Nicolas G.R. Behl1, Armin M. Nagel1,2, Erik N.K. Cressman3, Reiner Umathum1, David Fuentes4, R. Jason Stafford4, Peter Bachert1, Mark E. Ladd1, and Florian Maier1
1Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 2Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany, 3Interventional Radiology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States, 4Imaging Physics, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
Synopsis
Thermochemical ablation (TCA) is a novel minimally
invasive ablation approach. Acetic acid and sodium hydroxide are
injected simultaneously and mix and react directly before entering the tissue.
The exothermal reaction releases heat that is used for thermal ablation. For a detailed characterization of TCA injection,
4D 23Na-data with reasonable temporal resolution are required. In this work, a compressed sensing approach was applied to acquire 4D 23Na-data of injections with high spatial and
good temporal resolution.Purpose
Thermochemical ablation (TCA) is a novel minimally-invasive
ablation approach
1. Acetic acid and sodium hydroxide are injected
simultaneously, mixing and reacting directly before entering the tissue. The
exothermal reaction releases heat that is used for thermal ablation.
Additionally, the reaction product sodium acetate (NaOAc) creates a
hyperosmolar area at the target site.
Recently,
23Na MRI was used to assess sodium acetate distributions
after injection
2. However, for more detailed characterization of TCA
injection, 4D data with reasonable temporal resolution are required. In this
work, a compressed sensing
3 approach was applied to acquire 4D data
of injections with high spatial and good temporal resolution.
Methods
Experiments were performed on a 7T whole-body MR
system (Magnetom 7T, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). A
double-resonant (1H: 297.2 MHz; 23Na: 78.6 MHz) quadrature birdcage coil (Rapid
Biomed, Rimpar, Germany) was used. The data were acquired with a 3D density
adapted radial sampling pattern4 with a golden angle distribution of
the projections5.
An ex vivo bovine liver was embedded into
agarose gel next to a reference tube with NaOAc solution (2.5 M). During the
experiment, NaOAc solution (3 ml, 2.5 M) was injected into the liver through a
20 G angio catheter (B. Braun Melsungen, Melsungen, Germany) using an MR
contrast agent injector (Accutron Injector MR, Medtron, Saarbrücken, Germany).
During and after the
injection experiment, two datasets (DSinjection, DSpost-injection)
with a total number of 50,000 projections each were acquired. Subsets of DSinjection
with 2500 projections were used for the reconstruction of each time frame,
resulting in a temporal resolution of Taq=1.04min and an
undersampling factor USF≈28. The data subsets were interleaved so that a new
timeframe begins every 1250 projections (31.25sec).
The data were
reconstructed with Nonuniform Fast Fourier Transform (NUFFT)6
and iterative 3D-Dictionary-Learning Compressed Sensing reconstruction
(3D-DLCS)7. In the 3D-DLCS reconstruction, an adaptive dictionary
consisting of D=300 three-dimensional blocks of size B=3×3×3
pixels was used; the dictionary is initialized with an overcomplete discrete
cosine transform and updated in each iteration step with the
k-singular-value-decompositions algorithm8,9.
The reconstruction was evaluated with simulated data
DSsimulated obtained from DSpost-injection. A dataset
containing 2500 projections was created with added Gaussian noise to achieve a
SNR similar to the measurements. Mean normalized signal intensity relative to
the reference tube within a region-of-interest (ROI) and peak signal-to-noise
ratio (PSNR) were computed for the NUFFT and the 3D-DLCS reconstructions. The
reconstructions were performed on a standalone
desktop PC (Intel Core i7-2600 CPU, 3.4 GHz, 16 GB memory)
Results
The 3D-DLCS reconstructions of both the simulated
data (DS
simulated) and acquired (DS
injection) data show a
strong reduction of noise when compared with the corresponding NUFFT
reconstructions. Most notably, low intensity regions that are not recovered in
the NUFFT reconstruction become discernable in the 3D-DLCS reconstruction (arrows
in Fig. 2). However, slight blurring can be seen when compared to the ground
truth. For the 3D-DLCS reconstruction, the PSNR is improved by 18.6dB and the
mean intensity within the ROI delineated in Fig. 1a is much closer to the value
from the ground truth (see Table 1). The 3D-DLCS reconstruction of each time
frame in the dynamic dataset (DS
injection) took less than 10min,
resulting in a total reconstruction time of 6.5h for all 39 time frames.
Discussion & Conclusion
The very sparse nature of the sodium images from
the TCA experiment make it well suited for Compressed Sensing based
reconstructions such as the 3D-DLCS algorithm. Because the
23Na
concentrations to be measured are much higher compared to physiological
concentrations in tissue, relatively high undersampling can be used without
having to acquire multiple averages. The strong reduction of artifacts in the
3D-DLCS reconstruction compared to NUFFT with such a high undersampling factor
(USF = 28) is feasible because few entries from the dictionary are needed in
order to represent each block of the image. Our work indicates that 4D sodium
imaging can be employed to characterize TCA procedures retrospectively.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Barbara Dillenberger for her
support. This work was funded by the Helmholtz Alliance ICEMED
- Imaging and Curing Environmental Metabolic Diseases, through the Initiative
and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association.References
[1] Cressman ENK et al., Int J Hyperthermia (2010) 26(4): 327-337.[2] Maier F et al., Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med.
(2015) 23: 4147.[3] Lustig M et al., Magn Reson Med (2007) 6:1182-95.
[4] Nagel et al., Magn Reson Med. (2009) 62:1565-73.
[5] Chan et al., Magn Reson Med. (2009) 61 :354-63.
[6] Fessler et al., Trans. Signal Process. (2003) 2 :560-74.
[7] Behl et al., Magn Reson Med. 2015 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25759.
[8] Aharonet al., IEEE Trans Signal Process. (2006) 54:4311-4322
[9] Rubinstein et al., CS Technion. (2008) 40.