Qian Tao1, Esra Gucuk Ipek2, Rahil Shahzad1, Floris F. Berendsen1, Saman Nazarian2, and Rob J. van der Geest1
1Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Department of Cardiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
The extent and distribution of left
atrial (LA) scar, visualized by LGE MR, can provide important information for
treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. However, in current practice,
to extract such information requires substantial manual effort and expertise.
In this study, a fully automatic method was developed to segment LA and PV’s in
LGE-MRI, combining robust multi-atlas segmentation and flexible level-set based
segmentation optimization. The method demonstrated comparable accuracy to
manual segmentation, with improved 3D continuity. The method enables automated
generation of patient-specific LA and PV geometry models, and potentially objective
LA scar assessment for individual AF patients.PURPOSE
Information of left atrial (LA) scar
provides important information for treatment and management of atrial
fibrillation (AF) patients.
1 In clinical practice, however, to
extract the LA scar information from late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) MRI is highly
challenging due to the complex LA and pulmonary vein (PV) geometry and the
limited image contrast. Manual tracing in a slice-by-slice manner is not only
time-consuming but also observer-dependent, practically limiting the utilization
of LGE-MRI for AF treatment. The purpose of this study is to develop a fully
automatic method to segment the LA and PV’s from LGE-MRI, which can facilitate
objective LA scar assessment.
METHODS
During the MR examination of AF patients,
a contrast enhanced MR angiography (MRA) sequence is normally acquired prior to
LGE-MRI for assessment of the patient anatomy. We propose to take advantage of the
high blood contrast in MRA to improve the accuracy and robustness of LA and PV
segmentation in LGE.
The proposed segmentation method
contains three steps: (1) Global segmentation of the MRA: Firstly, each of 10 MRA
atlases, with previously obtained LA and PV segmentation, was registered to the
given MRA image;2 secondly, the known segmentations were propagated
to the given image so that each voxel has 10 votes; finally, the majority-vote
was made to provide the labeling of the LA and PV regions in the given image. (2)
Inter-scan MRA-LGE registration and fusion: Mutual-information based registration
was applied to align the MRA to the LGE sequence of the same subject,
correcting for patient movement and respiratory motion. The registered MRA was
multiplied with LGE to generate a fused volume with enhanced blood signal
intensity. The MRA segmentation from the first step was also propagated to the
fused volume. (3) Local refinement: With the propagated MRA segmentation as
initialization, a 3D level-set approach was applied to the fused volume, refining
the initial segmentation to patient-specific details.
The method was validated on a data set
of 46 AF patients who underwent preprocedural MRI. During the MR examination, a
contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) sequence was acquired for anatomy
assessment followed by a LGE sequence for LA scar assessment. An experienced
observer manually annotated the LA and PV regions in all 46 LGE sequence in a
slice-by-slice manner, as the reference to evaluate the automatic segmentation
results. In addition, a second observer also manually annotated the LA and PV
regions in 10 subjects for assessment of inter-observer variability. Evaluation
of the segmentation performance was in terms of surface-to-surface distance and
the Dice overlap index, in the LA and PV regions, respectively.
RESULTS
The LA and PV’s were automatically
segmented in all 46 subjects. Compared with manual segmentation, the method
yielded a surface-to-surface distance of 1.49±0.65 mm in the LA region, and
2.13±0.67 mm in the PV regions. The difference between the automatic and manual
segmentation was comparable to the inter-observer difference, which was 1.36±0.38 mm in the LA region (P>0.05),
and 2.12±0.57 mm in the PV regions (P>0.05). The Dice indices were 0.86±0.05 in the LA region between the automatic and manual
segmentation, compared with 0.88±0.05 between two observers (P>0.05). The
Dice indices were 0.36±0.08 in the PV regions between the automatic and manual
segmentation, compared with 0.39±0.09 between two observers (P>0.05). Figure
2 shows the comparison between the automatic and manual results in 2D slice and
in 3D volume.
DISCUSSION
The fully automatic method demonstrated comparable
accuracy to the manual segmentation. The agreement was high in the LA region
while relatively low in the PV regions, which can be explained by Figure 2. It
is also shown that the automatic segmentation achieved better 3D spatial
smoothness compared to the result of slice-by-slice manual contouring.
For clinical research, accurate LA and PV segmentation indicates
that it is possible to further assess the LA scar from the LGE MRI without
manual interference. Figure 3 shows the blood-normalized local LGE intensity,3
sampled on the profile line perpendicular to the surface mesh, mapped onto the segmented
LA and PV geometry.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, a fully automatic method has
been developed to accurately segment LA and PV’s in LGE-MRI, combining a MRA
sequence acquired during the same examination. The proposed method makes it
possible to automatically generate a patient-specific LA and PV geometry model,
and enables display of hyperenhanced tissue in LA wall for individual AF
patients.
Acknowledgements
The work was financially supported by the Dutch Technology Foundation (STW project no.12899).References
1. Marrouche
NF, Wilber D, Hindricks G, Jais P, Akoum N, Marchlinski F, et al. Association
of atrial tissue fibrosis identified by delayed enhancement MRI and atrial
fibrillation catheter ablation: the DECAAF study. JAMA. 2014;311(5):498–506.
2. Rohlfing
T, Brandt R, Menzel R, Maurer Jr. CR. Evaluation of atlas selection strategies
for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy
images of bee brains. NeuroImage. 2004;21(4):1428–42.
3. Khurram
IM, Beinart R, Zipunnikov V, Dewire J, Yarmohammadi H, Sasaki T, et al.
Magnetic resonance image intensity ratio, a normalized measure to enable
interpatient comparability of left atrial fibrosis. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(1):85–92.