Stephan Orzada1, Andreas K. Bitz2, Oliver Kraff1, Mark Oehmigen1,3, Marcel Gratz1,3, Sören Johst1, Maximilian N. Völker1, Stefan H. G. Rietsch1,3, Martina Flöser2, Thomas Fiedler2, Samaneh Shooshtary4, Klaus Solbach4, Harald H. Quick1,3, and Mark E. Ladd1,2
1Erwin L. Hahn Institute for MRI, Essen, Germany, 2Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 3High Field and Hybrid MR Imaging, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany, 4High Frequency Technology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
Synopsis
Due
to the severe problems with B1 inhomogeneity, volume resonators are not a good
choice for body applications at ultra-high fields, and local multi-channel
arrays are commonly used for transmission. In this work we present an
integrated 32ch transmit/receive body array for 7 Tesla whole-body imaging. First
in vivo images show a human volunteer imaged completely in 4 stations.Introduction
In contrast
to lower field strengths, MRI systems at high field strengths of 7 Tesla and
above are not equipped with an integrated body transmit coil. Due to the severe
problems with B1 inhomogeneity, volume resonators are not a good choice for
body applications at ultra-high fields, and local multi-channel arrays are
commonly used for transmission. In this work we present a 32-channel
transmit/receive body array for 7 Tesla integrated between the bore liner and the gradient
coil.
Methods
Figure
1a shows the array, which consists of 32 micro strip line elements with
meanders arranged in 3 interleaved rings. The inner ring consists of 12
elements, while the outer rings consist of 10 elements each. The mechanical
structure is made of a rigid polycarbonate frame (Fig. 1b) onto which the PCBs
are glued. The front PCBs with the micro strip structure are 0.8 mm RO4003
boards with a length of 25 cm, while the ground plane is made from
0.127 mm RO3010 with 18 µm copper plating on both sides. The ground plane
is slotted to reduce eddy currents induced by the gradient coil, the slots
being place in such a way that the resulting copper strips on the front and the
backside overlap. In this way, lumped capacitors only had to be used at the
connection points of the end-capacitors. The overall length of the ground plane
is 60 cm. The arrangement of the elements can be seen in Fig. 1c, where
one half of the array is shown from the inside. The array is divided into an
upper and a lower half to ease maintenance. The distance between head-on
elements is 5 cm. The width of the front side PCBs is 86 mm.
All
elements are connected to custom-built T/R switches1 with an
appropriate length of low-loss cable (Aircell 5, SSB Electronic GmbH, Lippstadt
Germany) to ensure pre-amp decoupling. Detuning of the elements is performed
with dedicated detuning boards containing PIN diodes that produce an RF short
circuit of the transmit cable to ground when a forward current is applied.
While side-by-side
neighboring micro strip lines with meanders are intrinsically well decoupled2,
they couple strongly when placed head-to-head or when they are next to each
other but shifted in the longitudinal direction. Thus, decoupling networks were
used to decrease coupling between some of the neighboring elements. Fig. 2
shows a schematic of the elements including the decoupling networks with the
values of the lumped elements. There are 50 of these networks for the complete
array. The connecting lines are semi-rigid cables (Huber+Suhner AG, Herisau,
Swiss). There are no decoupling networks connecting the two halves of the array,
where the adjoining elements are side-by-side.
To enable
usage of the 32ch array together with local receive coils, a custom built
PIN-diode controller was used to provide forward current and reverse voltage
for the PIN diodes, and the receive chain of the MRI system was extended with
32ch switches and a 32ch 2nd-stage receive amplifier with bias tees
for power supply of the pre-amps3.
A custom-built 32ch pTx system including custom
RF amplifiers and RF modulators was used to drive the array during transmit.
Results
The highest
coupling between elements occurs where the two halves of the array connect.
Here the coupling is -14 dB when loaded with a volunteer centered on the
abdominal region.
Figure 3
shows the noise correlation for the array. Overall noise correlation is low; the
maximum value is 22%. This value occurs between the elements that border the
array halves.
Figure 4 is
a table of the in vivo g-factors in an axial slice through the abdomen of a
male volunteer (1.72m, 65kg), showing the means as well as maximums.
Figure 5 shows the first in vivo dataset. The entire
body is covered in 4 stations. The images appear fairly homogeneous over a
500mm field-of-view.
Discussion
The g-factors
are quite high for an array with 32 channels. The reason for this is most
probably the large distance between the array elements and the body, leading to
high correlations between the sensitivities of the elements. To enhance the
receive performance, a dedicated receive array could be used, which is feasible
since the changes in the receive chain allow for computer-controlled switching
between reception with the body array or a local receive array.
Conclusion
First
tests with the presented 32ch array show promising results. The entire body of
a human volunteer could be covered quite uniformly in only 4 stations.
Acknowledgements
The
research leading to these results has received funding from the European
Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme
(FP/2007-2013) / ERC Grant Agreement n. 291903 MRexcite.References
1. Watkins
RD, Caverly RH, Doherty WE. 298MHz Micro miniature 2KW Transmit Receive Switch
for 7.0 Tesla TR Arrays. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2012; 20:2686.
2. Rietsch
SHG, Quick HH, Orzada S. Impact of different meander sizes on the RF transmit
performance and coupling of microstrip line elements at 7 T. Med Phys 2015; 42
(8).
3. Orzada S, Bitz AK, Solbach K, Ladd ME. A
Receive Chain Add-On for Implementation of a 32-Channel Integrated Tx/Rx Body
Coil and Use of Local Receive Arrays at 7 Tesla. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med
2015; 23:3134.