Sarah Nelson1, Yan Li1, Janine Lupo1, Marram Olson1, Jason Crane1, Annette Molinaro2, Ritu Roy3, Soonmee Cha1, and Susan Chang2
1Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States, 2Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States, 3Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
Synopsis
Patients with
newly diagnosed GBM are typically treated with a combination of radiation and
temozolomide in conjunction with a variety of investigational agents. Assessing
the effectiveness of such therapies is complicated by differences in their
mechanisms of action that lead to ambiguities in the interpretation of
conventional anatomic images and difficulties in assessing the spatial extent
of tumor. The results of this study demonstrate
that integrating 3D lactate edited H-1 MRSI into routine MR examinations and
applying quantitative analysis methods allows for the objective evaluation of
changes in tumor burden and the early assessment of outcome. Purpose
The purpose of
this study was to develop and apply strategies for monitoring serial changes in
parameters derived from H-1 MRSI for patients with newly diagnosed GBM being
treated with combination therapy. This is particularly important for situations
where anti-angiogenic agents such as bevacizumab are included because they
cause a reduction in the size of the lesion observed with post-gadolinium
T1-weighted images and mean that the assessment of response depends upon the
identification and evaluation of non-enhancing tumor
1.
Methods
Thirty-one
patients being treated with radiation (RT), temozolomide, erlotinib and
bevacizumab as part of a single institution Phase II clinical trial, received
serial 3T scans. Anatomic imaging sequences comprised FLAIR T2-weighted, pre- and
post-gadolinium T1-weighted scans. Lactate edited 3D H-1 MRSI data were obtained
with CHESS water suppression, VSS outer volume suppression and PRESS volume
selection (TE=144ms, TR= 1.3s, acquisition matrix of 16x16x16 or 18x18x16 and nominal
spatial resolution =1cm3). Fly-back trajectories were applied in the
S/I dimension as described previously
2. The contrast enhancing (CEL) and T2 lesion
were defined from anatomic images. The spectral data were processed
3 to
provide levels of choline (Cho), creatine (Cre), N-acetylaspartate (NAA),
lactate (Lac) and lipid (Lip), as well as indices such as the CNI that
describes the increase in Cho and decrease in NAA relative to values from
normal appearing brain tissue
4. Serial changes in imaging parameters were
evaluated using Wilcoxon rank sign tests and association with progression free
survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed using Cox proportional
hazards analysis, taking into account patient age, extent of resection and KPS.
Results
As reported in
other clinical studies
5, the PFS for these patients was longer (median 404
days, 27 events, 4 censored) but the OS was similar to patients receiving
standard of care (median 603 days, 23 events, 8 censored). The mean T2 lesion
volume decreased from 36.2cm3 at pre-RT to 15.3cm3
(post-RT, p<0.0001) and to 14.7cm3 (Fup1, p=0.0002). The mean CEL
volume decreased from 5.2 cm3 (pre-RT) to 3.0 cm3 (mid-RT,
p=0.018), 2.1 cm3 (post-RT,p=0.0002) and 0.7cm3 (Fup1, p
<0.0001). Figure 1 shows changes in metabolite parameters from these first 4
exams for sub-populations with PFS either greater or less than the median value.
Overall these metrics of abnormal metabolism showed a continued reduction with
time, and values for the sub-group with longer PFS were lower than those with
shorter PFS. Figures 2 and 3 show examples of serial anatomic images and
overlays of CNI maps from baseline to the time of progression for 2 subjects
with similar PFS but different OS. Note that there was minimal residual
enhancement for both subjects and the clinical assessment of treatment response
relied upon changes in the T2 lesion. The metabolic (CNI) lesion at the time of
recurrence was relatively small for patient A (OS=706 days), but much larger
and increasing in size for patient B (OS=434 days). When considering the
population as a whole, a number of imaging parameters were associated with PFS
and OS. These included the volume of the CEL at mid-RT (p=0.025 for PFS and p=0.039
for OS) but not other time points. For metabolic parameters such as the volume
with CNI>2, the sum(CNI), sum(Lac/nNAA) and sum(Lip/nNAA) values from the
Fup1 examination showed strong associations with PFS and OS (see Table 1).
There was no association of the T2 lesion volume with outcome detected these
time points.
Discussion
The RANO
criteria for assessing response to therapy in patients with GBM depend upon
changes in the CEL, with secondary evaluation of the T2 lesion
6. This is
problematic for treatments including anti-angiogenic agents because the
enhancing portion of the lesion may disappear, leaving behind a mixture of non-enhancing
tumor and non-specific treatment effects. An alternative approach to assessing
tumor burden is to use 3-D H-1 MRSI to monitor changes in regions with abnormal
metabolism. The results of this study indicate that maps of the CNI were able
to visualize temporal changes in the spatial extent of tumor and that metrics
based upon CNI values and levels of Lac and Lip within the region with abnormal
CNI are able to predict outcome.
Conclusions
Integrating 3D
H-1 MRSI and the metabolic parameters that they provide into serial MR scans of
patients with GBM would be helpful for resolving ambiguities cause by non-specific
treatment effects and for determining at an early stage whether alternative therapies
should be considered.
Acknowledgements
This research
was supported by NIH grants RO1
CA127612 and P01 CA118816.References
1.
Pope WB, Lai A, Nghiemphu P, Mischel P, Cloughesy TF. MRI in patients with high-grade gliomas treated
with bevacizumab and chemotherapy. Neurology 2006;66:1258-60.
2. Park
I, Chen AP, Zierhut ML, et al. Implementation of 3T lactate-edited 3D 1H MR
spectroscopic imaging with flyback echo-planar readout for glioma patients. Ann
Biomed Eng. 2011;39:193 – 204.
3. Crane JC, Olson MP, Nelson SJ. SIVIC: Open-Source,
Standards-Based Software for DICOM MR Spectroscopy Workflows. Int J Biomed
Imaging. 2013;2013:169526.
4. McKnight TR, von dem Bussche MH, Vigneron DB, et al.
Histopathological validation of a three-dimensional magnetic resonance
spectroscopy index as a predictor of tumor presence. J. Neurosurg. 2002;97(4):794–802.
5. Mark R. Gilbert, James J. Dignam, Terri
S. Armstrong, et al. A Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab for Newly Diagnosed
Glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:699-708.
6. Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen AG, Galanis E, Degroot J, Wick W, Gilbert MR, Lassman AB, Tsien C, Mikkelsen T, Wong ET, Chamberlain MC, Stupp R, Lamborn KR, Vogelbaum MA, van den Bent MJ, Chang SM. Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response
assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1963-72.