount of MT-saturation can be increased with increasing dense MT RF area
in the central k-space.
When the TR was decreased, the
amount of MT-saturation was increased (Fig. 2B). vdMT using the same TR as the conventional
method provided the lowest MT-saturation. In contrast, the shortest TR generated
the highest MT-saturation. These results show that a shorter TR in vdMT leads
to a higher MT-saturation, suggesting that MT-saturation is maintained over
several TRs if TR is short.
MTR maps using vdMT from controls
demonstrated 18.3% higher tissue contrast than conventional MT. Among the MTR
maps which show higher white matter MTR value than conventional MT, MTH40L5
demonstrated the nearest MTR value to the conventional MT. Hence, the level of
MT dense area is optimized with H=40.
Results in Fig. 3 point to the
similarities between vdMT and conventional method in image quality. When
voxel-wise correlation was performed, the mean correlation coefficients were
0.9. These results suggest a high degree of similarity between the two methods.
When the MTR map from the postmortem brain was qualitatively investigated, any
noticeable artifacts were not seen.
Figure 4 shows MTH40L5
images from T1-weighted, FLAIR, T2*-weighted,
and MTR maps of a postmortem MS brain (A-H) and of an MS patient (I-P). MS
lesions demonstrated hypo signal in the T1-weighted image and hyper
signal in the FLAIR and T2*-weighted images. The
corresponding areas in the MTR maps demonstrated significantly reduced signal
levels, clearly delineating lesions.
Discussions and Conclusions
In this work, we demonstrated a new
approach for acquiring whole brain covered 7T MT data in a clinically reasonable
time. Our vdMT method provides similar image quality to that obtained with conventional
MT imaging, and shortens the scan time, or TR by avoiding from SAR limitation,
which minimize the incidence of motion artifacts. The proposed method generates
high-resolution MT data in reasonable scan time and it exhibits high similarity
with the conventional method. Moreover, it maintains sensitivity to MS lesions.
These features make the vdMT method appealing for clinical neuroimaging applications
in UHF.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Cleveland Clinic. Author
gratefully acknowledges technical support by Siemens Medical Solutions.References
[1] Balaban and Ceckler, “Magnetization transfer
contrast in magnetic resonance imaging”, Magn Reson Q. 1992
Jun;8(2):116-37.
[2] A. Gass, G. J. Barker, D. Kidd, J. W. Thorpe, D.
MacManus, A. Brennan, P. S. Tofts, A. J. Thompson, W. I. McDonald, and D. H. Miller,
“Correlation of Magnetization Transfer Ratio with Clinical Disability in Multiple
Sclerosis” , Annals of Neurology, 1994; 36(1):62-7
[3] Celia
Oreja-Guevara, Arnaud Charil, Domenico Caputo, Rosella Cavarretta, Maria Pia
Sormani, Massimo Filippi, “Magnetization Transfer Magnetic Resonance Imaging
and Clinical Changes in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis”, Arch
Neurol. 2006;63(5):736-740
[4] Stefan Ropele, Siegried Strasser-Fuchs, Michael
Augustin, Rudolf Stollberger, Christian Enzinger, Hans-Peter Hartung, and Franz
Fazekas, “A Comparison of Magnetization Transfer Ratio, Magnetization Transfer
Rate, and the Native Relaxation Time of Water Protons Related to
Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis”, AJNR, 2000, 21:1885–1891
[5] Se-Hong Oh, Wanyong Shin, and Mark J Lowe,
“Reduced specific absorption rate (SAR) Magnetization Transfer imaging with Low
Density MT pulse technique for 7 Tesla”, ISMRM, 2015, Toronto, 819
[6] Se-Hong Oh, Wanyong Shin, Jongho
Lee, and Mark J Lowe, “Reduced specific absorption rate (SAR) and scan time
using variable density Magnetization Transfer (vdMT) for 7T”, ISMRM, 2015,
Toronto, 3192
[7] Lee Friedman and Gary H. Glover, “Report on a
Multicenter fMRI Quality Assurance Protocol”, JMRI, 2006, 23:827–839
[8] Stefan Ropele, Massimo Filippi, Paola Valsasina,
Tijmen Korteweg, Frederik Barkhof, Paul S. Tofts, Rebecca Samson, David H.
Miller and Franz Fazekas, “Assessment and correction of B1-induced errors in
magnetization transfer ratio measurements”, MRM, 2005, 53(1), 134-140