Can anti-VEGF Antibody Reverse Radiation Necrosis? A Preclinical Investigation
Chong Duan1, Carlos J Perez-Torres2, Liya Yuan3, John A Engelbach4, Christina T Tsien5, Keith M Rich3,5, Robert E Schmidt6, Joseph JH Ackerman1,4,7,8, and Joel R Garbow4,8

1Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States, 2Radiological Health Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States, 3Neurosurgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States, 4Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States, 5Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States, 6Neuropathology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States, 7Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States, 8Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States

Synopsis

Recently, radiation necrosis (RN) has been treated clinically using bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody. While bevacizumab reduces radiographic RN volume, the treatment has potentially serious complications and rebound phenomena after the discontinuation of the therapy. In the present study, we investigated the anti-VEGF treatment of pure radiation necrosis in a mouse model. Favorable radiographic appearance of RN were observed following the anti-VEGF treatment. However, the lesions were not completely resolved histologically (e.g., focal mineral deposits were observed in the treated mice). In addition, despite the treatment, VEGF and HIF-1α were still upregulated, which presents the potential risk of recurrence of RN.

Purpose

Radiation-induced necrosis (RN) is a late time-to-onset, devastating complication following radiotherapy to the central nervous system. Recently, RN in the brain has been treated clinically using bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody. While bevacizumab reduces radiographic volume of necrosis-associated vascular leakage and resultant edema,1 the treatment has potentially serious complications and rebound phenomena after the discontinuation of the therapy.2,3 A comprehensive study of the treatment effect, validated with gold-standard histology, is warranted. Preclinical models present a unique opportunity to study the effects of anti-VEGF antibody treatment on pure radiation necrosis, independent of the complication of other pathologies, including recurrent tumors. In the present study, we systematically investigated the anti-VEGF treatment of radiation necrosis in a mouse model via anatomic and diffusion-weighted MRI. We also evaluated the treatment responses using standard H&E and immunohistochemistry stains, an evaluation that is, generally, impractical in humans due to a lack of appropriate tissue samples.

Methods

Animal Model: All experiments were performed on female BALB/c mice. A single-fraction 50 Gy dose of radiation (50% isodose) from the Leksell Gamma Knife PerfexionTM (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) was focused on the cortex of the left hemisphere. At this dose, moderate focal RN can be observed at approximately week 8 post-irradiation (PIR).4 B20-4.1.1, a murine antibody that recognizes VEGF and GP120:9239, a murine antibody of the same isotype that targets the HIV capsid protein, were obtained from Genentech (San Francisco, CA). At week 8 PIR, mice were randomly divided into two groups: (i) an anti-VEGF group treated with B20-4.1.1 and (ii) an isotype-control group treated with GP120:9239. Each antibody was administrated at 10 mg/kg twice weekly ip until week 12 PIR. To minimize the acute effect of blocking VEGF activity on permeability and therefore contrast-agent extravasation, all MRI scans were performed two days following a treatment. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Images were acquired with a 4.7-T small-animal Agilent/Variant DirectDriveTM scanner using actively decoupled transmit (volume) and receive (surface) coils. Diffusion-weighted images (DWI), post-contrast T1-weighted images (T1W) and T2-weighted images (T2W) were acquired. Data analysis: RN volumes were derived on both T1W and T2W images as previously described,5 using custom-written Matlab software (The Mathworks, Natick, MA). For DWI, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were calculated as the average of three diffusion datasets, acquired with diffusion encoding along three orthogonal directions, with a b-value of 1000 s/mm2. For both groups, ROIs were defined on the T1W images at week 8 PIR and overlaid onto the ADC maps. Each week-12 PIR images was co-registered to its corresponding week-8 PIR image. The same ROI drawn on week-8 image was then overlaid onto the corresponding week-12 image. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired-sample t-test.

Results and Discussion

As shown in Figure 1, anatomic MR-derived lesion volumes decreased after the anti-VEGF treatment from (T1W/T2W) 51.3 ± 19.0/45.9 ± 15.5 mm3 to 24.6 ± 14.8/21.7 ± 13.5 mm3 (P<0.001), while the lesion volumes of the isotype-control treated group increased from 55.4 ± 27.0/40.5 ± 15.8 mm3 to 101.9 ± 42.9/84.9 ± 28.4 mm3 (P<0.001). Similarly, Figure 2 shows that the abnormally high median ADCs across the lesions also decreased from 0.95 ± 0.07 to 0.73 ± 0.04 μm2/ms (P<0.001) for the anti-VEGF treated mice. Histologically, the anti-VEGF treated mice demonstrate less radiation necrosis-related pathologies, e.g., fibrinoid vascular necrosis, hemorrhage, tissue loss (Figure 3). Interestingly, mineralization (dystrophic calcification) was observed in roughly half of the anti-VEGF treated subjects, while none of the isotype-control treated brains showed any mineral deposits. As shown in Figure 4, despite the anti-VEGF treatment, VEGF and HIF-1α, a well-known transactivator of VEGF, were still upregulated, which presents the potential risk of recurrence of RN after the discontinuation of therapy.

Conclusions

Despite the initial improved radiographic appearance of RN lesions following anti-VEGF treatment, the lesions are not completely resolved histologically. The subsequent calcification and continued upregulation of VEGF and HIF-1α merit further clinical (and preclinical) follow up and investigation.

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by NIH grant R01 CA155365 (J.R.G), and funding fro the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center (P30 CA091842). We thank Genentech (San Francisco, CA) for donation of the antibodies.

References

1. Gonzalez J, Kumar AJ, Conrad CA, Levin VA. Effect of bevacizumab on radiation necrosis of the brain. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2007;67:323–326; 2. Lubelski D, Abdullah KG, Weil RJ, Marko NF. Bevacizumab for radiation necrosis following treatment of high grade glioma: a systematic review of the literature. J. Neurooncol. 2013;115:317–322; 3. Jeyaretna DS, Curry WT, Batchelor TT, et al. Exacerbation of Cerebral Radiation Necrosis by Bevacizumab. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011;29:e159–e162; 4. Jiang X, Yuan L, Engelbach JA, et al. A Gamma-Knife-Enabled Mouse Model of Cerebral Single-Hemisphere Delayed Radiation Necrosis. PloS One 2015;10:e0139596; 5. Jiang X, Engelbach JA, Yuan L, et al. Anti-VEGF antibodies mitigate the development of radiation necrosis in mouse brain. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2014;20:2695–2702.

Figures

Figure 1. Anti-VEGF treatment responses shown on anatomic MRI. At the top are representative images at week 8 PIR (pre-treatment) and week 12 PIR (post-treatment) for the isotype-control and anti-VEGF treated mice. Below the images are MR-derived lesion volumes (mean ± SD, n = 12) vs. time after irradiation.

Figure 2. Anti-VEGF treatment responses shown on diffusion-weighted MRI. On the left are representative ADC maps. Boxplots (n = 9) show median ADCs across the lesions. The contralateral group represents normal brain ADCs. “***” and “ns” indicate P<0.001 and no significance, respectively.

Figure 3. Representative 2x (top) and 20x (bottom) H&E histology slides for one isotype-control treated (left) and two anti-VEGF treated (middle and right) mice at week 12 PIR. Note the large area of focal mineral deposits in the bottom right panel.

Figure 4. Representative 60x VEGF (top) and HIF-1α (bottom) staining for non-irradiated (left), isotype-control treated (middle) and anti-VEGF treated (right) mice. Brown indicates positive staining for both VEGF and HIF-1α.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0136