Brain phospholipid and energy metabolism in mild Alzheimer’s disease and healthy aging: a 31P Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy study
Anne Rijpma1,2, Marinette van der Graaf3,4, Olga Meulenbroek1,2, Marcel Olde Rikkert1,2, and Arend Heerschap3

1Geriatric Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2Radboud Alzheimer Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 3Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 4Paediatrics, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Synopsis

In this study we assessed phospholipid and energy metabolism in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease and healthy age-matched control subjects by 3D 31P MRS imaging. Four brain regions were investigated: left and right hippocampus, anterior cingulate cortex, and retrosplenial cortex. Disease specific differences as well as differences between brain regions were found.

Background

In vivo studies in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) have shown reduced glucose uptake in the retrosplenial cortex (RSC), as measured by FDG-PET1, and altered resting state activity in the default mode network of the RSC, mediotemporal and frontal brain regions, as measured by fMRI2. Additionally, post-mortem and in vitro studies indicate alterations in membrane phospholipid metabolism3 as well as in basic energy mechanisms (e.g. creatine kinase (CK) activity4) in AD patients. Both phospholipid and energy metabolism can be investigated in vivo by phosphorus MR Spectrocopy (31P MRS). Previous 31P MRS studies5,6,7 have so far provided inconclusive results, due to variation in disease stage and medication status of AD patients, and differences in investigated brain regions and control groups. In addition, these studies were often hampered by low spectral resolution and small sample sizes.

Purpose

To assess phospholipid and energy metabolism in multiple brain regions in mild AD patients and healthy age-matched control subjects by 3D 31P MRS imaging.

Methods

31P MRSI was performed in 31 drug-naïve mild AD patients (MMSE ≥20; 73.5±6.9 [mean±SD] yrs) and 31 age- and gender-matched controls (73.5±6.3 yrs). Whole brain 31P-MRSI data was obtained on a Siemens Magnetom Trio 3T system with a dual-tuned 1H/31P volume head coil (Rapid) and a 3D pulse-acquire sequence with the following parameter values: TR=2000 ms, TE=0.10 ms, 40° flip-angle, NA=4, WALTZ4 proton decoupling, nominal voxel size=16.25x16.25x16.25mm, TA=13:08 min. Resonances in MR spectra from four regions of interest (ROI; left and right hippocampus, HL and HR; anterior cingulate cortex, ACC; and RSC) were fitted using Metabolite Report (Siemens) (Figure 1), resulting in metabolite levels of phosphocholine (PCho),phosphoethanolamine (PEtn), glycerophosphocholine (GPCho), glycerophosphoethanolamine (GPEtn), inorganic phosphate (Pi), phosphocreatine (PCr), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD(H)) and alpha, beta and gamma adenosine triphosphate (a/b/yATP). For all metabolites the signal percentage with respect to the total phosphorus signal was calculated. Both a quantitative evaluation of the fitting results (Cramer–Rao lower bound ≤30%) and a visual quality control (independently by two spectroscopists) were performed. Only metabolites that passed both quality checks were included in the statistical analyses. Level of phosphomonoesters (PME) was calculated as the sum of PCh and PEth, phosphodiesters (PDE) as the sum of GPCh and GPEth, and total ATP (tATP) as the sum of aATP, bATP and yATP. In addition, we calculated pH and ratios for phosphomonoesters to phosphodiesters (PME/PDE as well as PEth/GPEth and PCh/GPCh), and PCr to Pi. Group differences were analyzed using a mixed model with group (AD or control), sex, and brain region as fixed factors, considering brain region as a within subject factor, and adjusting for age.

Results

Quality control led to the rejection of 3-20% of metabolite fits for phospholipid metabolites and NAD(H). Excellent fits (<2% rejected) for all other metabolites was achieved. An interaction between group and brain region was found for PCr, showing that levels of PCr were higher in mild AD patients compared with healthy control (HC) subjects in the RSC (LS mean difference=0.86, SEM=0.29 [p=0.004]) and left (LS mean difference=1.52, SEM=0.52 [p=0.005]) and right hippocampus (LS mean difference=1.47, SEM=0.38 [p<0.001]), but not in the ACC (Figure 2A). A main effect of group was found for PCr/Pi (AD>HC; LS mean difference=0.22, SEM=0.11 [p=0.046]; Figure 2B) and pH (AD>HC; LS mean difference=0.008, SEM=0.004 [p=0.032]; Figure 2C). No effect of group was found for Pi, NAD(H), t/a/b/yATP or any of the phospholipid compounds measured. A main effect of brain region was found for PEth, PDE, GPEtn, GPCh, PME/PDE, PEth/GPEth, PCh/GPCh, PCr/Pi, Pi, t/a/b/yATP, NAD(H), and pH.

Discussion and conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest 31P MRS study performed in AD patients. By using 3D MRSI we were able to measure multiple brain regions simultaneously and provide both disease specific as well as regional information. Most phospholipid compounds and all high energy phosphates displayed regional variation. This may be caused by true intra-cellular metabolic differences between brain regions, or arise from differences in tissue composition. The differences in PCr and pH found between AD patients and healthy aged controls indicate a redistribution of metabolites involved in the CK reaction equilibrium [K = PCr∙ADP∙H+ / Cr∙ATP]. Taken together with changes in PCr/Pi, this could reflect altered energy metabolism in AD, or alternatively, be a consequence of morphological differences (altered ratio of neurons to glia cells, e.g. gliosis).

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1Nestor, et al. 2003, Eur J Neurosci 18(9); 2Greicius, et al. 2004, PNAS 101(13); 3Nitsch, et al. 1992, PNAS 89(5); 4Aksenov, et al. 2000, J Neurochem 74(6); 5Pettegrew, et al. 1994, Neurobiol Aging 15(1); 6Forlenza, et al. 2005, Psychopharmacology 180(2); 7Mandal, et al. 2012, J Alz Dis 29;

Figures

Figure 1 Regions of interest and example spectrum from a patient with Alzheimer's disease. Top left, anterior cingulate (blue) and retrosplenial (yellow) cortex; top right, left and right hippocampus (purple). Bottom, representative spectrum from the retrosplenial cortex showing original spectrum (white), fitted spectrum (red), baseline (blue) and residual (green).

Figure 2 Phosphocreatine levels (PCr; A), ratio of PCr to inorganic phosphate (PCr/Pi; B) and pH (C) in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and healthy control (HC) subjects. Data represent LS means±SEM, *p<0.05 AD vs HC. ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; RSC, retrosplenial cortex; HL, left hippocampus; HR, right hippocampus.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0150