Multi-modal MRI Parametric Maps Combined with Receptor Information to Optimize Prediction of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
Hakmook Kang1,2, Allison Hainline1, Xia Li3, Lori R. Arlinghaus4, Vandana G. Abramson5,6, A. Bapsi Chakravarthy5,7, Brian Bingham8, and Thomas E. Yankeelov2,4,5,9

1Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 2Center for Quantitative Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 3GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY, United States, 4Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 5Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 6Medical Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 7Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 8School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 9Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States

Synopsis

Pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used as a short term surrogate marker of ultimate outcome in patients with breast cancer. Current imaging tools are suboptimal in predicting this response. Analyzing voxel-level heterogeneity in multi-modal MRI maps in conjunction with receptor status data, i.e., DCE- and DW-MRI, and ER/PR/HER2 status, allows us to improve the predictive power after the first cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the ability of multivariate penalized regression models with tumor grade, age, receptor status and DCE- and DW-MRI parametric maps, obtained early in the course of therapy, to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) status at the time of surgery.

METHODS

DCE- and DW-MRI data were collected (3.0T MR scanner, Philips Healthcare, The Netherlands) before and after the first cycle of NAC from thirty-three patients with Stage II or III breast cancer who participated in an IRB-approved clinical trial. Details on data acquisition and longitudinal registration of DCE- and DW-MRI parametric maps can be found elsewhere1. Pathological complete responses were confirmed at the time of surgery. There were 12 patients with pCR and 21 who had residual disease at surgery. Voxel-based information of the efflux rate constant Kep from the DCE-MRI and apparent diffusion coefficient ADC from the DW-MRI was extracted via the redundancy analysis in which the most uncorrelated percentiles of Kep and ADC values were chosen after fitting a series of multiple linear regression models for those voxels with increase in Kep and decrease in ADC, respectively, from pre- to post-NAC2. Logistic regression with ridge penalty was employed to accommodate a large number of predictors (e.g., voxel-level Kep and ADC) compared to our sample size (n=33). The performance of the full model, i.e., voxel-level Kep & ADC, the receptor status, age, and tumor grade (VRC model), was compared to the same model without the receptors’ status (VC model) in terms of overfitting-corrected3 AUC and Brier score that measures the accuracy of prediction. For comparison, the prediction power of the conventional measure RECIST (RC model) was also assessed. The statistical significance of the difference in overfitting-corrected AUCs and Brier scores was investigated by generating a bootstrap distribution of the difference with 300 replicates.

RESULTS

In Table 1, the overfitting-corrected AUCs and Brier scores resulted from the three logistic ridge regression models are reported along with the corresponding 95% CIs. The overfitting-corrected AUC resulted from VRC model outperforms the other two models, i.e., VC and RC models. Moreover, VRC model achieves the smallest overfitting-corrected Brier score, indicating that VRC model outperforms the others. The differences in overfitting-corrected AUCs between VRC and VC, and between VRC and RC model are illustrated in Figure 1. The shaded area 0.057 and 0.05 in Figure 1 indicates how overfitting-corrected AUC resulted from VRC is smaller than that from VC and RC, respectively. The shaded area 0.097 and 0.053 in Figure 2 indicate how the overfitting-corrected Brier score resulted from VCR is larger than that from VC and RC, respectively. Although the 95% CI on each overfitting-corrected statistics is not statistically significant, Figure 1 and 2 strongly support that the overfitting-corrected AUC and Brier score of VRC are likely to outperform the corresponding statistics based on VC and RC model.

CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION

The study supports incorporating voxel-level information along with hormone receptor information, to improve the ability to predict treatment response for breast cancer patients using early imaging time points.

Acknowledgements

NCI 1R01CA129961, NCI 1U01CA142565, NCI 1P50 098131, NCI P30 CA68485, NCRR/NIH UL1 RR024975-01.

References

1. Li X, et al. Invest Radiol 2014; 50(4):195-204.

2. Li X, et al. Transl Oncol 2014; 7(1): 14-22.

3. Harrell F, 2010; Ch.5 in Regression Modeling Strategies, New York, NY: Springer.

Figures

Difference in overfitting-corrected AUCs (a) between model with and without receptor data and (b) between model with receptor data and model with RECIST. The area value (i.e., 0.057 and 0.05) in each plot indicates how likely the overfitting-corrected AUC based on the model with receptor data is smaller than its competing model.

Difference in overfitting-corrected Brier scores (a) between model with and without receptor data and (b) between model with receptor data and model with RECIST. The area value (i.e., 0.097 and 0.053) in each plot indicates how likely the overfitting-corrected Brier score based on the model with receptor data is larger than its competing model.

Table 1. Overfitting-corrected AUC and Brier scores resulted from (a) model with voxel-based information, receptor information, and clinical data, (b) the same model without receptor information, and (c) model with RECIST and clinical data are reported along with the bootstrap 95% CIs.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0184