Lei Qin1,2, Xiang Li2,3, Amanda Stroiney4, David A Reardon1,2, and Geoffrey Young2,3
1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, boston, MA, United States, 2Harvard Medical School, boston, MA, United States, 3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States, 4Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States
Synopsis
The
purpose of this study is to evaluate the predictive value of quantitative and
semi-quantitative MRI biomarkers in determining patient benefit in anti-PD1
immunotherapy treatments. Longitudinal MRIs were performed on patients
diagnosed with recurrent GBM. Volumetric analysis of abnormal tissue from contrast
enhanced T1, FLAIR, and ADC revealed two distinct patterns: a) progressive
increase volume in patients who derived no significant benefit, and b) a
transient increase in the volume, followed by a delayed decrease in patients
with >6 mo survival on trial. In this preliminary study (n=10), the data
suggest that the volume of abnormal tissue on ADC seems to correlate better
with patient benefit than abnormality on FLAIR and T1. Introduction
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain
tumors, with over 10,000 cases diagnosed in the United States each year. Current gold-standard treatment with surgery, radiation, and chemo-therapy
have significantly improved 2 year survival but not 5-year survival remains less
than 10%. Immunotherapy is
a very promising treatment, based on the use of antibodies against immune checkpoints such as cytotoxic T
lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)
1,2. As these immunotherapies enter the clinic, improved assessment
of response has become a critical need because immunotherapy induced
inflammation produces edema and contrast enhancement difficult to distinguish
from progressive tumo. We report preliminary data from a retrospective analysis designed to
assess the predictive value of quantitative and semi-quantitative MRI biomarkers
including volumetric analysis of contrast enhanced T1, T2 FLAIR,
and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) to distinguish patients with treatment response from
non-responders.
Method
Longitudinal MRIs were performed on patients diagnosed with recurrent GBM. Patients
had MRIs every 2 months with contrast enhanced T1, T2 FLAIR and DWI during the
treatment.
Tumor volumes-of-interest (VOIs) were drawn on T1 and T2 FLAIR images.
The FLAIR VOIs were copied to the registered apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)
maps. Inside the VOIs, only voxels with ADC values in the range of (0.7~1.1)×10
-3
mm
2/s were calculated into the ADC volume (Fig 1). The volume of
the tumor was also measured on T1 and T2 FLAIR images. The
abnormal tissue volumetrics were analyzed along with tumor pathologies and clinical
trial length as a primary outcome measure of clinical benefit.
Results
Including patients who had (a) progression free survival on the trial
>6 months, or (b) trial duration of >2 months with surgical pathology
following conventional imaging progression, yielded 10 patients with analyzable
data. Among
the 10 patients, 5 were deemed to have received benefit from treatment based on
progression free survival on trial for more than 6 months. One of this group had
pathology demonstrating predominant inflammation and necrotic tumor. The other
5 patients were deemed to have received no substantial benefit from the
treatment based on removal from trial for clinically worse symptoms and/or MRI
followed by surgical resection revealing substantial viable tumor (Fig 2).
The average time on trial for the no benefit group was 82 days, as comparing to
229.2 days for the benefit group.
We also plotted the volume change
curves for T1, FLAIR and ADC during immunotherapy treatment.
For all members of the no benefit group, all three volumes increased, except one
patient whose FLAIR volume was stable.
For the benefit group, the ADC volumes all increase initially and then
decrease or stabilized. Contrast enhanced T1 volumes showed inconsistent
patterns: increasing in 2 patients (patient 6 and 8) and decreasing in the
other 3. FLAIR volume change pattern was very similar to ADC except for patient
9. The volume of abnormal tissue on ADC
seems to correlate better with patient benefit than abnormality on FLAIR or
contrast enhanced T1. Figure 3 and 4 show typical cases from the two
groups.
Time from
start of immunotherapy to the point when ADC and FLAIR volume curves began to
decrease was 2~6 months for the patients who received benefit.
Discussion and Conclusion
Immunotherapy is known to cause inflammation, making assessment of
response difficult. Our preliminary data derived from anti-PD1 treatment of
recurrent GBM suggest that all three volumes increase for the first 2~3 months
even in patients who ultimately received significant benefit. Although early
increase in volume of intermediate/low ADC tissue has been demonstrated to
correlate with response and survival in patients treated with XRT and
chemoradiation
3,4, it does not seem to predict progression in anti-PD1
immunotherapy patients, at least in the first 2 months. Among the possible
explanations for this are non-exclusive possibilities: (a) that immunotherapy
may have a delayed onset of cytotoxic effect and (b) that immunotherapy initially
produces an inflammatory cell swelling that decreases ADC. Further
investigation in animal models seems indicated.
This raises the possibility that some patients who receive no benefit
from the treatment might have benefitted if they had remained on treatment
longer. Also of note, all 3 patients who received combined anti-PD1 and
anti-CTLA4 drugs were in the benefit group with a survival of at least 8 months
(244 - 320 days) from the start of immunotherapy and two out of the three
patients continue on therapy at this time. Whether this reflects improved
tolerance of the therapy, improved efficacy or both is under ongoing
investigation.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Reardon,
D. A., G. Freeman, C. Wu, E. A. Chiocca, K. W. Wucherpfennig, P. Y. Wen, et al.
(2014a). "Immunotherapy advances for glioblastoma." Neuro Oncol 16(11):
1441-1458.
2.
Reardon,
D. A., K. V. Ballman, J. C. Buckner, S. M. Chang and B. M. Ellingson (2014b).
"Impact of imaging measurements on response assessment in glioblastoma
clinical trials." Neuro Oncol 16 Suppl 7: vii24-35.
3.
Yamasaki,
F., K. Sugiyama, M. Ohtaki, Y. Takeshima, N. Abe, Y. Akiyama, J. Takaba, V. J.
Amatya, T. Saito, Y. Kajiwara, R. Hanaya and K. Kurisu (2010).
"Glioblastoma treated with postoperative radio-chemotherapy: Prognostic
value of apparent diffusion coefficient at MR imaging." European Journal
of Radiology 73(3): 532-537.
4.
Elson,
A., J. Bovi, M. Siker, C. Schultz and E. Paulson (2015). "Evaluation of
absolute and normalized apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values within the
post-operative T2/FLAIR volume as adverse prognostic indicators in
glioblastoma." Journal of Neuro-Oncology 122(3): 549-558.