David Aramburu Nuñez1,2, Kathryn Beal3, Vaios Hatzoglou4, Andrei Holodny4, Ramesh Paudyal1, Yonggang Lu5, Joseph O Deasy1, and Amita Shukla-Dave6
1Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States, 2Department of Radiology, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain, 3Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States, 4Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States, 5Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States, 6Medical Physics & Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
In
clinical settings it is essential to accurately assess, whether or not a brain
metastasis has been successfully treated or whether the metastasis require additional
treatment. This is the first study that evaluated brain metastases with IVIM
DW-MRI and DCE-MRI data both pre- and post- stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The
preliminary results are promising as it will inform the treating physicians at
an early time point about which patients will benefit from SRS (or not). The
survival status and functional metrics show different trends for both AWD and
DOD that need to be validated in larger patient population.Purpose
Intravoxel
incoherent motion (IVIM) DW-MRI has demonstrated promise in simultaneously
characterizing the properties of tumor diffusion and perfusion in cancer patients
1, 2 . Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI provides information
of tumor vascularity and permeability
3, 4.
There is growing evidence that MRI perfusion can improve the diagnosis and
prognosis of patients with brain tumors over conventional imaging alone
5, 6. In
the clinical settings it is essential to accurately assess, whether or not a
brain metastasis has been successfully treated or whether the metastasis
requires additional treatment. There are a currently a number of challenging
issues that arise when attempting to accurately assess the treatment response
of a brain metastasis treated by focal, high dose radiation therapy, such as
stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Hence, it is essential to develop noninvasive quantitative
imaging methods that will be able to determine if a metastasis has been
successfully treated early in the patient’s treatment course. The purpose of
this study was to determine whether quantitative imaging metrics derived from
IVIM DW- and DCE- MRI can assess early treatment response in patients with
brain metastases treated with SRS.
Methods
Our
institutional review board approved this prospective imaging study of patients
with brain metastases treated with SRS. All patients signed informed consent. Brain
metastases from any pathology were accepted. Patients had 1 pre- treatment (TX)
and 1 post TX MRI [1-72 hours] for early response assessment. All MRIs were
performed on a 3-T scanner (Ingenia; Philips Healthcare). IVIM DW-MRI acquisitions were performed using
SS-EPI sequence (TR = 4000 ms, TE = 98-104 ms, NEX = 2, FOV (cm): 24, slice thickness
(mm)= 5 with10 b values of b = 0, 20, 50, 80, 200, 300, 500, 800, 1500, 2000 s/mm2.
DCE-MRI data acquisition: 3D-SPGR pulse sequence with 4 flip angles (FA=20,
80, 160, 300) was used for native T1 mapping,
followed by dynamic imaging with contrast agent administration (FA=30o,
TR = 4.6 ms, TE = 2.4 ms, phases = 40-60, NEX = 1, FOV (cm): 24, slice
thickness (mm) =5). The contrast agent
Gd-DTPA was delivered by antecubital vein catheters at a bolus of 0.1 mmol/kg
and 2 cc/s, followed by saline flush. The regions of interest (ROIs) on the
brain metastases were defined by an experienced neuro-radiologist, the apparent
diffusion coefficients (ADC) as well as f (vascular fraction), D (pure
diffusion coefficient), D* (pseudo-diffusion coefficient) were calculated by
using monoexponential and biexponential functions with a scheme of noise
correction respectively
7. A simplified two compartment standard model
(SM) was used to analyze the data. The metrics derived from SM were K
trans
(volume transfer constant), v
e (volume fraction of
extravascular extracellular space),vp (volume fraction of vascular
space). Clinical overall response was assessed as standard of care. Non-parametric
Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to investigate the
correlation between the metrics and clinical response which was grouped as no
evidence of disease (NED), alive with disease (AWD), dead of disease (DOD) and
dead due to unknown reason (DUK).
Results
For
the 5 patients, the brain metastases were analyzed using the 5 pre-Tx and 5
post-Tx MRIs. The post-Tx MRI was acquired within 72 hours of SRS to capture
early treatment response. There was a significant association between the mean
of the pre-treatment K
trans and ve (p=0.016) and the mean
of the post-treatment Ktrans and v
e (p=0.032). On
clinical follow up the survival status of patients was as follows: 2 AWD, 2 DOD
and 1 DUK. Only D, Ktrans and ve metric maps for pre-, and
post-treatment MRIs from a representative brain metastasis patient with AWD is
shown in Figure 1 (Table 1). Similar
metric maps are displayed for a brain metastasis patient who was DOD in Figure
2 (Table 1). Both the figures show promising and encouraging trends for AWD and
DOD with metric values changing between pre- and post-treatment MRI which was
soon after (within 72 hrs) SRS.
Discussion
We have demonstrated for the
first time that perfusion and diffusion metric values can change substantially
even within 72 hours post SRS. This is a key finding that may help treating
physicians assess response very early on in the course of treatment and help in
individualized patient management.
Conclusion
Our study demonstrates
promising early response results for patients with brain metastases undergoing
SRS. These findings need to be validated in a larger patient population.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Lemke, A., et al., Differentiation of pancreas carcinoma from
healthy pancreatic tissue using multiple b-values: comparison of apparent
diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion derived parameters.
Invest Radiol, 2009. 44(12): p. 769-75.
2. Sigmund, E.E., et al., Intravoxel incoherent motion and
diffusion-tensor imaging in renal tissue under hydration and furosemide flow
challenges. Radiology, 2012. 263(3): p. 758-69.
3. Law, M., et al., Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and
predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging
compared with conventional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2003. 24(10): p.
1989-98.
4. Law, M., et al., Histogram analysis versus region of interest
analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging data in the
grading of cerebral gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2007. 28(4): p. 761-6.
5. Barajas, R.F., Jr., et al., Differentiation of recurrent
glioblastoma multiforme from radiation necrosis after external beam radiation
therapy with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR
imaging. Radiology, 2009. 253(2): p. 486-96.
6. Matsusue, E., et al., Distinction between glioma progression
and post-radiation change by combined physiologic MR imaging. Neuroradiology,
2010. 52(4): p. 297-306.
7. Lu, Y., et al., Extension of the intravoxel incoherent motion
model to non-gaussian diffusion in head and neck cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging,
2012. 36(5): p. 1088-96.