Convex Optimized Diffusion Encoding (CODE) Gradient Waveforms for Minimum TE and Bulk Motion Compensated Diffusion Weighted MRI
Eric Aliotta1,2, Holden H Wu1,2, and Daniel B Ennis1,2

1Radiological Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2Biomedical Physics IDP, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States

Synopsis

Spin-Echo EPI Diffusion Weighted MRI (SE-EPI DWI) typically uses a diffusion encoding gradient waveform with two identical gradients on either side of the 180° pulse which, in combination with the temporal footprint of the EPI readout results in sequence dead time. This dead time can be used for additional diffusion encoding which can, in turn, reduce TE and/or be used to null gradient moments for bulk motion compensated diffusion encoding. Convex Optimized Diffusion Encoding (CODE) was developed to minimize TE for DWI with and without motion compensation, implemented on a clinical scanner and tested in volunteers.

Purpose

To design and implement a minimum echo time (TE) Spin-Echo EPI Diffusion Weighted MRI (SE-EPI DWI) pulse sequence with or without bulk motion compensation using Convex Optimized Diffusion Encoding (CODE).

Introduction

SE-EPI DWI typically uses a diffusion encoding gradient waveform (GDiff) with two identical gradients on either side of the 180° pulse. The component of GDiff after the 180° in combination with the temporal footprint of the EPI readout results in dead time between the 90° and 180° pulses. This dead time can be used for additional diffusion encoding which can, in turn, reduce TE (improving SNR) and/or be used to null the first (velocity, M1=0) and/or second (acceleration, M2=0) gradient moments for bulk motion compensated diffusion encoding. The latter is critical for eliminating bulk motion artifacts in cardiac and abdominal DWI. The convex optimization framework for gradient waveform design[1, 2] was implemented to eliminate dead times and minimize TE for DWI with and without motion compensation.

Methods

Optimization - The GDiff that minimizes TE subject to hardware (GMax and SRMax), sequence (EPI duration), and diffusion encoding constraints (b-value, M0, M1, M2) was designed using the CODE framework for a target b-value (btarget) (Fig. 1). Optimizations were performed using the CPLEX linear solver (IBM, Armonk NY) with a gradient timestep (∆t) of 100µs.

Sequence Timing Comparison - To compare sequence timing with traditional DWI, diffusion encoding waveforms were generated using CODE for a range of b-values (100-1000s/mm2), and EPI readout durations (TEPI=20-120ms; corresponding to roughly 0.5-3.0mm in plane resolution. The designs used full Fourier (symmetric) k-space coverage, Gmax≤74mT/m, and SRmax≤50T/m/s along a single gradient axis (to limit PNS) for:

1. MONO (Monopolar, M0=0, Fig. 2A)

2. CODE (M0=0, Fig. 2B)

3. BIPOLAR (Bipolar, M0=M1=0 Fig. 2C)

4. CODE-M1 (CODE with M0=M1=0, Fig. 2D)

5. MOCO (Modified bipolar[3], M0=M1=M2=0, Fig. 2E)

6. CODE-M1M2 (CODE with M0=M1=M2=0, Fig. 2F).

Sequence Evaluation - CODE DWI was then implemented on a 3.0T clinical scanner (Siemens Prisma) for three applications:

1. CODE for neuro DWI with b=1000s/mm2 and 1.6x1.6x3mm spatial resolution

2. CODE-M1 for liver DWI with b=500s/mm2 and 2x2x7mm spatial resolution

3. CODE-M1M2 for cardiac DWI with b=350s/mm2 and 1.5x1.5x5mm spatial resolution.

The sequences were validated in a polyvinylpyrrolidone diffusion phantom (High Precision Devices, Boulder, CO) containing thirteen diffusivities. In vivo evaluation was performed in healthy volunteers (N=10 for each application) after obtaining informed consent. Conventional MONO DWI with matched sequence parameters were also acquired for comparison.

Results

CODE has shorter TEs than conventional encoding strategies over the entire range of b-values and EPI durations examined (Fig. 2). Phantom experiments showed excellent linear fits and correlation between ADC values reported by each CODE sequence with the corresponding MONO acquisitions (Table 1). The neuro CODE sequence reduced TE by 11% (75ms to 67ms), which resulted in DWI with higher apparent SNR than MONO (Fig. 3). CODE-M1 enabled velocity insensitive encoding for more homogeneous ADC maps in the liver (Fig. 4), a simultaneous 23% TE reduction compared to BIPOLAR encoding (72ms vs. 93ms) and only a 7% increase in TE compared to MONO (72ms vs. 67ms). CODE-M1M2 resulted in more robust cardiac DWI than MONO (Fig. 4) with only a 17% increase in TE (76ms vs. 65ms) and a 22% shorter TE than MOCO (76ms vs. 97ms).

Discussion

CODE shortened the TE in all cases examined compared to waveforms with equivalent moment nulling. The benefit was largest for motion compensated encoding (CODE-M1 and CODE-M1M2) and long EPI readouts (e.g high spatial resolution, full-Fourier imaging). Applications using partial Fourier imaging, large parallel imaging factors and/or coarse spatial resolutions will benefit less from the CODE framework. CODE may reduce the TE penalty for full Fourier imaging.

Our findings echo the results of previous studies in which: 1) M1 nulled bipolar encoding removed ADC heterogeneity caused by cardiac motion in the liver[4]; and 2) M1+M2 nulled encoding improved bulk motion robustness for cardiac DWI [3, 5]; but CODE resulted in shorter TEs than these existing methods. Eddy current induced distortions were not exacerbated with CODE.

Conclusion

The CODE framework shortened TEs for DWI with and without motion compensation for all b-values resulting in improved SNR and the potential for motion robustness with limited increases in TE.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Siemens Healthcare, the Department of Radiological Sciences at UCLA and the Graduate Program in Biosciences at UCLA.

References

1.Hargreaves BA, Nishimura DG, Conolly SM. Time-optimal multidimensional gradient waveform design for rapid imaging. MRM. 2004;51(1):81-92.

2. Middione MJ, Wu HH, Ennis DB. Convex gradient optimization for increased spatiotemporal resolution and improved accuracy in phase contrast MRI. MRM. 2014;72(6):1552-64.

3. Stoeck CT, von Deuster C, Genet M, Atkinson D, Kozerke S. Second-order motion-compensated spin echo diffusion tensor imaging of the human heart. MRM. 2015; doi: 10.1002/mrm.25784.

4. Ozaki M, Inoue Y, Miyati T, Hata H, Mizukami S, Komi S, et al. Motion artifact reduction of diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver: use of velocity-compensated diffusion gradients combined with tetrahedral gradients. JMRI. 2013;37(1):172-8.

5. Nguyen C, Fan Z, Sharif B, He Y, Dharmakumar R, Berman DS, et al. In vivo three-dimensional high resolution cardiac diffusion-weighted MRI: A motion compensated diffusion-prepared balanced steady-state free precession approach. MRM. 2013;72(5):1257-67.

Figures

Figure 1. Flowchart describing the Convex Optimized Diffusion Encoding (CODE) framework. The optimization involves maximizing b-value for an arbitrary gradient shape using a convex solver and modifying TE until the diffusion encoding gradient waveform, G(t), that minimizes TE for a target b-value (btarget) is determined.

Table 1: Linear fits and correlations between ADC measurements made in a diffusion phantom containing several diffusivities (nominal range: 0.3x10-3mm2/s to 2.1x10-3mm2/s) with conventional monopolar (MONO) SE-EPI DWI and optimized CODE DWI using non-motion compensated encoding (CODE), velocity compensated encoding (CODE-M1), and acceleration compensated encoding (CODE-M1M2). Excellent agreement was found between each of the CODE methods and MONO.

Figure 2. Minimum TE for a range of b-values and EPI readout durations (TEPI) using (A) conventional monopolar (MONO), BIPOLAR, or motion compensated (MOCO) diffusion encoding and (B) CODE, CODE-M1, and CODE-M1M2 gradient waveforms. (C) TE reduction (∆TE) achieved using the CODE framework. ∆TE increased with increasing TEPI and increasing b-value. Exemplary gradient waveforms for each case are shown in (D) and (E) with b=400s/mm2 and TEPI=50ms (~1.6x1.6mm spatial resolution).

Figure 3. (A) Axial neuro DWI and (B) ADC maps using MONO (left) and CODE (right) in a healthy volunteer. The reduction in TE permitted by CODE leads to higher SNR in the DWI at the same b-value (matched window/level) and leads to improved SNR in the CODE ADC map.

Figure 4. (A & B) Axial DWI (left) and ADC maps (right) in the liver of a healthy volunteer using MONO (A) and CODE-M1 (B) DWI. Cardiac motion leads to signal decay and elevated ADC with MONO, but velocity compensated CODE-M1 DWI leads to a more homogeneous ADC map. (C & D) Short axis cardiac DWI in a healthy volunteer acquired during early systole (left) and late diastole (right) using (C) MONO and (D) CODE-M1M2 encoding. CODE-M1M2 is less sensitive to cardiac phase than in MONO.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0211