Jeong Hee Yoon1, Jeong Min Lee1, Eun Ju Kim2, Tomoyuki Okuaki3, and Joon Koo Han1
1Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 2Philips Healthcare, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 3Philips Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan
Synopsis
Liver signal intensity on hepatobiliary phase at
gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI has been reported to be useful to estimate
global and regional liver function quantitatively. However, simple MR signal
measurement is often suffering from its sensitivity of MR field inhomogeneity
and non-linear relationship with contrast medium concentration. Herein, we investigated
of B1 correction effect on T1 map and compared its diagnostic performance to
assess liver function according to Child-Pugh classification. In addition, we
attempted to investigate risk assessment capability of B1 corrected T1 map for long-term
clinical outcome in patients with cirrhosis.Purpose
To determine whether gadoxetic acid-enhanced B1
corrected volumetric T1 map of the liver is able to demonstrate global liver
function and functional heterogeneity in patients with liver cirrhosis, and to contribute
to estimate the risk of with development of hepatic insufficiency or
decompensation.
Methods
In this Institutional
Review Board approved retrospective study, 234 consecutive patients (M:F=179:55)
who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including
B1 corrected volumetric T1 map at 3T were included. The requirement of informed
consent was waived. Patients were chronic liver disease (n=9), Child-Pugh
classification A (n=198) and B (n=28) based on typical cross-sectional or
ultrasound features and clinical findings.
Image acquisition— Volumetric B1 and T1 maps were
obtained ten minutes after standard dose of gadoxetic acid (0.025mmol/kg) was
injected intravenously. For obtaining B1 field map, double-angle method using
two-dimensional (2D) turbo spin echo imaging (1) was acquired by applying
following parameters: TR/TE, 771/40msec; and FA, 130º and 260 º. For T1 map,
multi-slice, three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted fast field echo with variable
flip angle method (2), using following scan parameter: T1 map: TR, 9msec; FA, 5º
and 29º; and slice thickness 8-10mm with inter slice gap of 8mm. FAs were
determined by reported T1 relxation time of the liver (T1liver) at
3T (3, 4) and our preliminary phantom study. In both maps, field of view (300~350),
number of excitation (1.0), matrix (128x98~128x128) and slice thickness were
identical in a patient. A total of 10 slices were obtained in a breath-hold for
each map.
Data analysis—T1 relaxation time of the liver (T1liver) and
liver volume was measured at MR. T1liver with and without B1
correction were compared by using paired t-test. In addition, diagnostic
performance to differentiate Child-Pugh class B from class A was compared
between B1 corrected T1liver and uncorrected T1liver. B1
corrected T1liver, functional liver volume-to-weight ratio, which is
liver volume divided by B1 corrected T1liver and patient’s weight, were
compared between Child-Pugh A and B patients. The associations with serum
markers (albumin, total bilirubin, prothrombin time), B1 corrected T1liver,
functional liver volume-to-weight ratio, hepatic insufficiency and hepatic decompensation
were investigated by using Cox proportional hazards analysis. In addition, we
classified the patients into two groups based on criterion of albumin level of <3.5g/dL
according to Child-Pugh classification, <4g/dL (5) and ≥462msec
of T1liver, which was average value in patients with portal
hypertension in previous study results using modified look-locker method (6). Heterogeneity of regional
liver function was assessed by using kurtosis of T1liver.
Results and Discussion
Effect of B1 correction—Median, kurtosis and skewness of T1liver
were significantly different before and after B1 correction (Table 1, Fig.
1, P <0.0001). Median T1liver
was significantly higher after B1 correction and showed higher kurtosis in the
whole liver as well as in each lobe (Table 1, P <0.0001).
Performance of B1 corrected T1 map in comparison with
categorical liver function —Compared with patients with Child-Pugh A, patients with
Child-Pugh B showed significantly higher T1liver (Table 2, 372.2 ±
77.5 vs. 548.2 ± 257.7, P<0.0001)
and lower kurtosis of T1liver (29.1 ± 39.6
vs. 43.9 ± 64.9, P= 0.016). According
to ROC analysis, B1 corrected T1liver showed significantly better
diagnostic performance for distinguishing patients with Child B from Child A
than uncorrected T1liver (Fig. 2, area under the curve [AUC], 0.78 [95%
CI: 0.72-0.83] vs. AUC, 0.66 [95% CI: 0.60-0.72], P= 0.001).
Long-term clinical outcome and B1 corrected T1liver
— After a
median follow-up of 16.2 months (range: 4.1months, 27.8
months), 10.7% of patients (25/234; M:F = 19:6, mean age 64.7 ± 8.8 years) developed
hepatic insufficiency:
hepatic encephalopathy (n=9); death due to hepatic insufficiency (n=8);
intractable ascites (n=6); and intractable itching sense due to
hyperbilirubinemia, which was treated by transplantation (n=1). According to
multivariate analyses, albumin <3.5g/dL (HR, 20.71 [3.9, 221.9]) and B1 corrected T1liver
≥462msec (HR, 5.9 [1.1, 62.8]) were significantly associated with development
of hepatic insufficiency. In addition, six out of 207 patients with Child A
class (2.9%) developed hepatic decompensation. Functional liver volume-to weight
ratio was associated with development of hepatic decompensation in patients
with Child-Pugh A (Table 3, HR, 0.03 [95% CI: 0.004, 0.23]), after the
amendment of albumin and B1 corrected T1liver.
Conclusion
B1
inhomogeneity corrected volumetric T1 mapping was able to provide global liver
function and demonstrate heterogeneity of regional liver function. B1 corrected T1liver
≥462msec was independently associated with the development of hepatic
insufficiency. Functional liver volume-to-weight ratio may be related with
development of decompensation in compensated liver cirrhosis patients.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1) Cunningham et al, MRM
2006;55(6):1236-33; 2) Treier et al, MRM 2007; 57(3):568-76; 3) Radiology 2004;
230(3): 652-9; 4) Deoni et al, MRM 2003; 49(3):515-26; 5) Ripoll et al, Journal
of Clinical Radiology 2015;49:613-9; 6) Yoon et al, Eur Radiol 2015 doi:
10.1007/s00330-015-3994-7