Gopikrishna Deshpande1,2,3, D Rangaprakash1, Wenjing Yan1, Jeffrey S Katz1,2,3, Thomas S Denney1,2,3, and Michael N Dretsch4,5
1AU MRI Research Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States, 2Department of Psychology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States, 3Alabama Advanced Imaging Consortium, Auburn University and University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States, 4U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory, Fort Rucker, AL, United States, 5Human Dimension Division, HQ TRADOC, Fort Eustis, VA, United States
Synopsis
Functional
MRI is an indirect measure of neural activity, as it is the convolution of the
hemodynamic-response function (HRF) and a latent neural response. Recent
studies show variance in HRF across brain regions and subjects. This raises the
question of reliability of fMRI results if, for example, a canonical HRF is
used in analysis. Using whole-brain resting-state fMRI, we employed blind hemodynamic
deconvolution to estimate HRF parameters. We uncovered hemodynamic alterations
in Soldiers with PTSD and mTBI, and found that certain subcortical and
default-mode network regions showed significant alterations in HRF.Introduction
Functional
MRI (fMRI) is used extensively for studying neural correlates of brain
functioning. FMRI is an indirect measure of neural activity as it measures changes
in blood oxygenation level. Most fMRI studies assume a standard canonical
hemodynamic response function (HRF) during analysis. However, recent advances
show variability in HRF for different brain regions across subjects [1]. This challenges
the interpretation of fMRI results since it is unclear if observed changes are
due to neural activity or HRF variability. In this work, we identified HRF
differences in Soldiers with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and
postconcussion syndrome (PCS, chronic outcome associated with mild traumatic
brain injury [mTBI]).
Recent
evidences using Doppler ultrasound and infrared spectroscopy suggested
alterations in cerebrovascular reactivity in mTBI [2]. Although neurochemical
alterations in PTSD are well established [3], it is important to explore if
these changes affect cerebrovascular reactivity. We hypothesized that the HRF,
which depends on cerebrovascular reactivity and neurovascular coupling, may be
altered in PTSD and mTBI. We tested the hypothesis by estimating the underlying
HRF by performing blind hemodynamic deconvolution of resting-state fMRI data
obtained from these populations.
Methods
Resting-state fMRI data was obtained from 87
male U.S. Army Soldiers (17 having PTSD, 42 having comorbid PTSD and PCS [PCS+PTSD]
and 28 matched combat controls) in a 3T Siemens Verio scanner using T2*-weighted
multiband-EPI sequence, with TR=600ms, TE=30ms, FA=55°, voxel size=3×3×5mm3,
2 sessions and 1000 volumes. Standard pre-processing was performed (realignment,
normalization to MNI space, detrending, regressing out nuisance-covariates). Each
voxel timeseries was then subjected to blind hemodynamic deconvolution; “blind”
because it estimates both the HRF and underlying latent neuronal variables from
just the observed fMRI data. We employed the deconvolution technique proposed
by Wu et al. [4] which considers resting-state fMRI as a spontaneous
pseudo-event-related signal and uses a variant of Weiner deconvolution. The HRF
at each voxel in each subject was characterized by three parameters – response
height (RH), time-to-peak (TTP), and full-width at half-wax (FWHM). Whole-brain
two-sample t-tests were performed separately on the three parameters to obtain
group-wise voxel-specific differences in HRF parameters (p<0.05,
cluster-level thresholded at 400mm3, controlled for age, race,
education and head-motion). This was done separately for the three pairwise
comparisons between groups, and resulting binary maps were overlapped (with
cluster-level threshold of 50mm3, in overlapped map) to obtain final
maps.
Results and Discussion
In all the
regions with altered HRF, we found that RH increased in the disorders compared
to controls, while TTP and FWHM decreased in the disorders. This indicates that
PTSD and PCS+PTSD are characterized by taller, quicker and narrower HRF in affected
regions. We first elucidate the differences for Control vs Disease comparison,
which refers to an overlap of Control vs PTSD and Control vs PCS+PTSD
comparisons. Differences in RH were found in (see Fig.1) thalamus, midbrain,
precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), secondary visual areas and parts
of insula (anterior and posterior). Given that PTSD is an anxiety disorder,
prior work shows abnormal GABAergic and glutamatergic systems relate to anxiety
[5], with thalamus being anatomically well situated to produce the experience
of anxiety [6], and serotonin in the midbrain playing a key role in anxiety
disorders [7]. Further, alterations in TTP (Fig.2) and FWHM (Fig.3) largely
overlapped, with key default-mode network (DMN) regions being disrupted (PCC
and precuneus) along with secondary visual areas. Additionally, when the
results of RH, TTP and FWHM were overlapped, we found common differences in PCC
as well as precuneus (see Fig.4). Earlier studies have reported neurochemical
alterations in these key areas [8, 9]. Taken together, these results
corroborate with earlier findings of disrupted neurochemistry, and show that
fMRI studies need to exercise caution in interpreting results arising from
these regions if, for example, they employ a canonical HRF.
Comparing all the three groups, we found
FWHM to be significantly different between all three groups in PCC and
precuneus (see Fig.5). This shows that the hemodynamic response in PCC and
precuneus are affected by both PTSD and mTBI. This is a substantial result
given that neural underpinnings of comorbid PTSD and mTBI are poorly understood
[10]. PCC and precuneus showed altered HRF between all three groups with all
the three HRF parameters.
In
summary, we showed that PTSD and mTBI cause overlapping and distinct HRF
alterations in subcortical structures and the DMN. Our findings also corroborate
with prior neurochemical findings. Given these findings, future studies on PTSD
and mTBI, and fMRI studies in general must exercise caution in interpreting
their results. We encourage researchers to employ hemodynamic deconvolution
during data pre-processing to mitigate the issue.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge financial support for this work from the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materials Command
(MRMC) (Grant # 00007218). The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in
this article are those of the authors and should
not be interpreted as representing the official views or policies,
either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Army or the Department of Defense
(DoD). The funders had no role in study design,
data collection and analysis, decision to
publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors thank the personnel at the TBI clinic and behavioral
health clinic, Fort Benning, GA, USA and the US Army Aeromedical Research
Laboratory, Fort Rucker, AL, USA, and most of all, the soldiers who
participated in the study.
References
[1] Handwerker
D.A. et al., Neuroimage,21(4):1639-51,2004
[2] Len et al.,
Physiology and functional imaging,31(2):85-93,2011
[3] Southwick
S.M. et al, Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry,4(4):242-8,1999
[4] Wu et al.,
Medical Image Analysis,17:365–374,2013
[5] Mifflin K.
et al., Modern Trends in Pharmacopsychiatry,30:94-102,2015
[6] Cohen C.H.,
The Annual Meeting of the Social and Affective Neuroscience Society, October
2009
[7] Nikolaus S.
et al., Reviews in the Neurosciences,21(2):119-39,2010
[8] Ramage A.E.
et al., Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Sept 2015 (in press)
[9] Rosso I.M.
et al., Depression and Anxiety,31(2):115-23,2014
[10] Simmons A.N.
et al., Neuropharmacology,62(2):598-606,2012