An MR-compatible Assistance System for MR-guided Needle Interventions: Initial Phantom Evaluation
Axel Joachim Krafft1,2,3, Simon Reiss2, Andreas Reichert2, Michael Vogele4, and Michael Bock2

1German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany, 2Radiology – Medical Physics, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, 3German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 4iSYS Medizintechnik GmbH, Kitzbuehel, Austria

Synopsis

Minimally invasive interventions highly benefit from imaging guidance during instrument positioning and monitoring of therapeutic progress. MRI with its unique soft tissue contrast and ability for functional imaging is ideally suited for interventional guidance. To enable and facilitate minimally invasive interventions in closed-bore high-field MR systems with small bore diameters that severely limit patient access, we propose a novel, versatile assistance system in combination with passive instrument tracking. The system was studied in a systematic phantom experiment during needle procedures, and a mean targeting accuracy of less than 2 mm was achieved (mean procedure time: 6.5 min).

Introduction

Minimally invasive percutaneous interventions, such as needle biopsies, benefit from imaging guidance during e.g. instrument positioning, monitoring of therapeutic progress, and assessment of therapeutic outcome. MRI with its unparalleled soft tissue contrast and ability for functional imaging would be ideally suited for interventional guidance1, and closed-bore high-field MR systems would be highly preferable to achieve optimal image quality. However, the magnet size and the small bore diameters severely limit patient access.

Here, we present the first accuracy evaluation of a novel small assistance system which we combined with a passive tracking method for instrument positioning and alignment. The system was studied in a phantom experiment to assess the theoretically achievable accuracy in needle procedures.

Methods

The assistance system (prototype, iSYS Medizintechnik GmbH, Kitzbuehel, Austria; Fig. 1) consists of a gross-positioning platform with a rectangular opening for instrument insertion and features a micro-manipulator with a distal instrument holder. All components are constructed from MR-safe plastic materials. The manipulator comprises two plates which can be manually positioned via mechanical adjustment threads that are accessible through extension rods from outside the magnet. Each plate can be moved in two translational degrees of freedom (forward-backward – FB, left-right – LR). Manipulation of the lower plate moves the entire unit in FB/LR direction relatively to the gross-positioning platform (approximate translational range: 40×40 mm2). The upper plate can only be moved in FB/LR direction relatively to the lower plate translating into rotations of the instrument holder (approximate angular range ±30° in both directions). The distal holder can be either equipped with a customized cylindrical marker or a needle sleeve so that the marker’s symmetry axis is aligned with the planned needle pathway. The passive marker (outer diameter: 15 mm) is filled with a contrast agent solution (Gd-DTPA/H2O 1:150) and automatically detected with a phase-only cross correlation (POCC) tracking sequence2-4.

All experiments were carried out in a 1.5T whole body system (bore size: 60 cm; Siemens Symphony) using the system’s loop coil for signal reception. The setup was tested during needle procedures (Fig. 2) in an agar phantom with embedded fiducial targets (target number: 13, mean diameter: 8.1 mm, distributed over approximately 50×50×40 mm3) which was placed into a plastic casing mimicking the shape of a human torso (Fig. 1c). For each target the following needle procedure was done:
(i) attachment of the marker to the instrument holder at the manipulator’s center position,
(ii) instrument positioning under online guidance with the POCC tracking sequence (tracking time: 1.9 s) until the planned needle pathway was aligned with the target,
(iii) exchange of marker and needle sleeve,
(iv) insertion of a 16G needle (Somatex GmbH, Teltow, Germany) into the target under online monitoring with a HASTE sequence (acquisition time: 2.5 s),
(v) withdrawal of the needle and acquisition of a high-resolution (0.5×0.5×0.5 mm3) 3D bSSFP data set to evaluate the needle pathway.
The lateral distance of the needle pathway to the geometric center of each target was measured using reformatted multi-planar views of the bSSFP data (Fig. 3).

Results

Without special training, all targets were successfully punctured without unintentional perforating surrounding targets within a mean procedure time (duration for instrument positioning, exchange of marker and needle sleeve, and needle insertion) of about 6.5 minutes. Figure 2 exemplarily shows images during instrument tracking, at the end of needle insertion, and after needle withdrawal. The needle channels are clearly depicted in the post-insertion images. A mean lateral distance of the needle channels to the target centers of 1.7±1.0 mm was found (cf. Table 1).

Discussion & Conclusion

The novel assistance system together with the passive tracking technique provided an accurate and versatile setup for MR-guided needle interventions. Mean procedural duration (6.5 min) and accuracy (1.7 mm) were comparable to previous studies2-4, which was sufficient to reliably puncture target structures with sizes of about 8 mm.

Compared to other assistance systems, the setup in its current implementation appeals as simple and accurate but could be expanded in future e.g. with more advanced robotic technologies.5-7 With its flexible design, it is not restricted to single interventional scenarios and could be used in many abdominal applications, e.g. transgluteal prostate biopsies8. The main components are reusable and only small parts (distal holder, marker, instruments) are intended as sterile disposables which might be important for clinical applicability. Besides parameter optimization, e.g. temporal resolution of the POCC sequence, future work will focus on in vivo testing and integration of a dedicated RF coil. Based on our preliminary work, the system demonstrates its potential as an accurate and versatile in MR-guided interventions.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Florian Maier (German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany) for support with the implementation of the tracking sequence. Non-financial research support from iSys Medizintechnik GmbH (Kitzbuehel, Austria) is also acknowledged.

References

1. Weiss CR, Nour SG, Lewin JS. MR-guided biopsy: A review of current techniques and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;27:311-325.

2. de Oliveira A, Rauschenberg J, Beyersdorff D, et al. Automatic passive tracking of an endorectal prostate biopsy device using phase-only cross-correlation. Magn Reson Med. 2008;59:1043-1050.

3. Krafft AJ, Zamecnik P, Maier F, et al. Passive marker tracking via phase-only cross correlation (POCC) for MR-guided needle interventions: Initial in vivo experience. Phys Medica. 2013;29:607-614.

4. Zamecnik P, Schouten MG, Krafft AJ, et al. Automated real-time needle-guide tracking for fast 3-T MR-guided transrectal prostate biopsy: a feasibility study. Radiology. 2014;273;879-886.

5. Melzer A, Gutmann B, Remmele T, et al. INNOMOTION for percutaneous image-guided interventions: principles and evaluation of this MR- and CT-compatible robotic system. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2008;27:66-73.

6. Schouten MG, Ansems J, Renema WK, et al. The accuracy and safety aspects of a novel robotic needle guide manipulator to perform transrectal prostate biopsies. Med Phys. 2010;37:4744-4750.

7. Krieger A, Susil RC, Ménard C, et al. Design of a novel MRI compatible manipulator for image guided prostate interventions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005;52:306-313.

8. Bodelle B, Naguib NN, Schulz B, et al. 1.5-T magnetic resonance-guided transgluteal biopsies of the prostate in patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: technique and feasibility. Invest Radiol. 2013;48:458-463.

Figures

Figure 1: (a) Schematic of micro-manipulator and (b) distal instrument holder (yellow arrows) with passive marker attached. (c) Assistance system mounted to plastic casing with circular hole (green solid line) below which the phantom was placed. Green dotted line indicates platform opening for instrument insertion. Red/blue arrows point to extension rods for manipulation of upper/lower plate.

Figure 2: (a,b) Orthogonal images of tracking sequence at end of instrument positioning. Green dotted line represents planned needle pathway. (c) HASTE image with scan plane identical to (b) after needle insertion. (d) Needle channel (orange arrows) and fiducial target (green arrow) in high-resolution 3D bSSFP data after needle withdrawal.

Figure 3: Reformatted multi-planar views of high-resolution 3D bSSFP data for measurements of lateral distance of needle channel to geometric center of target. Please note that for illustration purposes the sectional image shown in (c) was 4-fold magnified compared to the ones shown in (a) and (b).

Table 1: Summary of diameter, depth from surface of phantom, angles of needle pathway in FB and LR direction, duration (procedure time for instrument positioning and needle insertion), and lateral distance of needle pathway to target center for all 13 targets. Bottom line: respective mean values and standard deviation (SD).



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0203