Hemodynamic Alterations in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Gopikrishna Deshpande1,2,3, D Rangaprakash1, Wenjing Yan1, Jeffrey S Katz1,2,3, Thomas S Denney1,2,3, and Michael N Dretsch4,5

1AU MRI Research Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States, 2Department of Psychology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States, 3Alabama Advanced Imaging Consortium, Auburn University and University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States, 4U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory, Fort Rucker, AL, United States, 5Human Dimension Division, HQ TRADOC, Fort Eustis, VA, United States

Synopsis

Functional MRI is an indirect measure of neural activity, as it is the convolution of the hemodynamic-response function (HRF) and a latent neural response. Recent studies show variance in HRF across brain regions and subjects. This raises the question of reliability of fMRI results if, for example, a canonical HRF is used in analysis. Using whole-brain resting-state fMRI, we employed blind hemodynamic deconvolution to estimate HRF parameters. We uncovered hemodynamic alterations in Soldiers with PTSD and mTBI, and found that certain subcortical and default-mode network regions showed significant alterations in HRF.

Introduction

Functional MRI (fMRI) is used extensively for studying neural correlates of brain functioning. FMRI is an indirect measure of neural activity as it measures changes in blood oxygenation level. Most fMRI studies assume a standard canonical hemodynamic response function (HRF) during analysis. However, recent advances show variability in HRF for different brain regions across subjects [1]. This challenges the interpretation of fMRI results since it is unclear if observed changes are due to neural activity or HRF variability. In this work, we identified HRF differences in Soldiers with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and postconcussion syndrome (PCS, chronic outcome associated with mild traumatic brain injury [mTBI]).

Recent evidences using Doppler ultrasound and infrared spectroscopy suggested alterations in cerebrovascular reactivity in mTBI [2]. Although neurochemical alterations in PTSD are well established [3], it is important to explore if these changes affect cerebrovascular reactivity. We hypothesized that the HRF, which depends on cerebrovascular reactivity and neurovascular coupling, may be altered in PTSD and mTBI. We tested the hypothesis by estimating the underlying HRF by performing blind hemodynamic deconvolution of resting-state fMRI data obtained from these populations.

Methods

Resting-state fMRI data was obtained from 87 male U.S. Army Soldiers (17 having PTSD, 42 having comorbid PTSD and PCS [PCS+PTSD] and 28 matched combat controls) in a 3T Siemens Verio scanner using T2*-weighted multiband-EPI sequence, with TR=600ms, TE=30ms, FA=55°, voxel size=3×3×5mm3, 2 sessions and 1000 volumes. Standard pre-processing was performed (realignment, normalization to MNI space, detrending, regressing out nuisance-covariates). Each voxel timeseries was then subjected to blind hemodynamic deconvolution; “blind” because it estimates both the HRF and underlying latent neuronal variables from just the observed fMRI data. We employed the deconvolution technique proposed by Wu et al. [4] which considers resting-state fMRI as a spontaneous pseudo-event-related signal and uses a variant of Weiner deconvolution. The HRF at each voxel in each subject was characterized by three parameters – response height (RH), time-to-peak (TTP), and full-width at half-wax (FWHM). Whole-brain two-sample t-tests were performed separately on the three parameters to obtain group-wise voxel-specific differences in HRF parameters (p<0.05, cluster-level thresholded at 400mm3, controlled for age, race, education and head-motion). This was done separately for the three pairwise comparisons between groups, and resulting binary maps were overlapped (with cluster-level threshold of 50mm3, in overlapped map) to obtain final maps.

Results and Discussion

In all the regions with altered HRF, we found that RH increased in the disorders compared to controls, while TTP and FWHM decreased in the disorders. This indicates that PTSD and PCS+PTSD are characterized by taller, quicker and narrower HRF in affected regions. We first elucidate the differences for Control vs Disease comparison, which refers to an overlap of Control vs PTSD and Control vs PCS+PTSD comparisons. Differences in RH were found in (see Fig.1) thalamus, midbrain, precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), secondary visual areas and parts of insula (anterior and posterior). Given that PTSD is an anxiety disorder, prior work shows abnormal GABAergic and glutamatergic systems relate to anxiety [5], with thalamus being anatomically well situated to produce the experience of anxiety [6], and serotonin in the midbrain playing a key role in anxiety disorders [7]. Further, alterations in TTP (Fig.2) and FWHM (Fig.3) largely overlapped, with key default-mode network (DMN) regions being disrupted (PCC and precuneus) along with secondary visual areas. Additionally, when the results of RH, TTP and FWHM were overlapped, we found common differences in PCC as well as precuneus (see Fig.4). Earlier studies have reported neurochemical alterations in these key areas [8, 9]. Taken together, these results corroborate with earlier findings of disrupted neurochemistry, and show that fMRI studies need to exercise caution in interpreting results arising from these regions if, for example, they employ a canonical HRF.

Comparing all the three groups, we found FWHM to be significantly different between all three groups in PCC and precuneus (see Fig.5). This shows that the hemodynamic response in PCC and precuneus are affected by both PTSD and mTBI. This is a substantial result given that neural underpinnings of comorbid PTSD and mTBI are poorly understood [10]. PCC and precuneus showed altered HRF between all three groups with all the three HRF parameters.

In summary, we showed that PTSD and mTBI cause overlapping and distinct HRF alterations in subcortical structures and the DMN. Our findings also corroborate with prior neurochemical findings. Given these findings, future studies on PTSD and mTBI, and fMRI studies in general must exercise caution in interpreting their results. We encourage researchers to employ hemodynamic deconvolution during data pre-processing to mitigate the issue.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge financial support for this work from the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materials Command (MRMC) (Grant # 00007218). The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this article are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official views or policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Army or the Department of Defense (DoD). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors thank the personnel at the TBI clinic and behavioral health clinic, Fort Benning, GA, USA and the US Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory, Fort Rucker, AL, USA, and most of all, the soldiers who participated in the study.

References

[1] Handwerker D.A. et al., Neuroimage,21(4):1639-51,2004

[2] Len et al., Physiology and functional imaging,31(2):85-93,2011

[3] Southwick S.M. et al, Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry,4(4):242-8,1999

[4] Wu et al., Medical Image Analysis,17:365–374,2013

[5] Mifflin K. et al., Modern Trends in Pharmacopsychiatry,30:94-102,2015

[6] Cohen C.H., The Annual Meeting of the Social and Affective Neuroscience Society, October 2009

[7] Nikolaus S. et al., Reviews in the Neurosciences,21(2):119-39,2010

[8] Ramage A.E. et al., Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Sept 2015 (in press)

[9] Rosso I.M. et al., Depression and Anxiety,31(2):115-23,2014

[10] Simmons A.N. et al., Neuropharmacology,62(2):598-606,2012

Figures

Fig.1. Regions with significantly altered response height (RH) in hemodynamic response function, HRF. They were significant for PTSD > Control and PCS+PTSD > Control comparisons. Thalamus, midbrain, insula, visual and default-mode network regions were altered. PCC = posterior-cingulate cortex.

Fig.2. Regions with significantly altered time-to-peak in HRF. They were significant for Control > PTSD and Control > PCS+PTSD comparisons. Visual and default-mode network regions were altered. PCC = Posterior-cingulate cortex.

Fig.3. Regions with significantly altered FWHM in HRF. They were significant Control > PTSD and Control > PCS+PTSD comparisons. Visual and default-mode network regions were altered. PCC = Posterior-cingulate cortex; IPL = inferior parietal lobule (angular gyrus).

Fig.4. Regions which had significant alterations in all three HRF parameters. They were significant for Control > PTSD and Control > PCS+PTSD comparisons. Posterior-cingulate cortex (PCC) and precuneus were identified.

Fig.5. Regions which were significantly different between all three groups, implying that both PTSD and mTBI caused alterations in them. This difference was observed only with FWHM. Posterior-cingulate cortex (PCC) and precuneus were identified.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0222