Axel Joachim Krafft1,2,3, Simon Reiss2, Andreas Reichert2, Michael Vogele4, and Michael Bock2
1German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany, 2Radiology – Medical Physics, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, 3German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 4iSYS Medizintechnik GmbH, Kitzbuehel, Austria
Synopsis
Minimally
invasive interventions highly benefit from imaging guidance during instrument
positioning and monitoring of therapeutic progress. MRI with its unique
soft tissue contrast and ability for functional imaging is ideally suited for
interventional guidance. To enable and facilitate minimally invasive
interventions in closed-bore high-field MR systems with small bore diameters that
severely limit patient access, we propose a novel, versatile assistance system
in combination with passive instrument tracking. The system was studied in a systematic
phantom experiment during needle procedures, and a mean targeting accuracy of
less than 2 mm was achieved (mean procedure time: 6.5 min). Introduction
Minimally invasive
percutaneous interventions, such as needle biopsies, benefit from imaging
guidance during e.g. instrument positioning, monitoring of therapeutic
progress, and assessment of therapeutic outcome. MRI with its unparalleled soft
tissue contrast and ability for functional imaging would be ideally suited for
interventional guidance1, and closed-bore high-field MR systems would
be highly preferable to achieve optimal image quality. However, the magnet size
and the small bore diameters severely limit patient access.
Here, we
present the first accuracy evaluation of a novel small assistance system which
we combined with a passive tracking method for instrument positioning and alignment.
The system was studied in a phantom experiment to assess the theoretically
achievable accuracy in needle procedures.
Methods
The
assistance system (prototype, iSYS Medizintechnik GmbH, Kitzbuehel, Austria; Fig. 1)
consists of a gross-positioning platform with a rectangular opening for
instrument insertion and features a micro-manipulator with a distal instrument
holder. All components are constructed from MR-safe plastic materials. The
manipulator comprises two plates which can be manually positioned via
mechanical adjustment threads that are accessible through extension rods from
outside the magnet. Each plate can be moved in two translational degrees of freedom
(forward-backward – FB, left-right – LR). Manipulation of the lower plate moves
the entire unit in FB/LR direction relatively to the gross-positioning platform
(approximate translational range: 40×40 mm2). The upper plate can
only be moved in FB/LR direction relatively to the lower plate translating into
rotations of the instrument holder (approximate angular range ±30° in both
directions). The distal holder can be either equipped with a customized
cylindrical marker or a needle sleeve so that the marker’s symmetry axis is
aligned with the planned needle pathway. The passive marker (outer diameter:
15 mm) is filled with a contrast agent solution (Gd-DTPA/H2O
1:150) and automatically detected with a phase-only cross correlation (POCC)
tracking sequence2-4.
All
experiments were carried out in a 1.5T whole body system (bore size: 60 cm;
Siemens Symphony) using the system’s loop coil for signal reception. The setup
was tested during needle procedures (Fig. 2) in an agar phantom with
embedded fiducial targets (target number: 13, mean diameter: 8.1 mm,
distributed over approximately 50×50×40 mm3) which was placed
into a plastic casing mimicking the shape of a human torso (Fig. 1c). For
each target the following needle procedure was done:
(i) attachment of the marker to the instrument holder
at the manipulator’s center position,
(ii) instrument positioning under online guidance
with the POCC tracking sequence (tracking time: 1.9 s) until the planned needle
pathway was aligned with the target,
(iii) exchange of marker and needle sleeve,
(iv) insertion of a 16G needle (Somatex GmbH, Teltow,
Germany) into the target under online monitoring with a HASTE sequence (acquisition
time: 2.5 s),
(v) withdrawal of the needle and acquisition of a high-resolution
(0.5×0.5×0.5 mm3) 3D bSSFP data set to evaluate the needle
pathway.
The lateral
distance of the needle pathway to the geometric center of each target was measured
using reformatted multi-planar views of the bSSFP data (Fig. 3).
Results
Without
special training, all targets were successfully punctured without unintentional
perforating surrounding targets within a mean procedure time (duration for
instrument positioning, exchange of marker and needle sleeve, and needle
insertion) of about 6.5 minutes. Figure 2 exemplarily shows images
during instrument tracking, at the end of needle insertion, and after needle
withdrawal. The needle channels are clearly depicted in the post-insertion
images. A mean lateral distance of the needle channels to the target centers of
1.7±1.0 mm was found (cf. Table 1).
Discussion
& Conclusion
The novel
assistance system together with the passive tracking technique provided an
accurate and versatile setup for MR-guided needle interventions. Mean
procedural duration (6.5 min) and accuracy (1.7 mm) were comparable to
previous studies2-4, which was sufficient to reliably puncture target
structures with sizes of about 8 mm.
Compared to other
assistance systems, the setup in its current implementation appeals as simple and
accurate but could be expanded in future e.g. with more advanced robotic technologies.5-7
With its flexible design, it is not restricted to single interventional
scenarios and could be used in many abdominal applications, e.g. transgluteal
prostate biopsies8. The main components are reusable and only small
parts (distal holder, marker, instruments) are intended as sterile disposables
which might be important for clinical applicability. Besides parameter optimization,
e.g. temporal resolution of the POCC sequence, future work will focus on in vivo testing and integration of a
dedicated RF coil. Based on our preliminary work, the system demonstrates its
potential as an accurate and versatile in MR-guided interventions.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. Florian Maier (German Cancer
Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany) for support with the
implementation of the tracking sequence. Non-financial research support from
iSys Medizintechnik GmbH (Kitzbuehel, Austria) is also acknowledged.References
1. Weiss CR, Nour SG, Lewin JS. MR-guided biopsy: A review of current
techniques and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;27:311-325.
2. de Oliveira A, Rauschenberg J, Beyersdorff D, et al. Automatic
passive tracking of an endorectal prostate biopsy device using phase-only
cross-correlation. Magn Reson Med.
2008;59:1043-1050.
3. Krafft AJ, Zamecnik P,
Maier F, et al. Passive marker tracking via phase-only cross correlation
(POCC) for MR-guided needle interventions: Initial in vivo experience. Phys Medica. 2013;29:607-614.
4. Zamecnik P, Schouten MG,
Krafft AJ, et al. Automated real-time needle-guide tracking for fast 3-T
MR-guided transrectal prostate biopsy: a feasibility study. Radiology. 2014;273;879-886.
5. Melzer A, Gutmann B,
Remmele T, et al. INNOMOTION for percutaneous image-guided
interventions: principles and evaluation of this MR- and CT-compatible robotic
system. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag.
2008;27:66-73.
6. Schouten MG, Ansems J, Renema WK, et al. The accuracy and safety
aspects of a novel robotic needle guide manipulator to perform transrectal
prostate biopsies. Med Phys. 2010;37:4744-4750.
7. Krieger A, Susil RC, Ménard C, et al. Design of a novel MRI
compatible manipulator for image guided prostate interventions. IEEE Trans
Biomed Eng. 2005;52:306-313.
8. Bodelle B, Naguib NN, Schulz B, et al. 1.5-T magnetic
resonance-guided transgluteal biopsies of the prostate in patients with
clinically suspected prostate cancer: technique and feasibility. Invest Radiol.
2013;48:458-463.